{"title":"Misrepresentation: A final response to Bruce and Beuthin on Medical Assistance in Dying.","authors":"Christopher Lyon","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2024.2375831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A final comment in this four-part exchange with A Bruce and R Beuthin addresses several inaccuracies and problematic omissions in their 'Response to Lyon: Oranges, apples and polarizing polemic.' I point out that court rulings mean that it is likely some form of assisted suicide or euthanasia (Medical Assistance in Dying or MAID) remains lawful in Canada, and I argue from this view. I further suggest that scholars writing about MAID clinicians' lived experiences must be transparent about their involvement in the practice to conform to methodological and ethical standards. Finally, I stress that the intense emotional rewards obtained by providers from ending lives may be horrifying to observers and those potentially eligible for MAID, and must be open to critical scrutiny.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2024.2375831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A final comment in this four-part exchange with A Bruce and R Beuthin addresses several inaccuracies and problematic omissions in their 'Response to Lyon: Oranges, apples and polarizing polemic.' I point out that court rulings mean that it is likely some form of assisted suicide or euthanasia (Medical Assistance in Dying or MAID) remains lawful in Canada, and I argue from this view. I further suggest that scholars writing about MAID clinicians' lived experiences must be transparent about their involvement in the practice to conform to methodological and ethical standards. Finally, I stress that the intense emotional rewards obtained by providers from ending lives may be horrifying to observers and those potentially eligible for MAID, and must be open to critical scrutiny.
在与 A Bruce 和 R Beuthin 的四部分交流中,最后的评论涉及他们的 "对里昂的回应 "中的一些不准确和有问题的遗漏:橘子、苹果和两极分化的论战"。我指出,法院的裁决意味着某种形式的协助自杀或安乐死(临终医疗协助或 MAID)在加拿大很可能仍然合法,我从这一观点出发进行论证。我进一步建议,撰写有关临终医疗协助临床医生生活经历的学者必须对他们参与该实践的情况保持透明,以符合方法论和道德标准。最后,我强调,医疗服务提供者从终结生命中获得的强烈情感回报可能会让旁观者和那些可能有资格获得 MAID 的人感到恐惧,因此必须接受批判性审查。
期刊介绍:
Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.