Development and validation of a risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics in northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1458457
Rahel Mulatie Anteneh, Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema, Ayenew Molla Lakew, Sefineh Fenta Feleke
{"title":"Development and validation of a risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics in northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study.","authors":"Rahel Mulatie Anteneh, Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema, Ayenew Molla Lakew, Sefineh Fenta Feleke","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1458457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse birth outcomes are unfavorable outcomes of pregnancy that are particularly common in low- and middle-income countries. At least one ultrasound is recommended to predict adverse birth outcomes in early pregnancy. However, in low-income countries, imaging equipment and trained manpower are scarce. According to our search of the literature, there is no validated risk prediction model for predicting adverse birth outcomes in Ethiopia. Hence, we developed and validated a model and risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy for use in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective follow-up study was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 31 May 2021, and a total of 910 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Stepwise, backward multivariable analysis was conducted. The model's accuracy was assessed using density plots, discrimination, and calibration. The developed model was assessed for internal validity using bootstrapping techniques and evaluated for clinical utility using decision curve analysis across various threshold probabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Premature rupture of Membrane, number of fetuses, residence, pregnancy-induced hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage, hemoglobin level, and labor onset remained in the final multivariable prediction model. The area under the curve of the model was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.812). The developed risk prediction model had a good performance and was well-calibrated and valid. The decision curve analysis indicated the model provides a higher net benefit across the ranges of threshold probabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, this study showed the possibility of predicting adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy. The risk prediction model using a simplified risk score helps identify high-risk pregnant women for specific interventions. A feasible score would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality and improve maternal and child health in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1458457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1458457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse birth outcomes are unfavorable outcomes of pregnancy that are particularly common in low- and middle-income countries. At least one ultrasound is recommended to predict adverse birth outcomes in early pregnancy. However, in low-income countries, imaging equipment and trained manpower are scarce. According to our search of the literature, there is no validated risk prediction model for predicting adverse birth outcomes in Ethiopia. Hence, we developed and validated a model and risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy for use in resource-limited settings.

Methods: A retrospective follow-up study was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 31 May 2021, and a total of 910 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Stepwise, backward multivariable analysis was conducted. The model's accuracy was assessed using density plots, discrimination, and calibration. The developed model was assessed for internal validity using bootstrapping techniques and evaluated for clinical utility using decision curve analysis across various threshold probabilities.

Results: Premature rupture of Membrane, number of fetuses, residence, pregnancy-induced hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage, hemoglobin level, and labor onset remained in the final multivariable prediction model. The area under the curve of the model was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.812). The developed risk prediction model had a good performance and was well-calibrated and valid. The decision curve analysis indicated the model provides a higher net benefit across the ranges of threshold probabilities.

Conclusion: In general, this study showed the possibility of predicting adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy. The risk prediction model using a simplified risk score helps identify high-risk pregnant women for specific interventions. A feasible score would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality and improve maternal and child health in low-resource settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信