Complications and outcomes of post-transplant lymphocele management: a 30-year retrospective analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-04348-3
Oleksandr Boiko, Ignacio Garcia-Alonso, Jesus Padilla, David Lecumberri, Mykola Boiko
{"title":"Complications and outcomes of post-transplant lymphocele management: a 30-year retrospective analysis.","authors":"Oleksandr Boiko, Ignacio Garcia-Alonso, Jesus Padilla, David Lecumberri, Mykola Boiko","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04348-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current guidelines recommend percutaneous drainage as the first-line approach for the management of symptomatic lymphoceles following renal transplantation, with surgical fenestration reserved for refractory or recurrent cases. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of these therapeutic strategies in renal transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 109 renal transplant recipients with symptomatic lymphoceles treated between 1993 and 2023 at a single public center was conducted. Recipients were followed from lymphocele diagnosis through treatment to resolution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Percutaneous drainage was performed as the initial treatment in 101 recipients, while 8 underwent primary fenestration. Among patients treated with drainage, 43.5% developed infections, with infection risk increasing with catheter placement duration: odds ratio (OR) 2.57 (p = 0.28) at 2 weeks, 15.0 (p = 0.003) at 4 weeks, and 20.2 (p = 0.002) at 6 weeks. Resolution with drainage alone occurred in 54.8% of cases after a median of 39 days. The remaining patients required fenestration as a second-line treatment. No significant difference was observed in the total duration of hospital stay between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonged percutaneous drainage for post-transplant lymphoceles is associated with high infection rates and limited efficacy, warranting its use primarily for renal function stabilization or diagnostic purposes. Further studies are necessary to investigate alternative management strategies that may improve outcomes and reduce complications in recipients with symptomatic lymphoceles following renal transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1747-1753"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04348-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend percutaneous drainage as the first-line approach for the management of symptomatic lymphoceles following renal transplantation, with surgical fenestration reserved for refractory or recurrent cases. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of these therapeutic strategies in renal transplant recipients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 109 renal transplant recipients with symptomatic lymphoceles treated between 1993 and 2023 at a single public center was conducted. Recipients were followed from lymphocele diagnosis through treatment to resolution.

Results: Percutaneous drainage was performed as the initial treatment in 101 recipients, while 8 underwent primary fenestration. Among patients treated with drainage, 43.5% developed infections, with infection risk increasing with catheter placement duration: odds ratio (OR) 2.57 (p = 0.28) at 2 weeks, 15.0 (p = 0.003) at 4 weeks, and 20.2 (p = 0.002) at 6 weeks. Resolution with drainage alone occurred in 54.8% of cases after a median of 39 days. The remaining patients required fenestration as a second-line treatment. No significant difference was observed in the total duration of hospital stay between the two methods.

Conclusion: Prolonged percutaneous drainage for post-transplant lymphoceles is associated with high infection rates and limited efficacy, warranting its use primarily for renal function stabilization or diagnostic purposes. Further studies are necessary to investigate alternative management strategies that may improve outcomes and reduce complications in recipients with symptomatic lymphoceles following renal transplantation.

移植后淋巴囊肿处理的并发症和结果:30年回顾性分析。
目前的指南推荐经皮引流作为治疗肾移植后症状性淋巴囊肿的一线方法,对于难治性或复发性病例保留手术开窗。本研究评估了这些治疗策略在肾移植受者中的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析1993年至2023年在同一公共中心接受肾移植治疗的109例有症状的淋巴细胞瘤患者。从淋巴囊肿的诊断到治疗直至消退,对受者进行随访。结果:101例接受经皮引流作为初始治疗,8例接受首次开窗治疗。在接受引流治疗的患者中,43.5%发生感染,感染风险随着置管时间的延长而增加:优势比(OR): 2周时为2.57 (p = 0.28), 4周时为15.0 (p = 0.003), 6周时为20.2 (p = 0.002)。54.8%的病例在平均39天后通过引流得到缓解。其余患者需要开窗作为二线治疗。两种方法的总住院时间无显著差异。结论:移植后淋巴细胞的长期经皮引流与高感染率和有限的疗效相关,保证其主要用于肾功能稳定或诊断目的。有必要进一步研究其他治疗策略,以改善肾移植后症状性淋巴细胞受者的预后并减少并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信