Device-Free Human Activity Recognition: A Systematic Literature Review

Majid Ghosian Moghaddam;Ali Asghar Nazari Shirehjini;Shervin Shirmohammadi
{"title":"Device-Free Human Activity Recognition: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Majid Ghosian Moghaddam;Ali Asghar Nazari Shirehjini;Shervin Shirmohammadi","doi":"10.1109/OJIM.2024.3502885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human activity recognition (HAR) has become a topic of interest in recent years. While device-based, object-tagged, and camera-based approaches to HAR have many advantages, device-free HAR offers new contributions to the field. Unlike device-based or object-tagged methods, it does not require users to carry sensory devices, and unlike camera-based methods, it respects privacy. Despite the significant number of original research studies and surveys on device-free HAR published in recent years, many scientific questions remain open. In this study, a systematic literature review on device-free HAR was conducted by exploring ACM, IEEExplore, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and WebOfScience. This mixed-method study assesses the quality of the reviewed papers and analyzes suggested HAR methods in both a scientometric and technical manner. The scientometric analysis investigates the trends of scientific publications in this field from the beginning of 2017 to the end of 2023 and reviews the types and distribution of publications among countries, universities, and media. The technical analysis categorizes methods based on device-free sensing modalities, the type, and granularity of recognized activities of proposed methods. It also discusses the common challenges and limitations of current device-free HAR approaches. Additionally, existing methods are compared based on their support for non-line-of-sight, multisubject, user-independent, and environment-independent recognition of human activities. This work provides foundational knowledge on each step of device-free HAR: data acquisition, preprocessing, classification, and evaluation, and identifies gaps and open questions in existing research.","PeriodicalId":100630,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Instrumentation and Measurement","volume":"4 ","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10766409","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Instrumentation and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10766409/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) has become a topic of interest in recent years. While device-based, object-tagged, and camera-based approaches to HAR have many advantages, device-free HAR offers new contributions to the field. Unlike device-based or object-tagged methods, it does not require users to carry sensory devices, and unlike camera-based methods, it respects privacy. Despite the significant number of original research studies and surveys on device-free HAR published in recent years, many scientific questions remain open. In this study, a systematic literature review on device-free HAR was conducted by exploring ACM, IEEExplore, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and WebOfScience. This mixed-method study assesses the quality of the reviewed papers and analyzes suggested HAR methods in both a scientometric and technical manner. The scientometric analysis investigates the trends of scientific publications in this field from the beginning of 2017 to the end of 2023 and reviews the types and distribution of publications among countries, universities, and media. The technical analysis categorizes methods based on device-free sensing modalities, the type, and granularity of recognized activities of proposed methods. It also discusses the common challenges and limitations of current device-free HAR approaches. Additionally, existing methods are compared based on their support for non-line-of-sight, multisubject, user-independent, and environment-independent recognition of human activities. This work provides foundational knowledge on each step of device-free HAR: data acquisition, preprocessing, classification, and evaluation, and identifies gaps and open questions in existing research.
无设备人类活动识别:系统文献综述
人体活动识别(HAR)是近年来研究的热点之一。虽然基于设备、对象标记和基于相机的HAR方法有许多优点,但无设备HAR为该领域提供了新的贡献。与基于设备或对象标记的方法不同,它不需要用户携带传感设备,而且与基于摄像头的方法不同,它尊重隐私。尽管近年来发表了大量关于无设备HAR的原创研究和调查,但许多科学问题仍未解决。本研究通过检索ACM、IEEExplore、ScienceDirect、Scopus和WebOfScience对无设备HAR进行了系统的文献综述。这项混合方法研究评估了被评审论文的质量,并从科学计量学和技术角度分析了建议的HAR方法。科学计量分析调查了从2017年初到2023年底该领域科学出版物的趋势,并回顾了出版物的类型和在国家、大学和媒体之间的分布。技术分析基于无设备传感模式、类型和所提出方法的识别活动的粒度对方法进行分类。它还讨论了当前无设备HAR方法的共同挑战和局限性。此外,比较了现有方法对人类活动的非视距识别、多主体识别、用户独立识别和环境独立识别的支持程度。这项工作为无设备HAR的每个步骤提供了基础知识:数据采集、预处理、分类和评估,并确定了现有研究中的差距和开放问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信