Adherence to positive airway pressure therapy in patients with Down syndrome: assessing cloud based monitoring data.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rakesh Bhattacharjee, Megan Warner, Brandon Nokes, Jeremy S Landeo Gutierrez, Zihan Chen, Milan D Amin, Atul Malhotra
{"title":"Adherence to positive airway pressure therapy in patients with Down syndrome: assessing cloud based monitoring data.","authors":"Rakesh Bhattacharjee, Megan Warner, Brandon Nokes, Jeremy S Landeo Gutierrez, Zihan Chen, Milan D Amin, Atul Malhotra","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in Down syndrome (DS) with many patients prescribed positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. This study evaluates PAP adherence and identifies factors influencing adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of electronic health records and cloud-based PAP therapy data from DS patients at Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA. Cloud data were evaluated cross-sectionally at 30- and 90-nights post-clinic visit and longitudinally in patients with ≥2 90-night data downloads. Outcomes included compliance (percentage of nights with ≥4 hours of use) and usage (percentage of nights with any PAP usage). The impact of demographic and PAP therapy factors (e.g., mask leak) on these outcomes was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>47 patients with DS with cloud-based PAP therapy data over a 90-night period and 46 over a 30-night period were analyzed. The mean age was 17.7±4.6 years (21 females). Median compliance was significantly higher at 30 nights (56.7%, IQR:0.0,90.8%) than at 90 nights (34.4%, IQR:0.0,86.7%) (p<0.05). Median usage did not differ between the 30-night and 90-night periods. Demographic characteristics and PAP therapy parameters were not associated with compliance or usage. Among the longitudinal cohort (n=32), median compliance was 69.7% (IQR:19.2,90.0%) and median usage was 78.2% (IQR:45.2,95.7%). Compared to an age- and sex-matched cohort without DS, patients with DS demonstrated higher PAP compliance (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses reveal that many DS patients successfully adhere to PAP therapy, challenging the misconception that they struggle with adherence and proving they may be as successful, if not more, than non-DS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11520","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in Down syndrome (DS) with many patients prescribed positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. This study evaluates PAP adherence and identifies factors influencing adherence.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of electronic health records and cloud-based PAP therapy data from DS patients at Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA. Cloud data were evaluated cross-sectionally at 30- and 90-nights post-clinic visit and longitudinally in patients with ≥2 90-night data downloads. Outcomes included compliance (percentage of nights with ≥4 hours of use) and usage (percentage of nights with any PAP usage). The impact of demographic and PAP therapy factors (e.g., mask leak) on these outcomes was also assessed.

Results: 47 patients with DS with cloud-based PAP therapy data over a 90-night period and 46 over a 30-night period were analyzed. The mean age was 17.7±4.6 years (21 females). Median compliance was significantly higher at 30 nights (56.7%, IQR:0.0,90.8%) than at 90 nights (34.4%, IQR:0.0,86.7%) (p<0.05). Median usage did not differ between the 30-night and 90-night periods. Demographic characteristics and PAP therapy parameters were not associated with compliance or usage. Among the longitudinal cohort (n=32), median compliance was 69.7% (IQR:19.2,90.0%) and median usage was 78.2% (IQR:45.2,95.7%). Compared to an age- and sex-matched cohort without DS, patients with DS demonstrated higher PAP compliance (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses reveal that many DS patients successfully adhere to PAP therapy, challenging the misconception that they struggle with adherence and proving they may be as successful, if not more, than non-DS patients.

唐氏综合征患者坚持气道正压治疗:评估基于云的监测数据。
研究目的:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)在唐氏综合征(DS)中很常见,许多患者使用气道正压(PAP)治疗。本研究评估PAP的依从性并确定影响依从性的因素。方法:回顾性分析来自加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥雷迪儿童医院DS患者的电子健康记录和基于云的PAP治疗数据。云数据在30天和90晚的门诊后进行横断面评估,并对90晚数据下载≥2次的患者进行纵向评估。结果包括依从性(使用≥4小时的天数百分比)和使用率(使用任何PAP的天数百分比)。还评估了人口统计学和PAP治疗因素(如口罩泄漏)对这些结果的影响。结果:分析了47例DS患者在90晚期间接受基于云的PAP治疗数据,46例在30晚期间接受数据。平均年龄17.7±4.6岁(女性21例)。30晚的中位依从性(56.7%,IQR:0.0,90.8%)显著高于90晚的中位依从性(34.4%,IQR:0.0,86.7%)。结论:横断和纵向分析显示,许多退行性椎体滑移患者成功坚持PAP治疗,挑战了他们难以坚持的误解,证明他们可能与非退行性椎体滑移患者一样成功,甚至更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信