Sue Cao, Jie Zhang, Chenyu Dong, Yutao Que, Xin Gao, Ruomi Guo
{"title":"Reproducibility of liver iron concentration measured by R2* method based on 1.5-T MRI: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Sue Cao, Jie Zhang, Chenyu Dong, Yutao Que, Xin Gao, Ruomi Guo","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11334-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the reproducibility of the 1.5-T MR imaging (MRI)-based R2* method in measuring the liver iron concentration (LIC) across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases and identified studies that used the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method to measure the LIC. The original data were extracted from the selected studies. Reproducibility was assessed in terms of the ability to replicate the measured LIC with the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method across different scanning instruments, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. We used the scanner equipment, scan parameters, and postprocessing technique as random effects to determine whether the R2* values obtained in the different studies were significantly different after the effects of the measured LIC were excluded. The calibration curve that best fit the R2* value to the LIC was estimated via univariate regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies (1147 participants) were included. The seven studies (435 participants) in which the initial TE was ≤ 1.0 ms and the TE spacing was ≤ 1.4 ms did not have significant differences in the measured R2* value in pairwise comparisons (p > 0.05). Calibration of R2* to LIC was as follows: LIC (mg/g) = 0.042 + 2.85 × 10<sup>-2</sup> R2* (s<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>) (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method in estimating LIC was reproducible across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question The R2* method is widely used to quantify LIC, but the reproducibility of R2*-based LIC estimation remains unknown. Findings In scan sequences with an initial echo time (TE) ≤ 1.0 ms and a TE spacing ≤ 1.4 ms, the R2*-based LIC quantification at 1.5 T achieved good reproducibility. Clinical relevance The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method enables reproducible quantification of the LIC; its reproducibility spares patients from unnecessary trauma and economic burdens while promoting the extensive clinical dissemination of R2*-based LIC quantification methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"3768-3780"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11334-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the reproducibility of the 1.5-T MR imaging (MRI)-based R2* method in measuring the liver iron concentration (LIC) across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques.
Materials and methods: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases and identified studies that used the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method to measure the LIC. The original data were extracted from the selected studies. Reproducibility was assessed in terms of the ability to replicate the measured LIC with the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method across different scanning instruments, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. We used the scanner equipment, scan parameters, and postprocessing technique as random effects to determine whether the R2* values obtained in the different studies were significantly different after the effects of the measured LIC were excluded. The calibration curve that best fit the R2* value to the LIC was estimated via univariate regression.
Results: Twenty-one studies (1147 participants) were included. The seven studies (435 participants) in which the initial TE was ≤ 1.0 ms and the TE spacing was ≤ 1.4 ms did not have significant differences in the measured R2* value in pairwise comparisons (p > 0.05). Calibration of R2* to LIC was as follows: LIC (mg/g) = 0.042 + 2.85 × 10-2 R2* (s-1) (R2 = 0.79).
Conclusion: The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method in estimating LIC was reproducible across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques.
Key points: Question The R2* method is widely used to quantify LIC, but the reproducibility of R2*-based LIC estimation remains unknown. Findings In scan sequences with an initial echo time (TE) ≤ 1.0 ms and a TE spacing ≤ 1.4 ms, the R2*-based LIC quantification at 1.5 T achieved good reproducibility. Clinical relevance The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method enables reproducible quantification of the LIC; its reproducibility spares patients from unnecessary trauma and economic burdens while promoting the extensive clinical dissemination of R2*-based LIC quantification methods.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.