{"title":"Plastic particles and their additives promote plant invasion through physicochemical mechanisms on seed germination","authors":"Yudi M. Lozano, Lena Landt, Matthias C. Rillig","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>1 INTRODUCTION</h2>\n<p>Terrestrial biodiversity is rapidly decreasing as a consequence of several factors of global change, including soil pollution (IPBES, <span>2019</span>). Of particular concern is pollution with microplastics (plastic particles <5 mm), which is recognized as an important threat to ecosystems worldwide (Sigmund et al., <span>2023</span>). Microplastics can contaminate terrestrial systems through soil amendments, plastic mulching, irrigation, flooding, atmospheric input and littering or street run-off (Rochman et al., <span>2019</span>), with both positive and negative effects on plant–soil systems (Boots et al., <span>2019</span>; Huang et al., <span>2019</span>). For instance, in European grasslands, the biomass of the native species <i>Daucus carota</i> can increase in response to the presence of microplastic films in the soil (Huang et al., <span>2019</span>; Lozano, Lehnert, et al., <span>2021</span>). This effect is thought to occur because plastic particles could improve soil properties such as porosity and aeration (de Souza Machado et al., <span>2019</span>; Lozano, Aguilar-Trigueros, et al., <span>2021</span>). By contrast, the biomass of the native species <i>Lolium perenne</i> may decrease (Boots et al., <span>2019</span>), presumably due to toxic effects from microplastic leachates. However, not only are native plants affected by microplastics, invasive plants may potentially benefit from microplastic pollution due to traits that enhance their ability to thrive in polluted environments (Lozano & Rillig, <span>2024</span>). Research shows that microplastic fibres can enhance the growth of species of invasive character such as the range-expanding species <i>Calamagrostis epigejos</i> (Lozano & Rillig, <span>2020</span>). Microplastic beads can increase fine root biomass and photosynthesis efficiency in invasive plants compared to native species under dry–wet water cycles (Zhang et al., <span>2024</span>). Also, microplastic fragments may have negligible effects on the growth of the invasive plant <i>Solidago canadensis</i>, while having negative effects on its native counterpart <i>Solidago decurrens</i> (Li et al., <span>2024</span>). This advantage can be expected, as invasive species could benefit more from the novel environmental conditions created by microplastics, such as changes in soil water content, aeration, microbial activity and aggregation (de Souza Machado et al., <span>2019</span>; Lozano, Aguilar-Trigueros, et al., <span>2021</span>). In addition, invasive species can possess advantageous traits that might help them to avoid or better tolerate microplastic pollution (Lozano & Rillig, <span>2024</span>), enabling them to thrive in human-altered environments (Montesinos, <span>2021</span>), which are most likely the ones exposed to higher levels of plastic pollution. Nonetheless, microplastics can also inhibit the establishment of invasive plants like <i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> (Meng et al., <span>2023</span>), and in some cases, they may have stronger negative effects on invasive plant biomass compared to native plants (Fu et al., <span>2024</span>).</p>\n<p>Multiple strategies such as allelopathy, herbivory and propagule pressure—closely linked with seed germination—enable invasive species to outperform native species (Bennett et al., <span>2011</span>). While seed germination is critical for both native and invasive species, it plays a particular crucial role in the spread and establishment of invasive species (Daneshgar & Jose, <span>2009</span>; Gioria et al., <span>2018</span>). Invasive species often germinate faster and in greater proportions than native species (Guido et al., <span>2017</span>; Lozano et al., <span>2019</span>), with germination traits providing a key advantage in invasiveness (Moravcova et al., <span>2010</span>; Palma et al., <span>2021</span>). For example, species that germinate earlier can benefit from the early access to resources, space and reduced competition at initial stages of establishment (Gioria et al., <span>2018</span>), which has been observed to be of greater benefit to several invasive plants in comparison to native species (Dickson et al., <span>2012</span>). Additionally, synchronous germination plays a key role in the successful establishment of invasive species in novel environments (Gioria et al., <span>2018</span>), as it influences not only the post-germination conditions that native or invasive specs experience, but also key processes like flowering and pollination time, which ultimately affect their growth and survival within the community, and thus their invasion potential (Gioria et al., <span>2018</span>). The number of seeds that successfully germinate is another critical factor, as it directly influences plant population density and reproductive success, which is closely tied to the persistence of the seed bank in the soil—an important factor in the long-term success of invasive plant species (Gioria et al., <span>2021</span>). Nonetheless, the relationship between seed germination and plant invasion is complex and can vary across different dimensions such as spread rate, local abundance or environmental range (Palma et al., <span>2021</span>).