The identification of low-pathogenic bacteria on removed spinal implants and implications for antimicrobial prophylaxis.

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.104152
Ann-Kathrin Joerger, Vicki M Butenschoen, Susanne Feihl, Sebastian Rühling, Jan S Kirschke, Bernhard Meyer, Sandro M Krieg
{"title":"The identification of low-pathogenic bacteria on removed spinal implants and implications for antimicrobial prophylaxis.","authors":"Ann-Kathrin Joerger, Vicki M Butenschoen, Susanne Feihl, Sebastian Rühling, Jan S Kirschke, Bernhard Meyer, Sandro M Krieg","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.104152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of low-pathogenic bacteria cultured from removed spinal implants is unclear and the efficacy of perioperative single-dose antibiotics against such bacteria remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>This study aims to investigate whether pedicle screw loosening is associated with pathogens and if the choice of perioperative antibiotics can prevent these bacteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 93 patients with implants removed between 01/01/2018 and 03/31/2020. Patients with both loosened and non-loosened implants were included. The latter group was subdivided into cases where implants were exchanged due to adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and those with elective implant removal after fracture healing. Bacterial cultures from removed implants were analyzed for resistance profiles against the prophylactic single-shot antibiotics administered during implantation. Patients with acute infection, spondylodiscitis, deep wound infection, empyema, and carbon/polyetheretherketone spinal implants were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacterial isolates were detected in both loosened (41%) and non-loosened (27%) implants (p = 0.23). The most frequently cultivated bacteria were <i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> and <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>. Sensitivity to the administered antibiotics was 75%. While <i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> was entirely sensitive, <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> was completely resistant. Patients with loosened implants without bacteria had a significantly lower bone mineral density (BMD) than patients with implants removed due to ASD. However, patients with loosened implants and positive bacterial cultures had comparable BMD to ASD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high rate of sensitive <i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> and resistant <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> on removed spinal implants suggests a need to revisit current antimicrobial prophylaxis. Further research is required to determine the clinical significance of low-virulence bacteria, especially on non-loosened implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"104152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.104152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The role of low-pathogenic bacteria cultured from removed spinal implants is unclear and the efficacy of perioperative single-dose antibiotics against such bacteria remains underexplored.

Research question: This study aims to investigate whether pedicle screw loosening is associated with pathogens and if the choice of perioperative antibiotics can prevent these bacteria.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 93 patients with implants removed between 01/01/2018 and 03/31/2020. Patients with both loosened and non-loosened implants were included. The latter group was subdivided into cases where implants were exchanged due to adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and those with elective implant removal after fracture healing. Bacterial cultures from removed implants were analyzed for resistance profiles against the prophylactic single-shot antibiotics administered during implantation. Patients with acute infection, spondylodiscitis, deep wound infection, empyema, and carbon/polyetheretherketone spinal implants were excluded.

Results: Bacterial isolates were detected in both loosened (41%) and non-loosened (27%) implants (p = 0.23). The most frequently cultivated bacteria were Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Sensitivity to the administered antibiotics was 75%. While Cutibacterium acnes was entirely sensitive, Staphylococcus epidermidis was completely resistant. Patients with loosened implants without bacteria had a significantly lower bone mineral density (BMD) than patients with implants removed due to ASD. However, patients with loosened implants and positive bacterial cultures had comparable BMD to ASD patients.

Conclusions: The high rate of sensitive Cutibacterium acnes and resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis on removed spinal implants suggests a need to revisit current antimicrobial prophylaxis. Further research is required to determine the clinical significance of low-virulence bacteria, especially on non-loosened implants.

切除脊柱植入物上低致病性细菌的鉴定及其对抗菌预防的影响。
导读:从取出的脊柱植入物中培养的低致病菌的作用尚不清楚,围手术期单剂量抗生素对此类细菌的疗效仍未得到充分研究。研究问题:本研究旨在探讨椎弓根螺钉松动是否与病原体有关,以及围手术期抗生素的选择是否可以预防这些细菌。方法:对2018年1月1日至2020年3月31日期间取出种植体的93例患者进行回顾性分析。包括松动种植体和非松动种植体的患者。后一组被细分为由于邻近节段退变(ASD)而更换假体的病例和骨折愈合后选择性取出假体的病例。从移除的种植体中进行细菌培养,分析其对种植期间给予的预防性单针抗生素的耐药性。排除急性感染、脊柱椎间盘炎、深创面感染、脓胸和碳/聚醚醚酮脊柱植入物患者。结果:松动种植体(41%)和未松动种植体(27%)均检出细菌分离株(p = 0.23)。最常培养的细菌是痤疮角质杆菌和表皮葡萄球菌。对所给抗生素的敏感性为75%。痤疮表皮杆菌完全敏感,而表皮葡萄球菌完全耐药。无细菌植入物松动患者的骨密度(BMD)明显低于因ASD而移除植入物的患者。然而,植入物松动且细菌培养阳性的患者骨密度与ASD患者相当。结论:在取出的脊柱植入物中,敏感的痤疮角质杆菌和耐药的表皮葡萄球菌的高比例表明需要重新考虑目前的抗菌预防措施。需要进一步的研究来确定低毒力细菌的临床意义,特别是在非松动种植体上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信