Crafting the perfect policy combination: Exploring the synergistic effects of dual-pilot energy policies on urban carbon emission efficiency

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Benhong Peng , Fei Gao
{"title":"Crafting the perfect policy combination: Exploring the synergistic effects of dual-pilot energy policies on urban carbon emission efficiency","authors":"Benhong Peng ,&nbsp;Fei Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy policy constitutes a critical instrument for environmental governance. Exploring the synergistic effects of government-led and market-incentivized energy policies, focusing on energy transition, is crucial for improving urban carbon emission efficiency. Based on panel data from 279 China's cities from 2006 to 2021, this study treats the dual-pilot policies of new energy demonstration city and energy-consuming rights trading system as a quasi-natural experiment, employing a Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to assess the policy effects of the dual-pilot energy policies (DPEPs) on urban carbon emission efficiency. The results show that DPEPs significantly enhance urban carbon emission efficiency, and compared to the single-pilot policy, DPEPs exhibit a more pronounced policy effect. These findings hold robust after multiple robustness checks. Mechanism analysis reveals that DPEPs improve urban carbon emission efficiency by optimizing industrial structure, enhancing energy efficiency, and promoting regional technological advancement. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the synergistic effect of DPEPs is related to geographical location, industrialization and economic level, with policy effects being more pronounced in cities located in the central and western regions and highly industrialized and economic development cities. In further analysis, this paper employs the spatial DID model to evaluate the spatial spillover effects of DPEPs, finding that the implementation of DPEPs significantly boosts the carbon emission efficiency of surrounding areas. This study has important implications for pilot cities integrating multiple energy policy combinations and accelerating urban low-carbon transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48626,"journal":{"name":"Urban Climate","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102260"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Climate","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212095524004577","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy policy constitutes a critical instrument for environmental governance. Exploring the synergistic effects of government-led and market-incentivized energy policies, focusing on energy transition, is crucial for improving urban carbon emission efficiency. Based on panel data from 279 China's cities from 2006 to 2021, this study treats the dual-pilot policies of new energy demonstration city and energy-consuming rights trading system as a quasi-natural experiment, employing a Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to assess the policy effects of the dual-pilot energy policies (DPEPs) on urban carbon emission efficiency. The results show that DPEPs significantly enhance urban carbon emission efficiency, and compared to the single-pilot policy, DPEPs exhibit a more pronounced policy effect. These findings hold robust after multiple robustness checks. Mechanism analysis reveals that DPEPs improve urban carbon emission efficiency by optimizing industrial structure, enhancing energy efficiency, and promoting regional technological advancement. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the synergistic effect of DPEPs is related to geographical location, industrialization and economic level, with policy effects being more pronounced in cities located in the central and western regions and highly industrialized and economic development cities. In further analysis, this paper employs the spatial DID model to evaluate the spatial spillover effects of DPEPs, finding that the implementation of DPEPs significantly boosts the carbon emission efficiency of surrounding areas. This study has important implications for pilot cities integrating multiple energy policy combinations and accelerating urban low-carbon transformation.
打造完美的政策组合:探索双试点能源政策对城市碳排放效率的协同效应
能源政策是环境治理的重要工具。以能源转型为重点,探索政府主导型和市场激励型能源政策的协同效应,对提高城市碳排放效率至关重要。本文基于2006 - 2021年279个中国城市的面板数据,将新能源示范城市和耗能权交易制度双试点政策作为准自然实验,采用差分法(DID)模型评估能源双试点政策对城市碳排放效率的政策效应。结果表明,dpep显著提高了城市碳排放效率,且与单一试点政策相比,dpep的政策效果更为明显。这些发现在多次稳健性检查后保持稳健性。机制分析表明,dpep通过优化产业结构、提高能源效率和促进区域技术进步来提高城市碳排放效率。异质性分析表明,dpep的协同效应与地理位置、工业化程度和经济水平有关,在中西部地区和工业化程度高、经济发达的城市,政策效应更为明显。在进一步分析中,本文采用空间DID模型对dpep的空间溢出效应进行了评价,发现dpep的实施显著提升了周边地区的碳排放效率。本研究对试点城市整合多种能源政策组合,加快城市低碳转型具有重要启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Climate
Urban Climate Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: Urban Climate serves the scientific and decision making communities with the publication of research on theory, science and applications relevant to understanding urban climatic conditions and change in relation to their geography and to demographic, socioeconomic, institutional, technological and environmental dynamics and global change. Targeted towards both disciplinary and interdisciplinary audiences, this journal publishes original research papers, comprehensive review articles, book reviews, and short communications on topics including, but not limited to, the following: Urban meteorology and climate[...] Urban environmental pollution[...] Adaptation to global change[...] Urban economic and social issues[...] Research Approaches[...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信