Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ashraf Ahmed, Rasha Kaddoura, Abhinav Aggarwal, Tawanda Zinyandu, Fabricio Webber, Carlos Davila, Stuart Zarich
{"title":"Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ashraf Ahmed, Rasha Kaddoura, Abhinav Aggarwal, Tawanda Zinyandu, Fabricio Webber, Carlos Davila, Stuart Zarich","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The co-existence of severe aortic stenosis (AS) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is not uncommon. Surgical intervention is the gold standard management. Patients with high surgical risk might undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, TAVR outcomes are unclear in this population. We aimed to investigate the impact of HCM on the outcomes of TAVR.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aim to investigate the outcomes of TAVR in patients with HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus for studies that compared outcomes of TAVR procedure between patients with HCM and those without it. Using the random-effects model, the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 102 articles and identified three observational cohort studies. Compared to patients who underwent TAVR without underlying HCM, TAVR for AS co-existed with HCM was associated with higher rates of mortality (OR 5.79; 95% CI: 3.38; 9.91, p < 0.0001), cardiogenic shock (OR 4.55; 95% CI: 3.40; 6.08, p < 0.0001), aortic dissection (OR 4.95; 95% CI: 3.17; 7.74, p < 0.0001), vascular complications (OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.27; 3.47, p = 0.004), and renal impairment (OR 1.80; 95% CI: 1.36; 2.40, p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the comparison groups in terms of complete heart block, new permanent pacemaker implantation, or bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with severe AS and HCM, TAVR was associated with significantly higher occurrence of mortality, cardiogenic shock, aortic dissection, vascular complications, and renal impairment as well as the need for mechanical ventilation than patients who did not have HCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The co-existence of severe aortic stenosis (AS) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is not uncommon. Surgical intervention is the gold standard management. Patients with high surgical risk might undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, TAVR outcomes are unclear in this population. We aimed to investigate the impact of HCM on the outcomes of TAVR.

Aim: We aim to investigate the outcomes of TAVR in patients with HCM.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus for studies that compared outcomes of TAVR procedure between patients with HCM and those without it. Using the random-effects model, the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.

Results: We screened 102 articles and identified three observational cohort studies. Compared to patients who underwent TAVR without underlying HCM, TAVR for AS co-existed with HCM was associated with higher rates of mortality (OR 5.79; 95% CI: 3.38; 9.91, p < 0.0001), cardiogenic shock (OR 4.55; 95% CI: 3.40; 6.08, p < 0.0001), aortic dissection (OR 4.95; 95% CI: 3.17; 7.74, p < 0.0001), vascular complications (OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.27; 3.47, p = 0.004), and renal impairment (OR 1.80; 95% CI: 1.36; 2.40, p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the comparison groups in terms of complete heart block, new permanent pacemaker implantation, or bleeding.

Conclusion: In patients with severe AS and HCM, TAVR was associated with significantly higher occurrence of mortality, cardiogenic shock, aortic dissection, vascular complications, and renal impairment as well as the need for mechanical ventilation than patients who did not have HCM.

背景:严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)和肥厚型心肌病(HCM)并存的情况并不少见。手术治疗是治疗的金标准。手术风险高的患者可接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)。然而,经导管主动脉瓣置换术在这一人群中的疗效尚不明确。我们旨在研究 HCM 对 TAVR 结果的影响。目的:我们旨在研究 HCM 患者的 TAVR 结果:我们系统地检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus上比较HCM患者和非HCM患者TAVR疗效的研究。结果:我们筛选了102篇文章,发现了3篇观察性文章,其中1篇为研究性文章:我们筛选了 102 篇文章,确定了 3 项观察性队列研究。与接受 TAVR 而无基础 HCM 的患者相比,因强直性脊柱炎合并 HCM 而接受 TAVR 的患者死亡率更高(OR 5.79;95% CI:3.38;9.91,P):对于患有严重强直性脊柱炎和 HCM 的患者,TAVR 与死亡率、心源性休克、主动脉夹层、血管并发症、肾功能损伤以及机械通气需求相关性明显高于未患 HCM 的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信