{"title":"Sensitivity Analysis and Performance Tradeoffs in Regression Neural Networks for Magnetic Field Sensing With Rectangular MOS Transistors","authors":"JangHyeon Lee;Yongkeun Lee","doi":"10.1109/JSEN.2024.3492048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the effectiveness of nonlinear regression (LR) machine learning (ML) models and custom neural networks (NNs) for regression tasks for magnetic field sensing using a rectangular MOS transistor. We focus on sensitivity and average percentage error (APE), comparing various models under controlled conditions with a gate-to-source voltage (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${V}_{\\text {GS}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n) of 1.2 V, a drain-to-source voltage (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${V}_{\\text {DS}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n) of 1.8 V, and an applied magnetic field of 1.4 mT. The empirical model establishes a baseline sensitivity of 5.0%, but its instability poses a significant challenge to reliable sensor performance. In contrast, K-nearest neighbors (KNNs), random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT) models demonstrate stable sensitivities around 8%. Notably, custom NNs achieve the highest sensitivity, approximately 10%, with stable performance and consistently low APE values around 2%. Key performance metrics such as mean squared error (mse), mean absolute error (MAE), and latency were analyzed. The results show that custom NNs, particularly smaller architectures, offer a compelling alternative to traditional models like KNNs and DT, balancing accuracy, stability, and computational efficiency. This highlights the potential of custom NNs to enhance sensor performance in real-world applications where instability can significantly impact the accuracy and reliability of regression tasks.","PeriodicalId":447,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"1851-1859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Journal","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10753445/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores the effectiveness of nonlinear regression (LR) machine learning (ML) models and custom neural networks (NNs) for regression tasks for magnetic field sensing using a rectangular MOS transistor. We focus on sensitivity and average percentage error (APE), comparing various models under controlled conditions with a gate-to-source voltage (
${V}_{\text {GS}}$
) of 1.2 V, a drain-to-source voltage (
${V}_{\text {DS}}$
) of 1.8 V, and an applied magnetic field of 1.4 mT. The empirical model establishes a baseline sensitivity of 5.0%, but its instability poses a significant challenge to reliable sensor performance. In contrast, K-nearest neighbors (KNNs), random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT) models demonstrate stable sensitivities around 8%. Notably, custom NNs achieve the highest sensitivity, approximately 10%, with stable performance and consistently low APE values around 2%. Key performance metrics such as mean squared error (mse), mean absolute error (MAE), and latency were analyzed. The results show that custom NNs, particularly smaller architectures, offer a compelling alternative to traditional models like KNNs and DT, balancing accuracy, stability, and computational efficiency. This highlights the potential of custom NNs to enhance sensor performance in real-world applications where instability can significantly impact the accuracy and reliability of regression tasks.
期刊介绍:
The fields of interest of the IEEE Sensors Journal are the theory, design , fabrication, manufacturing and applications of devices for sensing and transducing physical, chemical and biological phenomena, with emphasis on the electronics and physics aspect of sensors and integrated sensors-actuators. IEEE Sensors Journal deals with the following:
-Sensor Phenomenology, Modelling, and Evaluation
-Sensor Materials, Processing, and Fabrication
-Chemical and Gas Sensors
-Microfluidics and Biosensors
-Optical Sensors
-Physical Sensors: Temperature, Mechanical, Magnetic, and others
-Acoustic and Ultrasonic Sensors
-Sensor Packaging
-Sensor Networks
-Sensor Applications
-Sensor Systems: Signals, Processing, and Interfaces
-Actuators and Sensor Power Systems
-Sensor Signal Processing for high precision and stability (amplification, filtering, linearization, modulation/demodulation) and under harsh conditions (EMC, radiation, humidity, temperature); energy consumption/harvesting
-Sensor Data Processing (soft computing with sensor data, e.g., pattern recognition, machine learning, evolutionary computation; sensor data fusion, processing of wave e.g., electromagnetic and acoustic; and non-wave, e.g., chemical, gravity, particle, thermal, radiative and non-radiative sensor data, detection, estimation and classification based on sensor data)
-Sensors in Industrial Practice