Malignancy risk stratification for pulmonary nodules: comparing a deep learning approach to multiparametric statistical models in different disease groups.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11256-8
Lars Piskorski, Manuel Debic, Oyunbileg von Stackelberg, Kai Schlamp, Linn Welzel, Oliver Weinheimer, Alan Arthur Peters, Mark Oliver Wielpütz, Thomas Frauenfelder, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Claus Peter Heußel, Jonas Kroschke
{"title":"Malignancy risk stratification for pulmonary nodules: comparing a deep learning approach to multiparametric statistical models in different disease groups.","authors":"Lars Piskorski, Manuel Debic, Oyunbileg von Stackelberg, Kai Schlamp, Linn Welzel, Oliver Weinheimer, Alan Arthur Peters, Mark Oliver Wielpütz, Thomas Frauenfelder, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Claus Peter Heußel, Jonas Kroschke","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11256-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Incidentally detected pulmonary nodules present a challenge in clinical routine with demand for reliable support systems for risk classification. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the lung-cancer-prediction-convolutional-neural-network (LCP-CNN), a deep learning-based approach, in comparison to multiparametric statistical methods (Brock model and Lung-RADS®) for risk classification of nodules in cohorts with different risk profiles and underlying pulmonary diseases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was conducted on non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans containing pulmonary nodules measuring 5-30 mm. Ground truth was defined by histology or follow-up stability. The final analysis was performed on 297 patients with 422 eligible nodules, of which 105 nodules were malignant. Classification performance of the LCP-CNN, Brock model, and Lung-RADS® was evaluated in terms of diagnostic accuracy measurements including ROC-analysis for different subcohorts (total, screening, emphysema, and interstitial lung disease).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LCP-CNN demonstrated superior performance compared to the Brock model in total and screening cohorts (AUC 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96)). Superior sensitivity of LCP-CNN was demonstrated compared to the Brock model and Lung-RADS® in total, screening, and emphysema cohorts for a risk threshold of 5%. Superior sensitivity of LCP-CNN was also shown across all disease groups compared to the Brock model at a threshold of 65%, compared to Lung-RADS® sensitivity was better or equal. No significant differences in the performance of LCP-CNN were found between subcohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study offers further evidence of the potential to integrate deep learning-based decision support systems into pulmonary nodule classification workflows, irrespective of the individual patient risk profile and underlying pulmonary disease.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Is a deep-learning approach (LCP-CNN) superior to multiparametric models (Brock model, Lung-RADS®) in classifying pulmonary nodule risk across varied patient profiles? Findings LCP-CNN shows superior performance in risk classification of pulmonary nodules compared to multiparametric models with no significant impact on risk profiles and structural pulmonary diseases. Clinical relevance LCP-CNN offers efficiency and accuracy, addressing limitations of traditional models, such as variations in manual measurements or lack of patient data, while producing robust results. Such approaches may therefore impact clinical work by complementing or even replacing current approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"3812-3822"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11256-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Incidentally detected pulmonary nodules present a challenge in clinical routine with demand for reliable support systems for risk classification. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the lung-cancer-prediction-convolutional-neural-network (LCP-CNN), a deep learning-based approach, in comparison to multiparametric statistical methods (Brock model and Lung-RADS®) for risk classification of nodules in cohorts with different risk profiles and underlying pulmonary diseases.

Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans containing pulmonary nodules measuring 5-30 mm. Ground truth was defined by histology or follow-up stability. The final analysis was performed on 297 patients with 422 eligible nodules, of which 105 nodules were malignant. Classification performance of the LCP-CNN, Brock model, and Lung-RADS® was evaluated in terms of diagnostic accuracy measurements including ROC-analysis for different subcohorts (total, screening, emphysema, and interstitial lung disease).

Results: LCP-CNN demonstrated superior performance compared to the Brock model in total and screening cohorts (AUC 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96)). Superior sensitivity of LCP-CNN was demonstrated compared to the Brock model and Lung-RADS® in total, screening, and emphysema cohorts for a risk threshold of 5%. Superior sensitivity of LCP-CNN was also shown across all disease groups compared to the Brock model at a threshold of 65%, compared to Lung-RADS® sensitivity was better or equal. No significant differences in the performance of LCP-CNN were found between subcohorts.

Conclusion: This study offers further evidence of the potential to integrate deep learning-based decision support systems into pulmonary nodule classification workflows, irrespective of the individual patient risk profile and underlying pulmonary disease.

Key points: Question Is a deep-learning approach (LCP-CNN) superior to multiparametric models (Brock model, Lung-RADS®) in classifying pulmonary nodule risk across varied patient profiles? Findings LCP-CNN shows superior performance in risk classification of pulmonary nodules compared to multiparametric models with no significant impact on risk profiles and structural pulmonary diseases. Clinical relevance LCP-CNN offers efficiency and accuracy, addressing limitations of traditional models, such as variations in manual measurements or lack of patient data, while producing robust results. Such approaches may therefore impact clinical work by complementing or even replacing current approaches.

肺结节的恶性风险分层:在不同疾病组中比较深度学习方法与多参数统计模型。
目的:偶然发现的肺结节在临床常规中提出了一个挑战,需要可靠的支持系统来进行风险分类。我们的目的是评估肺癌预测-卷积神经网络(LCP-CNN)的性能,这是一种基于深度学习的方法,与多参数统计方法(Brock模型和Lung-RADS®)相比,在具有不同风险特征和潜在肺部疾病的队列中对结节进行风险分类。材料与方法:回顾性分析5 ~ 30mm肺结节CT平扫和增强扫描结果。根据组织学或随访稳定性来定义基本事实。最终分析了297例患者422个符合条件的结节,其中105个结节为恶性。对LCP-CNN、Brock模型和lung - rads®的分类性能进行了评估,包括对不同亚群(total、screening、肺气肿和间质性肺疾病)的roc分析。结果:与Brock模型相比,LCP-CNN在总队列和筛选队列中表现出更好的性能(AUC分别为0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94)和0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96))。与Brock模型和Lung-RADS®相比,LCP-CNN在总体、筛查和肺气肿队列中具有更高的敏感性,风险阈值为5%。与Brock模型相比,LCP-CNN在所有疾病组中均具有更高的敏感性,阈值为65%,与Lung-RADS®敏感性相比更好或相同。LCP-CNN的表现在亚群之间没有显著差异。结论:该研究进一步证明了将基于深度学习的决策支持系统整合到肺结节分类工作流程中的潜力,而不考虑个体患者的风险状况和潜在的肺部疾病。深度学习方法(LCP-CNN)是否优于多参数模型(Brock模型,Lung-RADS®)对不同患者的肺结节风险进行分类?结果与多参数模型相比,LCP-CNN在肺结节风险分类方面表现优异,对风险特征和结构性肺部疾病无显著影响。LCP-CNN提供了效率和准确性,解决了传统模型的局限性,例如手动测量的变化或缺乏患者数据,同时产生稳健的结果。因此,这些方法可能通过补充甚至取代目前的方法来影响临床工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信