Sensitivity Analysis and Performance Tradeoffs in Regression Neural Networks for Magnetic Field Sensing With Rectangular MOS Transistors

IF 4.3 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
JangHyeon Lee;Yongkeun Lee
{"title":"Sensitivity Analysis and Performance Tradeoffs in Regression Neural Networks for Magnetic Field Sensing With Rectangular MOS Transistors","authors":"JangHyeon Lee;Yongkeun Lee","doi":"10.1109/JSEN.2024.3492048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the effectiveness of nonlinear regression (LR) machine learning (ML) models and custom neural networks (NNs) for regression tasks for magnetic field sensing using a rectangular MOS transistor. We focus on sensitivity and average percentage error (APE), comparing various models under controlled conditions with a gate-to-source voltage (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${V}_{\\text {GS}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n) of 1.2 V, a drain-to-source voltage (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${V}_{\\text {DS}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n) of 1.8 V, and an applied magnetic field of 1.4 mT. The empirical model establishes a baseline sensitivity of 5.0%, but its instability poses a significant challenge to reliable sensor performance. In contrast, K-nearest neighbors (KNNs), random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT) models demonstrate stable sensitivities around 8%. Notably, custom NNs achieve the highest sensitivity, approximately 10%, with stable performance and consistently low APE values around 2%. Key performance metrics such as mean squared error (mse), mean absolute error (MAE), and latency were analyzed. The results show that custom NNs, particularly smaller architectures, offer a compelling alternative to traditional models like KNNs and DT, balancing accuracy, stability, and computational efficiency. This highlights the potential of custom NNs to enhance sensor performance in real-world applications where instability can significantly impact the accuracy and reliability of regression tasks.","PeriodicalId":447,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"1851-1859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Journal","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10753445/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of nonlinear regression (LR) machine learning (ML) models and custom neural networks (NNs) for regression tasks for magnetic field sensing using a rectangular MOS transistor. We focus on sensitivity and average percentage error (APE), comparing various models under controlled conditions with a gate-to-source voltage ( ${V}_{\text {GS}}$ ) of 1.2 V, a drain-to-source voltage ( ${V}_{\text {DS}}$ ) of 1.8 V, and an applied magnetic field of 1.4 mT. The empirical model establishes a baseline sensitivity of 5.0%, but its instability poses a significant challenge to reliable sensor performance. In contrast, K-nearest neighbors (KNNs), random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT) models demonstrate stable sensitivities around 8%. Notably, custom NNs achieve the highest sensitivity, approximately 10%, with stable performance and consistently low APE values around 2%. Key performance metrics such as mean squared error (mse), mean absolute error (MAE), and latency were analyzed. The results show that custom NNs, particularly smaller architectures, offer a compelling alternative to traditional models like KNNs and DT, balancing accuracy, stability, and computational efficiency. This highlights the potential of custom NNs to enhance sensor performance in real-world applications where instability can significantly impact the accuracy and reliability of regression tasks.
基于回归神经网络的矩形MOS晶体管磁场传感灵敏度分析及性能权衡
本研究探讨了非线性回归(LR)机器学习(ML)模型和自定义神经网络(nn)在使用矩形MOS晶体管进行磁场传感的回归任务中的有效性。我们重点研究了灵敏度和平均百分比误差(APE),在控制条件下比较了各种模型,栅源电压(${V}_{\text {GS}}$)为1.2 V,漏源电压(${V}_{\text {DS}}$)为1.8 V,外加磁场为1.4 mT。经验模型建立了5.0%的基线灵敏度,但其不稳定性对可靠的传感器性能构成了重大挑战。相比之下,k近邻(KNNs)、随机森林(RF)和决策树(DT)模型的灵敏度稳定在8%左右。值得注意的是,自定义神经网络的灵敏度最高,约为10%,性能稳定,APE值始终保持在2%左右。分析了均方误差(mse)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和延迟等关键性能指标。结果表明,定制神经网络,特别是较小的体系结构,在平衡精度、稳定性和计算效率方面,为knn和DT等传统模型提供了令人信服的替代方案。这凸显了自定义神经网络在现实应用中增强传感器性能的潜力,在现实应用中,不稳定性会显著影响回归任务的准确性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Sensors Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
2058
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: The fields of interest of the IEEE Sensors Journal are the theory, design , fabrication, manufacturing and applications of devices for sensing and transducing physical, chemical and biological phenomena, with emphasis on the electronics and physics aspect of sensors and integrated sensors-actuators. IEEE Sensors Journal deals with the following: -Sensor Phenomenology, Modelling, and Evaluation -Sensor Materials, Processing, and Fabrication -Chemical and Gas Sensors -Microfluidics and Biosensors -Optical Sensors -Physical Sensors: Temperature, Mechanical, Magnetic, and others -Acoustic and Ultrasonic Sensors -Sensor Packaging -Sensor Networks -Sensor Applications -Sensor Systems: Signals, Processing, and Interfaces -Actuators and Sensor Power Systems -Sensor Signal Processing for high precision and stability (amplification, filtering, linearization, modulation/demodulation) and under harsh conditions (EMC, radiation, humidity, temperature); energy consumption/harvesting -Sensor Data Processing (soft computing with sensor data, e.g., pattern recognition, machine learning, evolutionary computation; sensor data fusion, processing of wave e.g., electromagnetic and acoustic; and non-wave, e.g., chemical, gravity, particle, thermal, radiative and non-radiative sensor data, detection, estimation and classification based on sensor data) -Sensors in Industrial Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信