</p>\n<p>Plant invasion could be exacerbated by the current global change scenarios (Dai et al., <span>2022</span>), in particular, by the presence of microplastics in the soil (Li et al., <span>2024</span>). Studies of microplastic effects on seed germination either in native or invasive species are rather scarce and suggest mostly negative effects. For instance, polystyrene particles may decrease germination rate of species such as <i>Lepidium sativum</i> (Bosker et al., <span>2019</span>; Pflugmacher et al., <span>2020</span>), while having negligible effects on wheat seeds (Lian et al., <span>2020</span>). Similarly, microplastics of different shapes may decrease velocity and increase synchrony of seed germination of native species like <i>Daucus carota</i> (Lozano et al., <span>2022</span>). Whether microplastics could promote the success of invasive plant species through their effects on seed germination parameters (e.g. promoting a faster and/or synchronous germination) remains a gap in our understanding.</p>\n<p>Microplastics could potentially alter seed germination through physical and/or chemical mechanisms, highlighting different modes of action (Lozano et al., <span>2022</span>). On the one hand, there could be a physical mechanism determined by the physical presence of microplastics (i.e. particles) in the soil, which may affect initial and later stages of seed germination through the blockage of seed pores (Bosker et al., <span>2019</span>), hypocotyl and/or radicle growth. However, plastic particles could improve soil properties such as porosity and aeration (de Souza Machado et al., <span>2019</span>; Lozano, Aguilar-Trigueros, et al., <span>2021</span>) with potential positive consequences on seed germination. On the other hand, a chemical mechanism determined by the leaching of additives and chemical substances into the soil could also affect seed germination. Toxic compounds associated with microplastics (Lithner et al., <span>2011</span>) can interfere with enzyme activity, such as amylase, which is essential for germination (Sethy & Gosh, <span>2013</span>), ultimately resulting in negative effects. Both physical and chemical effects have been shown to affect the root length of the aquatic plant <i>Lemna minor</i> (Boots et al., <span>2023</span>) and the growth of <i>Daucus carota</i> (Lozano, Perlenfein et al., <span>2024</span>). However, we have not yet disentangled physical and chemical effects of microplastics on seed germination, nor has it been determined whether they differentially affect native and invasive plant species, potentially increasing the competitive ability of invasive species.</p>\n<p>Thus, we evaluated the individual and combined effects of plastic particles and their additives on seed germination of native and invasive species in European grasslands. We aimed to (i) disentangle the physical (particles) and chemical (additives) effects of microplastics on seed germination and (ii) determine whether microplastics might enhance seed germination of invasive species over natives. Specifically, we hypothesized that the positive physical effects of plastic particles on soil properties would overcome the negative effects of seed pore blockage, thus promoting seed germination. By contrast, we hypothesized that the chemical additives from microplastics could have toxic effects on seeds, negatively affecting seed germination. Additionally, we hypothesized that invasive species, with their unique characteristics, might be better able to exploit the novel conditions created by microplastics compared to native species. To do so, we established a microcosm experiment where plastic particles (physical effect), additives (chemical effect) and their combined effect were evaluated on germination parameters of seven plant species (native and invasive) of grasslands in Germany. We evaluated seed germination parameters such as total germination, germination velocity and germination synchrony. We also determined the chemical additives released by plastics and their potential toxicity, by using different techniques, including untargeted LC-MS and ICP-OES analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14476","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
1 INTRODUCTION
Terrestrial biodiversity is rapidly decreasing as a consequence of several factors of global change, including soil pollution (IPBES, 2019). Of particular concern is pollution with microplastics (plastic particles <5 mm), which is recognized as an important threat to ecosystems worldwide (Sigmund et al., 2023). Microplastics can contaminate terrestrial systems through soil amendments, plastic mulching, irrigation, flooding, atmospheric input and littering or street run-off (Rochman et al., 2019), with both positive and negative effects on plant–soil systems (Boots et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2019). For instance, in European grasslands, the biomass of the native species Daucus carota can increase in response to the presence of microplastic films in the soil (Huang et al., 2019; Lozano, Lehnert, et al., 2021). This effect is thought to occur because plastic particles could improve soil properties such as porosity and aeration (de Souza Machado et al., 2019; Lozano, Aguilar-Trigueros, et al., 2021). By contrast, the biomass of the native species Lolium perenne may decrease (Boots et al., 2019), presumably due to toxic effects from microplastic leachates. However, not only are native plants affected by microplastics, invasive plants may potentially benefit from microplastic pollution due to traits that enhance their ability to thrive in polluted environments (Lozano & Rillig, 2024). Research shows that microplastic fibres can enhance the growth of species of invasive character such as the