Rapid quantitative PCR on tongue swabs for pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a prospective multicentre study.

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-02 Print Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1183/13993003.01493-2024
Yilin Wang, Junwei Cui, Yuanyuan Li, Miao Wang, Wenge Han, Aimei Liu, Furong Wang, Rongmei Liu, Shuhui Kang, Jianping Zhang, Sihong Zhu, Zhonghai Lai, Wenlong Guan, Shaomu Zou, Xiangyu Yin, JianZhi Qing, Guilan Mu, Liying Guan, Liang Li, Yu Pang
{"title":"Rapid quantitative PCR on tongue swabs for pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a prospective multicentre study.","authors":"Yilin Wang, Junwei Cui, Yuanyuan Li, Miao Wang, Wenge Han, Aimei Liu, Furong Wang, Rongmei Liu, Shuhui Kang, Jianping Zhang, Sihong Zhu, Zhonghai Lai, Wenlong Guan, Shaomu Zou, Xiangyu Yin, JianZhi Qing, Guilan Mu, Liying Guan, Liang Li, Yu Pang","doi":"10.1183/13993003.01493-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major cause of infectious disease mortality globally, with significant underdiagnosis perpetuating transmission. Tongue swab analysis has emerged as a promising non-invasive method for pulmonary TB diagnosis. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the TB-EASY quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay using tongue swab specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective multicentre study, conducted across seven designated TB hospitals in China, 729 participants were included in the analysis. Tongue swabs were tested using the new TB-EASY assay from Hugobiotech, while sputum samples were analysed by Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), smear and culture tests. Diagnostic performance was compared to a composite microbiological reference standard (MRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TB-EASY assay demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity of 89.6% and 96.2% compared to sputum Xpert, and 87.4% and 98.0% compared to the MRS. Sensitivity varied by bacterial load, ranging from 100% in high-load cases to 70.4% in very-low-load cases. The assay demonstrated robust performance in diverse epidemiological settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TB-EASY qPCR assay using tongue swabs offers a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic alternative for pulmonary TB, especially where sputum collection is challenging. Its potential for wider use in high TB burden settings warrants further validation in community-based studies. Limitations include potential overestimation of sensitivity due to the selection of symptomatic patients and the use of sputum Xpert rather than Xpert Ultra. Additionally, the performance in non-sputum-producing patients remains untested, and the cost-effectiveness should be further evaluated to assess the feasibility of its implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01493-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major cause of infectious disease mortality globally, with significant underdiagnosis perpetuating transmission. Tongue swab analysis has emerged as a promising non-invasive method for pulmonary TB diagnosis. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the TB-EASY quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay using tongue swab specimens.

Methods: In this prospective multicentre study, conducted across seven designated TB hospitals in China, 729 participants were included in the analysis. Tongue swabs were tested using the new TB-EASY assay from Hugobiotech, while sputum samples were analysed by Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), smear and culture tests. Diagnostic performance was compared to a composite microbiological reference standard (MRS).

Results: The TB-EASY assay demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity of 89.6% and 96.2% compared to sputum Xpert, and 87.4% and 98.0% compared to the MRS. Sensitivity varied by bacterial load, ranging from 100% in high-load cases to 70.4% in very-low-load cases. The assay demonstrated robust performance in diverse epidemiological settings.

Conclusions: The TB-EASY qPCR assay using tongue swabs offers a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic alternative for pulmonary TB, especially where sputum collection is challenging. Its potential for wider use in high TB burden settings warrants further validation in community-based studies. Limitations include potential overestimation of sensitivity due to the selection of symptomatic patients and the use of sputum Xpert rather than Xpert Ultra. Additionally, the performance in non-sputum-producing patients remains untested, and the cost-effectiveness should be further evaluated to assess the feasibility of its implementation.

舌拭子快速定量PCR检测成人肺结核:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
背景:结核病(TB)仍然是全球传染病死亡的主要原因,严重的诊断不足使传播持续下去。舌拭子分析已成为一种很有前途的非侵入性肺结核诊断方法。本研究利用舌拭子标本评估TB-EASY定量PCR (qPCR)检测的诊断准确性。方法:在这项前瞻性多中心研究中,在中国七家指定的结核病医院进行,729名参与者被纳入分析。使用Hugobiotech的新型TB-EASY检测舌拭子,而使用Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert)、涂片和培养测试分析痰样本。将诊断性能与复合微生物参考标准(MRS)进行比较。结果:TB-EASY检测具有较高的诊断准确性,与痰液Xpert相比敏感性和特异性分别为89.6%和96.2%,与mrs相比敏感性和特异性分别为87.4%和98.0%。敏感性随细菌负荷的变化而变化,高负荷病例为100%,极低负荷病例为70.4%。该分析在不同的流行病学环境中表现出强大的性能。结论:使用舌拭子的TB- easy qPCR检测为肺结核提供了一种可靠的、非侵入性的诊断选择,特别是在痰液收集具有挑战性的情况下。它在结核病高负担环境中更广泛使用的潜力值得在社区研究中进一步验证。局限性包括由于选择有症状的患者和使用痰液Xpert而不是Xpert Ultra而可能高估敏感性。此外,在无痰产生患者中的表现尚未得到检验,应进一步评估其成本效益,以评估其实施的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信