Embedding Specialised Educators in Modalities for Continuing Medical Education. A Study of Effectiveness, and Health Care Practitioner and Educator Preferences

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1111/tct.70013
Zoe Fehlberg, Janet C. Long, Anaita Kanga-Parabia, Alison D. Archibald, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Stephanie Best
{"title":"Embedding Specialised Educators in Modalities for Continuing Medical Education. A Study of Effectiveness, and Health Care Practitioner and Educator Preferences","authors":"Zoe Fehlberg,&nbsp;Janet C. Long,&nbsp;Anaita Kanga-Parabia,&nbsp;Alison D. Archibald,&nbsp;Jeffrey Braithwaite,&nbsp;Stephanie Best","doi":"10.1111/tct.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>As the delivery of continuing medical education moves towards digital modes, determining how to embed and capitalise on the skills of specialised educators in digital modalities is critical. Drawing on social theories of adult learning and behaviour change, this study trialled multiple delivery modes of education about reproductive genetic ‘carrier screening’ with varying levels of specialised educator (genetic counsellors) input to examine clinical effectiveness, and health care practitioners and educator preferences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A subset of health care practitioners (<i>n =</i> 209) interested in offering carrier screening through a large study were randomly allocated to receive education via face-to-face, a pre-recorded video or an online module, with active or passive educator input. The modes were evaluated using four levels of behaviour-linked outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The results of our study show that although face-to-face and a video modality with active educator input had the highest completion rates and impact on clinical practice, there was little difference across modes on self-reported behaviour change outcomes. The educators observed that there was no one-size-fits-all approach to education delivery and reported benefits and drawbacks to each. Going forward, 56% of health care practitioners considered an online mode of education delivery, such as videos, written material or both, to be viable approaches with options for ongoing educator support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Embedding highly specialised educators with ongoing support and incorporating aspects of social learning within functional digital platforms should be considered in the development of continuing medical education, especially for health care practitioners who may work in smaller and isolated clinics.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

As the delivery of continuing medical education moves towards digital modes, determining how to embed and capitalise on the skills of specialised educators in digital modalities is critical. Drawing on social theories of adult learning and behaviour change, this study trialled multiple delivery modes of education about reproductive genetic ‘carrier screening’ with varying levels of specialised educator (genetic counsellors) input to examine clinical effectiveness, and health care practitioners and educator preferences.

Methods

A subset of health care practitioners (n = 209) interested in offering carrier screening through a large study were randomly allocated to receive education via face-to-face, a pre-recorded video or an online module, with active or passive educator input. The modes were evaluated using four levels of behaviour-linked outcomes.

Findings

The results of our study show that although face-to-face and a video modality with active educator input had the highest completion rates and impact on clinical practice, there was little difference across modes on self-reported behaviour change outcomes. The educators observed that there was no one-size-fits-all approach to education delivery and reported benefits and drawbacks to each. Going forward, 56% of health care practitioners considered an online mode of education delivery, such as videos, written material or both, to be viable approaches with options for ongoing educator support.

Conclusion

Embedding highly specialised educators with ongoing support and incorporating aspects of social learning within functional digital platforms should be considered in the development of continuing medical education, especially for health care practitioners who may work in smaller and isolated clinics.

在继续医学教育模式中嵌入专业教育工作者。一项研究的有效性,卫生保健从业者和教育者的偏好。
导读:随着继续医学教育向数字化模式发展,确定如何在数字化模式中嵌入和利用专业教育工作者的技能至关重要。利用成人学习和行为改变的社会理论,本研究尝试了多种生殖遗传“携带者筛查”教育的交付模式,并采用不同水平的专业教育工作者(遗传咨询师)的投入来检查临床效果,以及卫生保健从业人员和教育工作者的偏好。方法:通过一项大型研究,对提供携带者筛查感兴趣的卫生保健从业人员(n = 209)被随机分配接受面对面、预先录制的视频或在线模块的教育,有主动或被动的教育者输入。使用行为相关结果的四个级别来评估这些模式。研究结果:我们的研究结果表明,尽管面对面和具有积极教育者输入的视频模式具有最高的完成率和对临床实践的影响,但在自我报告的行为改变结果上,不同模式之间的差异很小。教育工作者观察到,没有放之四海而皆准的教育方式,并报告了每种方式的利弊。展望未来,56%的卫生保健从业人员认为在线教育模式,如视频、书面材料或两者兼而有之,是可行的方法,可以选择持续的教育工作者支持。结论:在继续医学教育的发展中,应考虑为高度专业化的教育工作者提供持续的支持,并将社会学习的各个方面纳入功能性数字平台,特别是对可能在小型和孤立诊所工作的卫生保健从业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信