range-expanding species Calamagrostis epigejos (Lozano & Rillig, 2020). Microplastic beads can increase fine root biomass and photosynthesis efficiency in invasive plants compared to native species under dry–wet water cycles (Zhang et al., 2024). Also, microplastic fragments may have negligible effects on the growth of the invasive plant Solidago canadensis, while having negative effects on its native counterpart Solidago decurrens (Li et al., 2024). This advantage can be expected, as invasive species could benefit more from the novel environmental conditions created by microplastics, such as changes in soil water content, aeration, microbial activity and aggregation (de Souza Machado et al., 2019; Lozano, Aguilar-Trigueros, et al., 2021). In addition, invasive species can possess advantageous traits that might help them to avoid or better tolerate microplastic pollution (Lozano & Rillig, 2024), enabling them to thrive in human-altered environments (Montesinos, 2021), which are most likely the ones exposed to higher levels of plastic pollution. Nonetheless, microplastics can also inhibit the establishment of invasive plants like Amaranthus palmeri (Meng et al., 2023), and in some cases, they may have stronger negative effects on invasive plant biomass compared to native plants (Fu et al., 2024).
Multiple strategies such as allelopathy, herbivory and propagule pressure—closely linked with seed germination—enable invasive species to outperform native species (Bennett et al., 2011). While seed germination is critical for both native and invasive species, it plays a particular crucial role in the spread and establishment of invasive species (Daneshgar & Jose, 2009; Gioria et al., 2018). Invasive species often germinate faster and in greater proportions than native species (Guido et al., 2017; Lozano et al., 2019), with germination traits providing a key advantage in invasiveness (Moravcova et al., 2010; Palma et al., 2021). For example, species that germinate earlier can benefit from the early access to resources, space and reduced competition at initial stages of establishment (Gioria et al., 2018), which has been observed to be of greater benefit to several invasive plants in comparison to native species (Dickson et al., 2012). Additionally, synchronous germination plays a key role in the successful establishment of invasive species in novel environments (Gioria et al., 2018), as it influences not only the post-germination conditions that native or invasive specs experience, but also key processes like flowering and pollination time, which ultimately affect their growth and survival within the community, and thus their invasion potential (Gioria et al., 2018). The number of seeds that successfully germinate is another critical factor, as it directly influences plant population density and reproductive success, which is closely tied to the persistence of the seed bank in the soil—an important factor in the long-term success of invasive plant species (Gioria et al., 2021). Nonetheless, the relationship between seed germination and plant invasion is complex and can vary across different dimensions such as spread rate, local abundance or environmental range (Palma et al., 2021).
Plant invasion could be exacerbated by the current global change scenarios (Dai et al., 2022), in particular, by the presence of microplastics in the soil (Li et al., 2024). Studies of microplastic effects on seed germination either in native or invasive species are rather scarce and suggest mostly negative effects. For instance, polystyrene particles may decrease germination rate of species such as Lepidium sativum (Bosker et al., 2019; Pflugmacher et al., 2020), while having negligible effects on wheat seeds (Lian et al., 2020). Similarly, microplastics of different shapes may decrease velocity and increase synchrony of seed germination of native species like Daucus carota (Lozano et al., 2022). Whether microplastics could promote the success of invasive plant species through their effects on seed germination parameters (e.g. promoting a faster and/or synchronous germination) remains a gap in our understanding.
Microplastics could potentially alter seed germination through physical and/or chemical mechanisms, highlighting different modes of action (Lozano et al., 2022). On the one hand, there could be a physical mechanism determined by the physical presence of microplastics (i.e. particles) in the soil, which may affect initial and later stages of seed germination through the blockage of seed pores (Bosker et al., 2019), hypocotyl and/or radicle growth. However, plastic particles could improve soil properties such as porosity and aeration (de Souza Machado et al., 2019; Lozano, Aguilar-Trigueros, et al., 2021) with potential positive consequences on seed germination. On the other hand, a chemical mechanism determined by the leaching of additives and chemical substances into the soil could also affect seed germination. Toxic compounds associated with microplastics (Lithner et al., 2011) can interfere with enzyme activity, such as amylase, which is essential for germination (Sethy & Gosh, 2013), ultimately resulting in negative effects. Both physical and chemical effects have been shown to affect the root length of the aquatic plant Lemna minor (Boots et al., 2023) and the growth of Daucus carota (Lozano, Perlenfein et al., 2024). However, we have not yet disentangled physical and chemical effects of microplastics on seed germination, nor has it been determined whether they differentially affect native and invasive plant species, potentially increasing the competitive ability of invasive species.
