The combination of physiology and machine learning for prediction of CPAP pressure and residual AHI in OSA.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jui-En Lo, Christopher N Schmickl, Florin Vaida, Shamim Nemati, Karandeep Singh, Scott A Sands, Robert L Owens, Atul Malhotra, Jeremy E Orr
{"title":"The combination of physiology and machine learning for prediction of CPAP pressure and residual AHI in OSA.","authors":"Jui-En Lo, Christopher N Schmickl, Florin Vaida, Shamim Nemati, Karandeep Singh, Scott A Sands, Robert L Owens, Atul Malhotra, Jeremy E Orr","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Study Objectives:</b> Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however some people have residual respiratory events or require significantly higher CPAP pressure while on therapy. Our objective was to develop predictive models for CPAP outcomes and assess whether the inclusion of physiological traits enhances prediction. <b>Methods:</b> We constructed predictive models from baseline information for subsequent residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and optimal CPAP pressure. We compared models utilizing clinical variables with those incorporating both clinical and physiological factors. Furthermore, we assessed the performance of regression versus machine learning. All performances, including root mean square error (RSME), R-squared, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC), were evaluated using a five-fold cross validation with ten repeats. <b>Results:</b> For predicting residual AHI, random forest models outperformed regression models, and models that incorporated both clinical and physiological variables also outperformed models using only clinical variables across all performance metrics. Random forest using both clinical features and physiological traits achieved the best performance. In both regression and random forest models, central apnea index is found to be the most important feature in predicting residual AHI. For predicting CPAP pressure, there was no additional predictive value of physiological traits or random forest modeling. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings demonstrated that the combined use of clinical and physiological variables yields the most robust predictive models for residual AHI, with random forest models performing best. These findings support the notion that prediction of OSA therapy outcomes may be improved by more flexible models using machine learning, potentially in combination with physiology-based models.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objectives: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however some people have residual respiratory events or require significantly higher CPAP pressure while on therapy. Our objective was to develop predictive models for CPAP outcomes and assess whether the inclusion of physiological traits enhances prediction. Methods: We constructed predictive models from baseline information for subsequent residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and optimal CPAP pressure. We compared models utilizing clinical variables with those incorporating both clinical and physiological factors. Furthermore, we assessed the performance of regression versus machine learning. All performances, including root mean square error (RSME), R-squared, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC), were evaluated using a five-fold cross validation with ten repeats. Results: For predicting residual AHI, random forest models outperformed regression models, and models that incorporated both clinical and physiological variables also outperformed models using only clinical variables across all performance metrics. Random forest using both clinical features and physiological traits achieved the best performance. In both regression and random forest models, central apnea index is found to be the most important feature in predicting residual AHI. For predicting CPAP pressure, there was no additional predictive value of physiological traits or random forest modeling. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that the combined use of clinical and physiological variables yields the most robust predictive models for residual AHI, with random forest models performing best. These findings support the notion that prediction of OSA therapy outcomes may be improved by more flexible models using machine learning, potentially in combination with physiology-based models.

结合生理学和机器学习预测OSA患者CPAP压力和残留AHI。
研究目的:持续气道正压(CPAP)是治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的首选方法;但有些人在治疗期间会出现残余呼吸事件或需要更高的 CPAP 压力。我们的目标是建立 CPAP 效果预测模型,并评估纳入生理特征是否会增强预测效果。方法:我们根据基线信息构建了后续残余呼吸暂停-低通气指数 (AHI) 和最佳 CPAP 压力的预测模型。我们比较了使用临床变量的模型和同时包含临床和生理因素的模型。此外,我们还评估了回归与机器学习的性能。所有性能,包括均方根误差 (RSME)、R 方、准确度和曲线下面积 (AUC),均通过五倍交叉验证和十次重复进行评估。结果如下在预测残余 AHI 方面,随机森林模型的表现优于回归模型;在所有性能指标方面,包含临床和生理变量的模型也优于仅使用临床变量的模型。同时使用临床特征和生理特征的随机森林取得了最佳性能。在回归模型和随机森林模型中,中枢性呼吸暂停指数是预测残余 AHI 的最重要特征。在预测 CPAP 压力方面,生理特征和随机森林模型都没有额外的预测价值。结论:我们的研究结果表明,结合使用临床和生理变量可产生最稳健的残余 AHI 预测模型,其中随机森林模型表现最佳。这些研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即使用机器学习建立更灵活的模型,并有可能与基于生理学的模型相结合,可以改善对 OSA 治疗结果的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信