Burn hypertrophy scarring assessment based on patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS).

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01
M H Oley, M C Oley, F L F G Langi, E S Sinaga, D F Gunawan, M Faruk
{"title":"Burn hypertrophy scarring assessment based on patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS).","authors":"M H Oley, M C Oley, F L F G Langi, E S Sinaga, D F Gunawan, M Faruk","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertrophic burn scars can occur due to imbalances in the healing process and affect quality of life. They can be assessed with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). This is an assessment instrument with both a patient scale and an observer scale. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the POSAS score to measure the quality of scars in evaluating burns that produce scar tissue. It also aimed to determine similarities in the assessment of scar tissue using the POSAS score according to observers and patients. This cross-sectional study had a sample of 30 patients, including 19 women (63%). Assessments were performed before the initial treatment procedure and 1 and 6 months after. The post-incision scar tissue assessment results using the POSAS instrument were expressed as a score: 5-50 (observer), 6-60 (patient), or 11-110 (both total). The highest degree of burns was superficial-mid-dermal (20 patients; 67%). The POSAS assessment by doctors and patients tended to be the same and decreased at both months 1 and 6 after the treatment procedure. The mean total score was 51.3 ± 12.1 before treatment, 44.2 ± 9.5 at month 1, and 30.3 ± 5.9 at month 6. This study shows that in evaluating burns that produce hypertrophic scars, similarities exist in the POSAS score according to observers and patients. Precautions at the beginning of the observation will affect the POSAS score.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"37 4","pages":"312-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypertrophic burn scars can occur due to imbalances in the healing process and affect quality of life. They can be assessed with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). This is an assessment instrument with both a patient scale and an observer scale. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the POSAS score to measure the quality of scars in evaluating burns that produce scar tissue. It also aimed to determine similarities in the assessment of scar tissue using the POSAS score according to observers and patients. This cross-sectional study had a sample of 30 patients, including 19 women (63%). Assessments were performed before the initial treatment procedure and 1 and 6 months after. The post-incision scar tissue assessment results using the POSAS instrument were expressed as a score: 5-50 (observer), 6-60 (patient), or 11-110 (both total). The highest degree of burns was superficial-mid-dermal (20 patients; 67%). The POSAS assessment by doctors and patients tended to be the same and decreased at both months 1 and 6 after the treatment procedure. The mean total score was 51.3 ± 12.1 before treatment, 44.2 ± 9.5 at month 1, and 30.3 ± 5.9 at month 6. This study shows that in evaluating burns that produce hypertrophic scars, similarities exist in the POSAS score according to observers and patients. Precautions at the beginning of the observation will affect the POSAS score.

烧伤肥厚性疤痕评估基于患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)。
增生性烧伤疤痕可发生由于不平衡的愈合过程和影响生活质量。他们可以用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)进行评估。这是一种既有患者量表又有观察者量表的评估工具。本研究旨在评估POSAS评分在评估产生瘢痕组织的烧伤时衡量疤痕质量的可靠性和有效性。它还旨在根据观察者和患者确定使用POSAS评分评估疤痕组织的相似性。这项横断面研究有30例患者,包括19例女性(63%)。评估分别在初始治疗前和治疗后1个月和6个月进行。使用POSAS仪器进行切口后瘢痕组织评估的结果以分数表示:5-50(观察者),6-60(患者)或11-110(总)。烧伤程度最高的是浅中皮区(20例;67%)。在治疗后的第1个月和第6个月,医生和患者的POSAS评估趋于相同并有所下降。治疗前平均总分为51.3±12.1分,第1个月为44.2±9.5分,第6个月为30.3±5.9分。本研究表明,在评估产生增生性疤痕的烧伤时,观察者和患者的POSAS评分存在相似性。观察开始时的注意事项会影响POSAS评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信