A Longitudinal Prediction of Suicide Attempts in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Machine Learning Study.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lidia Fortaner-Uyà, Camilla Monopoli, Marco Cavicchioli, Federico Calesella, Federica Colombo, Ilaria Carretta, Chiara Talè, Francesco Benedetti, Raffaele Visintini, Cesare Maffei, Benedetta Vai
{"title":"A Longitudinal Prediction of Suicide Attempts in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Machine Learning Study.","authors":"Lidia Fortaner-Uyà, Camilla Monopoli, Marco Cavicchioli, Federico Calesella, Federica Colombo, Ilaria Carretta, Chiara Talè, Francesco Benedetti, Raffaele Visintini, Cesare Maffei, Benedetta Vai","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with a high risk of suicide. Despite several risk factors being known, identifying vulnerable patients in clinical practice remains a challenge so far. The current study aimed at predicting suicide attempts among BPD patients during disorder-specific psychotherapeutic interventions exploiting machine learning techniques. The study took into account several potential predictors relevant to BPD psychopathology: emotion dysregulation, temperamental and character factors, attachment style, impulsivity, and aggression. The sample included 69 patients with BPD who completed the Temperament and Character Inventory, Attachment Style Questionnaire, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, and Aggression Questionnaire at baseline and after 6 months of psychotherapy. To detect future suicide attempts, baseline questionnaires were entered as predictors into an elastic net penalized regression, whose predictive performance was assessed through nested fivefold cross-validation. At the same time, 5000 iterations of a non-parametric bootstrap were used to determine predictors' robustness. The elastic net model discriminating BPD suicide attempters from non-attempters reached a balanced accuracy of 64.09% and an area under the receiver operating curve of 70.44%. High preoccupation with relationships, harm avoidance, and reward dependence, along with low motor impulsiveness, verbal aggression, cooperativeness, and self-transcendence were the most contributing predictors. Our findings suggest that interpersonal vulnerability and internalizing factors are the strongest predictors of future suicide attempts in BPD. Machine learning on self-report psychological scales may be helpful to identify individuals at suicidal risk, potentially helping clinical settings to develop individualized preventive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with a high risk of suicide. Despite several risk factors being known, identifying vulnerable patients in clinical practice remains a challenge so far. The current study aimed at predicting suicide attempts among BPD patients during disorder-specific psychotherapeutic interventions exploiting machine learning techniques. The study took into account several potential predictors relevant to BPD psychopathology: emotion dysregulation, temperamental and character factors, attachment style, impulsivity, and aggression. The sample included 69 patients with BPD who completed the Temperament and Character Inventory, Attachment Style Questionnaire, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, and Aggression Questionnaire at baseline and after 6 months of psychotherapy. To detect future suicide attempts, baseline questionnaires were entered as predictors into an elastic net penalized regression, whose predictive performance was assessed through nested fivefold cross-validation. At the same time, 5000 iterations of a non-parametric bootstrap were used to determine predictors' robustness. The elastic net model discriminating BPD suicide attempters from non-attempters reached a balanced accuracy of 64.09% and an area under the receiver operating curve of 70.44%. High preoccupation with relationships, harm avoidance, and reward dependence, along with low motor impulsiveness, verbal aggression, cooperativeness, and self-transcendence were the most contributing predictors. Our findings suggest that interpersonal vulnerability and internalizing factors are the strongest predictors of future suicide attempts in BPD. Machine learning on self-report psychological scales may be helpful to identify individuals at suicidal risk, potentially helping clinical settings to develop individualized preventive strategies.

边缘型人格障碍患者自杀企图的纵向预测:一项机器学习研究。
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)与高自杀风险有关。尽管已知几个危险因素,但到目前为止,在临床实践中识别易感患者仍然是一个挑战。目前的研究旨在利用机器学习技术预测BPD患者在特定障碍心理治疗干预期间的自杀企图。该研究考虑了与BPD精神病理相关的几个潜在预测因素:情绪失调、气质和性格因素、依恋类型、冲动和攻击性。样本包括69例BPD患者,他们分别在治疗前和治疗6个月完成了气质与性格量表、依恋类型问卷、情绪调节困难量表、Barratt冲动量表和攻击量表。为了检测未来的自杀企图,将基线问卷作为预测因子输入弹性网惩罚回归,其预测性能通过嵌套五倍交叉验证进行评估。同时,使用非参数bootstrap的5000次迭代来确定预测器的鲁棒性。弹性网络模型区分BPD自杀企图者和非自杀企图者的平衡准确率为64.09%,接受者工作曲线下面积为70.44%。对人际关系的高度关注、伤害避免和奖励依赖,以及低运动冲动、言语攻击、合作和自我超越是最重要的预测因素。我们的研究结果表明,人际脆弱性和内化因素是BPD患者未来自杀企图的最强预测因子。自我报告心理量表上的机器学习可能有助于识别有自杀风险的个体,可能有助于临床机构制定个性化的预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信