Yan Zhai, You-Yi Hui, Ze-Fei Jiang, Lin Ding, Jie Cheng, Tang Xing, Han Zhai, Hong Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of wet cupping in the treatment of neurodermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yan Zhai, You-Yi Hui, Ze-Fei Jiang, Lin Ding, Jie Cheng, Tang Xing, Han Zhai, Hong Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1478073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurodermatitis is a chronic skin condition characterized by intense itching and skin thickening due to neurological dysfunction. Its persistent nature poses a challenge to effective treatment, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Wet cupping therapy is increasingly being used in clinics to manage neurodermatitis, so it is imperative to assess the evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of wet cupping therapy in patients with neurodermatitis.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating wet cupping for neurodermatitis were identified through searches of eight electronic databases and three clinical trial registration platforms from inception to March 2024, using predefined search terms. Included studies underwent quality appraisal using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Assessment tool. The quality of evidence was assessed independently by two reviewers using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System (GRADE). Meta-analysis and publication bias assessment were conducted using ReviewManager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review encompassed 19 studies, comprising 6 types of comparisons and involving 1,505 participants. The findings revealed no significant difference in the total effective rate between wet cupping alone and high-potency steroids (<i>n</i> = 269, RR = 1.13, 95% CI [0.90, 1.41], <i>p</i> = 0.29, I<sup>2</sup> = 83%). However, wet cupping combined with medication or moxibustion exhibited superior efficacy compared to medication alone (<i>n</i> = 272, RR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.16, 1.41], <i>p</i> < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 43%) and (<i>n</i> = 534, RR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.14, 1.30], <i>p</i> < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Wet cupping groups demonstrated lower recurrence rates (<i>n</i> = 266, RR = 0.31, 95% CI [0.16, 0.60], <i>p</i> = 0.0005, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and a reduced incidence of adverse events (<i>n</i> = 673, RR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.21, 0.90], <i>p</i> = 0.02, I<sup>2</sup> = 36%). Furthermore, wet cupping alone or combined with moxibustion effectively lowered the levels of inflammatory factors compared to medication: TNF-<i>α</i> (<i>n</i> = 120, MD = -6.99, 95% CI [-8.13, -5.85], <i>p</i> < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), IL-1β (<i>n</i> = 120, MD = -5.28, 95% CI [-6.91, -3.65], <i>p</i> < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 48%), and IL-6 (<i>n</i> = 180, MD = -8.61, 95% CI [-13.24, -3.99], <i>p</i> = 0.0003, I<sup>2</sup> = 81%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of wet cupping therapy is comparable to that of high-potency steroids. Its combined use with medication or moxibustion appears to enhance effectiveness, reduce recurrence rates, and improve safety. However, due to the overall low grade of evidence for the identified outcomes and poor methodological quality, caution is advised when interpreting and applying these findings in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD42024524398.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1478073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1478073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Neurodermatitis is a chronic skin condition characterized by intense itching and skin thickening due to neurological dysfunction. Its persistent nature poses a challenge to effective treatment, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Wet cupping therapy is increasingly being used in clinics to manage neurodermatitis, so it is imperative to assess the evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety.
Objective: This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of wet cupping therapy in patients with neurodermatitis.
Methods and analysis: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating wet cupping for neurodermatitis were identified through searches of eight electronic databases and three clinical trial registration platforms from inception to March 2024, using predefined search terms. Included studies underwent quality appraisal using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Assessment tool. The quality of evidence was assessed independently by two reviewers using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System (GRADE). Meta-analysis and publication bias assessment were conducted using ReviewManager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software, respectively.
Results: This review encompassed 19 studies, comprising 6 types of comparisons and involving 1,505 participants. The findings revealed no significant difference in the total effective rate between wet cupping alone and high-potency steroids (n = 269, RR = 1.13, 95% CI [0.90, 1.41], p = 0.29, I2 = 83%). However, wet cupping combined with medication or moxibustion exhibited superior efficacy compared to medication alone (n = 272, RR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.16, 1.41], p < 0.00001, I2 = 43%) and (n = 534, RR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.14, 1.30], p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Wet cupping groups demonstrated lower recurrence rates (n = 266, RR = 0.31, 95% CI [0.16, 0.60], p = 0.0005, I2 = 0%) and a reduced incidence of adverse events (n = 673, RR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.21, 0.90], p = 0.02, I2 = 36%). Furthermore, wet cupping alone or combined with moxibustion effectively lowered the levels of inflammatory factors compared to medication: TNF-α (n = 120, MD = -6.99, 95% CI [-8.13, -5.85], p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%), IL-1β (n = 120, MD = -5.28, 95% CI [-6.91, -3.65], p < 0.00001, I2 = 48%), and IL-6 (n = 180, MD = -8.61, 95% CI [-13.24, -3.99], p = 0.0003, I2 = 81%).
Conclusion: The efficacy of wet cupping therapy is comparable to that of high-potency steroids. Its combined use with medication or moxibustion appears to enhance effectiveness, reduce recurrence rates, and improve safety. However, due to the overall low grade of evidence for the identified outcomes and poor methodological quality, caution is advised when interpreting and applying these findings in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world