Body understanding measure for pregnancy scale (BUMPS): Psychometric properties and predictive validity with postpartum anxiety, depression and body appreciation among Italian peripartum women

IF 5.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
C. Grano , A. Zagaria , M. Spinoni , C. Singh Solorzano , V. Cazzato , E. Kirk , C. Preston
{"title":"Body understanding measure for pregnancy scale (BUMPS): Psychometric properties and predictive validity with postpartum anxiety, depression and body appreciation among Italian peripartum women","authors":"C. Grano ,&nbsp;A. Zagaria ,&nbsp;M. Spinoni ,&nbsp;C. Singh Solorzano ,&nbsp;V. Cazzato ,&nbsp;E. Kirk ,&nbsp;C. Preston","doi":"10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pregnancy is a unique phase in a woman's life marked by profound physical transformations, including changes in body shape and weight. The Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy Scale (BUMPs) was designed to assess body image during pregnancy. Despite its increasing use, the scale has not yet been adapted into Italian, and evidence regarding its predictive validity with respect to anxiety, depression, and body appreciation is lacking. This study aimed to address these gaps to validate the Italian BUMPs and test its predictive validity. A community sample of 726 Italian pregnant women was recruited (age range 18–48, M<sub>age</sub>= 31.3 ± 4.79). Participants completed a translated BUMPs and other self-report questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, and body appreciation. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure for the BUMPs, with dimensions assessing <em>Satisfaction with Appearing Pregnant, Weight Gain Concerns</em>, and <em>Physical Burdens of Pregnancy</em>. BUMPs subscales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (ω = 0.765–0.866). Cross-sectional analysis revealed that BUMPs scores correlated with anxiety (<em>r</em> range from 0.25 to 0.32), depression (<em>r</em> range from 0.31 to 0.34), and gestational body mass index (<em>r</em> range from 0.18 to 0.37). Longitudinal analysis associated BUMPs with anxiety, depression, and body appreciation measured after childbirth, providing evidence of predictive validity. Overall, the present study supports the BUMPs as a valid and reliable tool for assessing body image during pregnancy within the Italian context. Additionally, it provides the first evidence of the BUMPs' predictive validity for postpartum mental health outcomes and body appreciation after childbirth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48312,"journal":{"name":"Body Image","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 101847"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body Image","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144524001694","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pregnancy is a unique phase in a woman's life marked by profound physical transformations, including changes in body shape and weight. The Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy Scale (BUMPs) was designed to assess body image during pregnancy. Despite its increasing use, the scale has not yet been adapted into Italian, and evidence regarding its predictive validity with respect to anxiety, depression, and body appreciation is lacking. This study aimed to address these gaps to validate the Italian BUMPs and test its predictive validity. A community sample of 726 Italian pregnant women was recruited (age range 18–48, Mage= 31.3 ± 4.79). Participants completed a translated BUMPs and other self-report questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, and body appreciation. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure for the BUMPs, with dimensions assessing Satisfaction with Appearing Pregnant, Weight Gain Concerns, and Physical Burdens of Pregnancy. BUMPs subscales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (ω = 0.765–0.866). Cross-sectional analysis revealed that BUMPs scores correlated with anxiety (r range from 0.25 to 0.32), depression (r range from 0.31 to 0.34), and gestational body mass index (r range from 0.18 to 0.37). Longitudinal analysis associated BUMPs with anxiety, depression, and body appreciation measured after childbirth, providing evidence of predictive validity. Overall, the present study supports the BUMPs as a valid and reliable tool for assessing body image during pregnancy within the Italian context. Additionally, it provides the first evidence of the BUMPs' predictive validity for postpartum mental health outcomes and body appreciation after childbirth.
妊娠身体理解量表(BUMPS):意大利围产期妇女产后焦虑、抑郁和身体欣赏的心理测量特征及其预测效度。
怀孕是女性一生中一个独特的阶段,标志着深刻的身体变化,包括体型和体重的变化。妊娠期身体认知量表(BUMPs)旨在评估怀孕期间的身体形象。尽管该量表的使用越来越多,但它还没有被改编成意大利语,而且缺乏关于它在焦虑、抑郁和身体欣赏方面的预测有效性的证据。本研究旨在解决这些差距,以验证意大利bump并测试其预测有效性。招募了726名意大利社区孕妇(年龄18-48岁,Mage= 31.3 ± 4.79)。参与者完成了翻译的BUMPs和其他自我报告问卷,评估焦虑,抑郁和身体欣赏。验证性因子分析支持BUMPs的三因素结构,维度评估对怀孕的满意度,体重增加的担忧和怀孕的身体负担。BUMPs子量表具有令人满意的内部一致性(ω = 0.765-0.866)。横断面分析显示,BUMPs评分与焦虑(r范围为0.25至0.32),抑郁(r范围为0.31至0.34)和妊娠体重指数(r范围为0.18至0.37)相关。纵向分析将肿块与分娩后测量的焦虑、抑郁和身体欣赏联系起来,提供了预测有效性的证据。总的来说,本研究支持bump作为评估意大利怀孕期间身体形象的有效和可靠的工具。此外,它提供了bump对产后心理健康结果和分娩后身体欣赏的预测有效性的第一个证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Body Image
Body Image Multiple-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
28.80%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Body Image is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality, scientific articles on body image and human physical appearance. Body Image is a multi-faceted concept that refers to persons perceptions and attitudes about their own body, particularly but not exclusively its appearance. The journal invites contributions from a broad range of disciplines-psychological science, other social and behavioral sciences, and medical and health sciences. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, theoretical and review papers, and science-based practitioner reports of interest. Dissertation abstracts are also published online, and the journal gives an annual award for the best doctoral dissertation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信