Thus, we evaluated the individual and combined effects of plastic particles and their additives on seed germination of native and invasive species in European grasslands. We aimed to (i) disentangle the physical (particles) and chemical (additives) effects of microplastics on seed germination and (ii) determine whether microplastics might enhance seed germination of invasive species over natives. Specifically, we hypothesized that the positive physical effects of plastic particles on soil properties would overcome the negative effects of seed pore blockage, thus promoting seed germination. By contrast, we hypothesized that the chemical additives from microplastics could have toxic effects on seeds, negatively affecting seed germination. Additionally, we hypothesized that invasive species, with their unique characteristics, might be better able to exploit the novel conditions created by microplastics compared to native species. To do so, we established a microcosm experiment where plastic particles (physical effect), additives (chemical effect) and their combined effect were evaluated on germination parameters of seven plant species (native and invasive) of grasslands in Germany. We evaluated seed germination parameters such as total germination, germination velocity and germination synchrony. We also determined the chemical additives released by plastics and their potential toxicity, by using different techniques, including untargeted LC-MS and ICP-OES analyses.
由于全球变化的几个因素,包括土壤污染,陆地生物多样性正在迅速减少(IPBES, 2019)。特别值得关注的是微塑料(5毫米塑料颗粒)的污染,这被认为是对全球生态系统的重要威胁(Sigmund等人,2023)。微塑料可以通过土壤改良剂、塑料覆盖、灌溉、洪水、大气输入和垃圾或街道径流污染陆地系统(Rochman等人,2019),对植物-土壤系统既有积极影响,也有消极影响(Boots等人,2019;黄等人,2019)。例如,在欧洲草原,本地物种胡萝卜的生物量可以响应土壤中微塑料薄膜的存在而增加(Huang et al., 2019;Lozano, Lehnert等人,2021)。这种影响被认为是由于塑料颗粒可以改善土壤特性,如孔隙度和通气性(de Souza Machado等人,2019;Lozano, Aguilar-Trigueros等,2021)。相比之下,本地物种黑麦草(Lolium perenne)的生物量可能会减少(Boots等人,2019),可能是由于微塑料渗滤液的毒性作用。然而,不仅本地植物受到微塑料的影响,入侵植物也可能从微塑料污染中受益,因为它们具有增强其在污染环境中茁壮成长能力的特性(Lozano &;Rillig, 2024)。研究表明,微塑料纤维可以促进具有入侵特征的物种的生长,如扩展范围的物种Calamagrostis epigejos (Lozano &;Rillig, 2020)。与本地物种相比,在干湿水循环条件下,微塑料珠可以增加入侵植物细根生物量和光合效率(Zhang et al., 2024)。此外,微塑料碎片对入侵植物加拿大一枝黄花的生长影响可以忽略不计,而对本土植物黄花一枝黄花有负面影响(Li et al., 2024)。这一优势是可以预期的,因为入侵物种可以从微塑料造成的新环境条件中获益更多,例如土壤含水量、通气性、微生物活动和聚集的变化(de Souza Machado等人,2019;Lozano, Aguilar-Trigueros等,2021)。