Protecting Distress Migrants' Right to Health in Ecuador: Are Legal Commitments Being Fulfilled?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health and Human Rights Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Mariana Pinto-Alvarez, Irene Torres, Daniel F López-Cevallos
{"title":"Protecting Distress Migrants' Right to Health in Ecuador: Are Legal Commitments Being Fulfilled?","authors":"Mariana Pinto-Alvarez, Irene Torres, Daniel F López-Cevallos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecuador's legal framework promises equitable access to health care for all. However, gaps in coverage are being exacerbated by the nearly 500,000 Venezuelan distress migrants remaining in the country over the past decade. The purpose of our study was to examine how the Ecuadorian health system responds to the needs of migrant populations arriving in poor health conditions. We conducted 28 key informant interviews with government officials, health care providers, and representatives of international cooperation agencies and migrant organizations, and analyzed documents from a related Constitutional Court sentence. We find that despite Ecuador's commitments, significant gaps exist in the implementation of protection mechanisms for distress migrants. Systemic obstacles, such as documentation requirements and exclusion from benefits granted by law, remain. Discriminatory practices and concerns about the allocation of limited resources can further impede access. The Constitutional Court case underscores how the judicialization of health may prompt the government to address distress migrants' right to health and document its progress. Ultimately, more comprehensive approaches are needed to promote a more equitable health system that addresses the specific experiences and needs of distress migrants in Ecuador.</p>","PeriodicalId":46953,"journal":{"name":"Health and Human Rights","volume":"26 2","pages":"121-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecuador's legal framework promises equitable access to health care for all. However, gaps in coverage are being exacerbated by the nearly 500,000 Venezuelan distress migrants remaining in the country over the past decade. The purpose of our study was to examine how the Ecuadorian health system responds to the needs of migrant populations arriving in poor health conditions. We conducted 28 key informant interviews with government officials, health care providers, and representatives of international cooperation agencies and migrant organizations, and analyzed documents from a related Constitutional Court sentence. We find that despite Ecuador's commitments, significant gaps exist in the implementation of protection mechanisms for distress migrants. Systemic obstacles, such as documentation requirements and exclusion from benefits granted by law, remain. Discriminatory practices and concerns about the allocation of limited resources can further impede access. The Constitutional Court case underscores how the judicialization of health may prompt the government to address distress migrants' right to health and document its progress. Ultimately, more comprehensive approaches are needed to promote a more equitable health system that addresses the specific experiences and needs of distress migrants in Ecuador.

保护厄瓜多尔困境移民的健康权:法律承诺是否得到履行?
厄瓜多尔的法律框架承诺所有人都能公平获得医疗保健。然而,在过去十年中,仍有近50万委内瑞拉贫困移民留在该国,这加剧了覆盖范围的差距。我们研究的目的是检查厄瓜多尔卫生系统如何应对健康状况不佳的移民人口的需求。我们与政府官员、卫生保健提供者以及国际合作机构和移民组织的代表进行了28次主要举报人访谈,并分析了相关宪法法院判决的文件。我们发现,尽管厄瓜多尔作出了承诺,但在实施对遇险移民的保护机制方面存在重大差距。系统性障碍,如证件要求和被排除在法律所给予的福利之外,仍然存在。歧视性做法和对有限资源分配的关切会进一步阻碍获得。宪法法院的案件突出表明,健康问题的司法化可能促使政府解决困境移徙者的健康权问题,并记录其进展。最终,需要更全面的方法来促进更公平的卫生系统,以解决厄瓜多尔痛苦移民的具体经历和需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Human Rights
Health and Human Rights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Human Rights began publication in 1994 under the editorship of Jonathan Mann, who was succeeded in 1997 by Sofia Gruskin. Paul Farmer, co-founder of Partners In Health, assumed the editorship in 2007. After more than a decade as a leading forum of debate on global health and rights concerns, Health and Human Rights made a significant new transition to an online, open access publication with Volume 10, Issue Number 1, in the summer of 2008. While continuing the journal’s print-only tradition of critical scholarship, Health and Human Rights, now available as both print and online text, provides an inclusive forum for action-oriented dialogue among human rights practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信