Impact of Sheath Type on Vascular and Bleeding Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Post Hoc Analysis From the MARVEL Registry Study.

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31396

Emily Pan, Herbert G Kroon, Pim A L Tonino, Giovanni Amoroso, Mika Laine, Evald H Christiansen, Stefan Toggweiler, Jur Ten Berg, Markus Malmberg, Ton Slagboom, Noriaki Moriyama, Christian J Terkelsen, Federico Moccetti, Livia Gheorghe, Darra Bigelow, John Webb, David Wood, Nicholas Van Mieghem, Mikko Savontaus

{"title":"Impact of Sheath Type on Vascular and Bleeding Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Post Hoc Analysis From the MARVEL Registry Study.","authors":"Emily Pan, Herbert G Kroon, Pim A L Tonino, Giovanni Amoroso, Mika Laine, Evald H Christiansen, Stefan Toggweiler, Jur Ten Berg, Markus Malmberg, Ton Slagboom, Noriaki Moriyama, Christian J Terkelsen, Federico Moccetti, Livia Gheorghe, Darra Bigelow, John Webb, David Wood, Nicholas Van Mieghem, Mikko Savontaus","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vascular and bleeding complications remain a concern after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The impact of the sheath type on these complications remains unclear.Methods: The prospective MARVEL registry study analyzed enrolled 500 patients undergoing large-bore transfemoral procedures and arteriotomy closure with the MANTA vascular closure device from 10 hospitals in Europe and Canada. We stratified these patients according to type of sheath used (expandable or conventional). A propensity-matched analysis was performed using VARC-2 major or minor vascular and bleeding complications as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was time to hemostasis.Results: We identified 196 propensity-matched pairs. Major vascular complications occurred in 3.6% in the expandable sheath group and 4.1% in the conventional sheath group (p = 1.0). Minor vascular complications occurred in 5.6% in the expandable sheath group and 4.6% in the conventional sheath group (p = 0.819). There were no significant differences in bleeding complications between groups. Time to hemostasis after MANTA closure was significantly shorter in the expandable sheath group (30 vs. 60 s, p < 0.001).Conclusions: A propensity-matched analysis demonstrated no significant differences in vascular complication rates with MANTA arteriotomy closure after removal of large bore expandable or conventional sheaths. Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in the expandable sheath group.","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31396","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vascular and bleeding complications remain a concern after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The impact of the sheath type on these complications remains unclear.

Methods: The prospective MARVEL registry study analyzed enrolled 500 patients undergoing large-bore transfemoral procedures and arteriotomy closure with the MANTA vascular closure device from 10 hospitals in Europe and Canada. We stratified these patients according to type of sheath used (expandable or conventional). A propensity-matched analysis was performed using VARC-2 major or minor vascular and bleeding complications as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was time to hemostasis.

Results: We identified 196 propensity-matched pairs. Major vascular complications occurred in 3.6% in the expandable sheath group and 4.1% in the conventional sheath group (p = 1.0). Minor vascular complications occurred in 5.6% in the expandable sheath group and 4.6% in the conventional sheath group (p = 0.819). There were no significant differences in bleeding complications between groups. Time to hemostasis after MANTA closure was significantly shorter in the expandable sheath group (30 vs. 60 s, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: A propensity-matched analysis demonstrated no significant differences in vascular complication rates with MANTA arteriotomy closure after removal of large bore expandable or conventional sheaths. Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in the expandable sheath group.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 医学-心血管系统

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

8.70%

发文量

419

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.