Yilun Qu , Yan Shi , Xu Wu , Minghui Zhu , Pengfei Zhu , Xiao Zhang , Shuangying Le , Yuan Ren , Jianyun Pan , Yixiang Wang
{"title":"Enhancing the carbon sequestration potential of urban green space: A water–energy–carbon fluxes perspective","authors":"Yilun Qu , Yan Shi , Xu Wu , Minghui Zhu , Pengfei Zhu , Xiao Zhang , Shuangying Le , Yuan Ren , Jianyun Pan , Yixiang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regulating carbon emissions during landscape maintenance is crucial for increasing net carbon sequestration in urban green spaces. This research focuses on balancing water and energy resource conservation with increasing carbon sequestration. We introduced an integrated water–energy–carbon (WEC) fluxes framework to evaluate the net carbon sequestration of green spaces and a water–energy–carbon sustainability index (WECSI) was developed to assess overall sustainability, emphasizing the carbon sequestration potential (CSP). Taking five types of urban green spaces at Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University as a case study, we observed significant differences in the WEC fluxes among the green space types. Specifically, mainly arbors and closed green space (AC) types had greater CSP due to scale effects, whereas mainly successional short grass and open green space (SGO) types were at risk of becoming net carbon sources. The WECSI analysis revealed the difficulties in simultaneously achieving water conservation, energy efficiency, and net carbon sequestration, with an average sustainability score of 0.57. To maximize CSP in urban green spaces, scenario analysis indicated that low-carbon irrigation practices could increase CSP by up to 25 %, whereas biomass energy from garden waste could reduce irrigation-related carbon emissions by 19 %. These findings provide a strong foundation for optimizing urban green space management to maximize CSP through WEC fluxes regulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 128652"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724004503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Regulating carbon emissions during landscape maintenance is crucial for increasing net carbon sequestration in urban green spaces. This research focuses on balancing water and energy resource conservation with increasing carbon sequestration. We introduced an integrated water–energy–carbon (WEC) fluxes framework to evaluate the net carbon sequestration of green spaces and a water–energy–carbon sustainability index (WECSI) was developed to assess overall sustainability, emphasizing the carbon sequestration potential (CSP). Taking five types of urban green spaces at Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University as a case study, we observed significant differences in the WEC fluxes among the green space types. Specifically, mainly arbors and closed green space (AC) types had greater CSP due to scale effects, whereas mainly successional short grass and open green space (SGO) types were at risk of becoming net carbon sources. The WECSI analysis revealed the difficulties in simultaneously achieving water conservation, energy efficiency, and net carbon sequestration, with an average sustainability score of 0.57. To maximize CSP in urban green spaces, scenario analysis indicated that low-carbon irrigation practices could increase CSP by up to 25 %, whereas biomass energy from garden waste could reduce irrigation-related carbon emissions by 19 %. These findings provide a strong foundation for optimizing urban green space management to maximize CSP through WEC fluxes regulation.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.