Hyaluronic acid-based dermal substitute with stromal vascular fraction vs. partial thickness skin grafts for the treatment of intermediate-deep burns of the hand: a retrospective case-control study.

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01
M Maruccia, S Magistri, R Elia, G Maggio, G Giudice
{"title":"Hyaluronic acid-based dermal substitute with stromal vascular fraction vs. partial thickness skin grafts for the treatment of intermediate-deep burns of the hand: a retrospective case-control study.","authors":"M Maruccia, S Magistri, R Elia, G Maggio, G Giudice","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep intermediate burns of the hand are a challenge for both the functional and aesthetic result. In this study we compare the efficacy of early selective enzymatic escarolysis followed by the application of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) extracted from autologous adipose tissue on a dermal substitute scaffold (DS) versus reconstruction by partial thickness skin grafts (PTSG). We enrolled all patients admitted to our referral Burn Center from September 2020 to January 2022 with deep intermediate burns of the hands: clinical data were collected, then the first group of 4 patients were treated with PTSG surgical reconstruction, and the second group of 7 patients with DS+SVF. Subsequently, the morpho-functional and aesthetic outcome (with quickDASH and POSAS questionnaires), the healing time and the number of accesses in the operating room were evaluated. A total of 11 patients and 18 hands were treated in the period considered for the study. The mean TBSA was 22.5±15.2% in Group 1, 23.6±13.6% in Group 2; the mean age in Group 1 was 47.3±17.6 yo, in Group 2 51.4±16.3 yo. The mean follow up was 10±2.5 months. At six months qDASH and POSAS in Group 1 were: qDASH 53.4±2.5; OSAS 53.3±5.1; POSAS 51.3±4.3; in Group 2: qDASH 20.8±7.8; OSAS 19.7±8.1; POSAS 17.4±7.8. Group 1 had an average healing time of 75±15 days vs 20.4±9.3 days for Group 2, and 2.5±0.5vs1 accesses in the operating room. SVF combined with hyaluronic acid-based dermal substitute demonstrated a better morpho-functional and aesthetic outcome, and reduced patient healing time and accesses in the operating room compared to surgical partial thickness skin graft reconstruction in the treatment of intermediate-deep burns of the hand.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"37 4","pages":"305-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep intermediate burns of the hand are a challenge for both the functional and aesthetic result. In this study we compare the efficacy of early selective enzymatic escarolysis followed by the application of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) extracted from autologous adipose tissue on a dermal substitute scaffold (DS) versus reconstruction by partial thickness skin grafts (PTSG). We enrolled all patients admitted to our referral Burn Center from September 2020 to January 2022 with deep intermediate burns of the hands: clinical data were collected, then the first group of 4 patients were treated with PTSG surgical reconstruction, and the second group of 7 patients with DS+SVF. Subsequently, the morpho-functional and aesthetic outcome (with quickDASH and POSAS questionnaires), the healing time and the number of accesses in the operating room were evaluated. A total of 11 patients and 18 hands were treated in the period considered for the study. The mean TBSA was 22.5±15.2% in Group 1, 23.6±13.6% in Group 2; the mean age in Group 1 was 47.3±17.6 yo, in Group 2 51.4±16.3 yo. The mean follow up was 10±2.5 months. At six months qDASH and POSAS in Group 1 were: qDASH 53.4±2.5; OSAS 53.3±5.1; POSAS 51.3±4.3; in Group 2: qDASH 20.8±7.8; OSAS 19.7±8.1; POSAS 17.4±7.8. Group 1 had an average healing time of 75±15 days vs 20.4±9.3 days for Group 2, and 2.5±0.5vs1 accesses in the operating room. SVF combined with hyaluronic acid-based dermal substitute demonstrated a better morpho-functional and aesthetic outcome, and reduced patient healing time and accesses in the operating room compared to surgical partial thickness skin graft reconstruction in the treatment of intermediate-deep burns of the hand.

透明质酸真皮替代物与间质血管组分对比:部分厚度皮肤移植治疗手部中深度烧伤的回顾性病例对照研究
手部的深度中度烧伤对功能和美学结果都是一个挑战。在这项研究中,我们比较了从自体脂肪组织中提取的基质血管部分(SVF)应用于真皮替代支架(DS)和部分厚度皮肤移植(PTSG)重建的早期选择性酶促血管溶解的效果。我们将2020年9月至2022年1月转诊烧伤中心收治的手部深中度烧伤患者全部纳入研究,收集临床资料,第一组4例采用PTSG手术重建,第二组7例采用DS+SVF。随后,通过quickDASH和POSAS问卷对两组患者的形态功能和美学结果、愈合时间和手术通道数量进行评估。在研究期间,共有11名患者和18只手接受了治疗。1组TBSA平均值为22.5±15.2%,2组为23.6±13.6%;1组平均年龄为47.3±17.6岁,2组平均年龄为51.4±16.3岁。平均随访10±2.5个月。6个月时,第一组的qDASH和POSAS分别为:qDASH 53.4±2.5;群53.3±5.1;posa 51.3±4.3;第二组:qDASH 20.8±7.8;群19.7±8.1;posa 17.4±7.8。组1平均愈合时间为75±15天,组2平均愈合时间为20.4±9.3天,手术时间为2.5±0.5vs1。SVF联合透明质酸真皮替代物在治疗手部中深度烧伤中表现出更好的形态功能和美观效果,与手术部分厚度皮肤移植重建相比,减少了患者的愈合时间和在手术室的通道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信