Developing a community advisory board to combat ageism: process and preliminary outcomes.

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dana P Urbanski, Elma B Johnson, Robbin Frazier, Maby Almiron, Steve Chapman, Tedla Kefene, Amina Keinan, Phyllis Thomas, Joseph E Gaugler, Tetyana P Shippee
{"title":"Developing a community advisory board to combat ageism: process and preliminary outcomes.","authors":"Dana P Urbanski, Elma B Johnson, Robbin Frazier, Maby Almiron, Steve Chapman, Tedla Kefene, Amina Keinan, Phyllis Thomas, Joseph E Gaugler, Tetyana P Shippee","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2024.2447064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ageism - stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination based on chronological age - is a highly prevalent yet underrecognized form of social discrimination with detrimental effects on healthy aging. Combating ageism is essential for creating an age-friendly society; however, there is no consensus on the optimal approach for doing so. In this manuscript, we posit that community-based participatory research holds promise for addressing and reframing <i>community-level</i> ageism, especially in underserved minoritized communities. To this end, we offer an implementable, adaptable process and model for building community-academic partnerships to combat ageism in diverse communities - using as an example the grassroots anti-ageist work of the University of Minnesota Center for Healthy Aging and Innovation's (CHAI's) Community Advisory Board (CAB). Here, we describe the formation and structure of the CHAI CAB, as well as the development, activities, and preliminary outcomes of its strategic initiative to create a community-led toolkit of resources for combating ageism in diverse cultural communities of the Twin Cities region of Minnesota. We believe our model can be useful for geriatric practitioners and educators to 1) uplift and empower diverse older adults in their communities; 2) promote health equity for underserved populations; and 3) provide rich community-based and experiential learning opportunities for future aging scholars and professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2024.2447064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ageism - stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination based on chronological age - is a highly prevalent yet underrecognized form of social discrimination with detrimental effects on healthy aging. Combating ageism is essential for creating an age-friendly society; however, there is no consensus on the optimal approach for doing so. In this manuscript, we posit that community-based participatory research holds promise for addressing and reframing community-level ageism, especially in underserved minoritized communities. To this end, we offer an implementable, adaptable process and model for building community-academic partnerships to combat ageism in diverse communities - using as an example the grassroots anti-ageist work of the University of Minnesota Center for Healthy Aging and Innovation's (CHAI's) Community Advisory Board (CAB). Here, we describe the formation and structure of the CHAI CAB, as well as the development, activities, and preliminary outcomes of its strategic initiative to create a community-led toolkit of resources for combating ageism in diverse cultural communities of the Twin Cities region of Minnesota. We believe our model can be useful for geriatric practitioners and educators to 1) uplift and empower diverse older adults in their communities; 2) promote health equity for underserved populations; and 3) provide rich community-based and experiential learning opportunities for future aging scholars and professionals.

建立社区咨询委员会以打击年龄歧视:过程和初步结果。
年龄歧视——基于实足年龄的陈规定型观念、偏见和歧视——是一种非常普遍但未得到充分认识的社会歧视形式,对健康老龄化产生不利影响。打击对长者的歧视,是缔造长者友善社会的关键;然而,对于这样做的最佳方法没有达成共识。在本文中,我们认为基于社区的参与性研究有望解决和重建社区层面的年龄歧视,特别是在服务不足的少数群体社区。为此,我们提供了一个可实施的、适应性强的过程和模式,用于建立社区-学术合作伙伴关系,以在不同社区中打击年龄歧视——以明尼苏达大学健康老龄化与创新中心(CHAI)社区咨询委员会(CAB)的基层反年龄歧视工作为例。在这里,我们描述CHAI CAB的形成和结构,以及其战略倡议的发展、活动和初步成果,该倡议旨在创建一个社区主导的资源工具包,以打击明尼苏达州双城地区不同文化社区的年龄歧视。我们相信,我们的模式对老年医学从业者和教育工作者很有用,可以帮助他们:1)提升社区中各种各样的老年人的能力;2)促进服务不足人群的卫生公平;3)为未来的老龄化学者和专业人士提供丰富的社区和体验式学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信