此外,入侵物种可能拥有一些有利的特征,这些特征可能有助于它们避免或更好地忍受微塑料污染(Lozano &;Rillig, 2024),使它们能够在人类改变的环境中茁壮成长(Montesinos, 2021),这些环境最有可能暴露在更高水平的塑料污染中。尽管如此,微塑料也可以抑制棕榈苋等入侵植物的建立(孟等,2023),在某些情况下,与本土植物相比,它们可能对入侵植物生物量产生更强的负面影响(Fu等,2024)。化感作用、草食压力和与种子发芽密切相关的繁殖压力等多种策略,使入侵物种的表现优于本地物种(Bennett et al., 2011)。虽然种子萌发对本土和入侵物种都至关重要,但它在入侵物种的传播和建立中起着特别关键的作用(Daneshgar &;何塞,2009;Gioria et al., 2018)。入侵物种通常比本地物种发芽更快,比例更大(Guido et al., 2017;Lozano et al., 2019),发芽特性在入侵性方面提供了关键优势(Moravcova et al., 2010;Palma et al., 2021)。例如,发芽较早的物种可以从早期获得资源、空间和在建立初期减少竞争中受益(Gioria等人,2018),与本地物种相比,已观察到这对几种入侵植物更有利(Dickson等人,2012)。此外,同步萌发在新环境中入侵物种的成功建立中起着关键作用(Gioria et al., 2018),因为它不仅影响本地或入侵物种经历的萌发后条件,还影响开花和授粉时间等关键过程,这些过程最终影响它们在群落中的生长和生存,从而影响它们的入侵潜力(Gioria et al., 2018)。成功发芽的种子数量是另一个关键因素,因为它直接影响植物种群密度和繁殖成功率,这与种子库在土壤中的持久性密切相关,这是入侵植物物种长期成功的重要因素(Gioria et al., 2021)。尽管如此,种子萌发与植物入侵之间的关系是复杂的,并且可以在不同的维度上发生变化,例如传播率、当地丰度或环境范围(Palma et al., 2021)。当前的全球变化情景可能加剧植物入侵(Dai et al., 2022),特别是土壤中存在微塑料(Li et al., 2024)。 关于微塑性对原生或入侵物种种子萌发影响的研究相当少,而且大多是负面影响。例如,聚苯乙烯颗粒可能会降低Lepidium sativum等物种的发芽率(Bosker等人,2019;Pflugmacher等人,2020),而对小麦种子的影响可以忽略不计(Lian等人,2020)。同样,不同形状的微塑料可能会降低本地物种(如Daucus carota)种子萌发的速度,并增加其同步(Lozano et al., 2022)。微塑料是否可以通过影响种子发芽参数(例如促进更快和/或同步发芽)来促进入侵植物物种的成功仍然是我们理解的空白。微塑料可能通过物理和/或化学机制潜在地改变种子发芽,突出不同的作用模式(Lozano et al., 2022)。一方面,土壤中微塑料(即颗粒)的物理存在可能决定了一种物理机制,它可能通过堵塞种子孔(Bosker et al., 2019)、下胚轴和/或胚根生长来影响种子萌发的初期和后期阶段。然而,塑料颗粒可以改善土壤特性,如孔隙度和通气(de Souza Machado等人,2019;Lozano, Aguilar-Trigueros等,2021)对种子萌发有潜在的积极影响。另一方面,添加剂和化学物质渗入土壤所决定的化学机制也会影响种子的萌发。与微塑料相关的有毒化合物(Lithner et al., 2011)可以干扰酶的活性,如淀粉酶,这是发芽所必需的(Sethy &;Gosh, 2013),最终导致负面影响。物理和化学效应已被证明会影响水生植物Lemna minor的根长(Boots et al., 2023)和Daucus carota的生长(Lozano, Perlenfein et al., 2024)。然而,我们尚未弄清微塑料对种子萌发的物理和化学影响,也未确定它们对本地和入侵植物物种的影响是否存在差异,是否有可能增加入侵物种的竞争能力。因此,我们评估了塑料颗粒及其添加剂对欧洲草原本地和入侵物种种子萌发的单独和联合影响。我们的目的是(i)解开微塑料对种子萌发的物理(颗粒)和化学(添加剂)影响,(ii)确定微塑料是否可能比本地物种更能促进入侵物种的种子萌发。具体来说,我们假设塑料颗粒对土壤性质的积极物理效应会克服种子孔堵塞的负面影响,从而促进种子萌发。相比之下,我们假设来自微塑料的化学添加剂可能对种子有毒性作用,对种子萌发产生负面影响。此外,我们假设,与本地物种相比,具有独特特征的入侵物种可能更能利用微塑料造成的新环境。为此,我们建立了一个微观世界实验,研究了塑料颗粒(物理效应)、添加剂(化学效应)及其联合作用对德国草原7种植物(本土和入侵)发芽参数的影响。我们评估了种子的萌发参数,如总萌发、萌发速度和萌发同步性。我们还通过使用不同的技术,包括非靶向LC-MS和ICP-OES分析,确定了塑料释放的化学添加剂及其潜在毒性。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants.
We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.