[Identification and Analysis of Irregular Antibodies in Hospitalized Patients Prepared to Accept Blood Transfusion].

Q4 Medicine
Jing Li, Xin Xu, Chun-Feng Li, Xue-Ying Zhao, Xin Lu
{"title":"[Identification and Analysis of Irregular Antibodies in Hospitalized Patients Prepared to Accept Blood Transfusion].","authors":"Jing Li, Xin Xu, Chun-Feng Li, Xue-Ying Zhao, Xin Lu","doi":"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.06.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the type and distribution characteristics of irregular antibodies in 71 847 hospitalized patients who prepared to accept blood transfusion, and to explore their role in safe blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>71 847 patients who applied for red blood transfusion from January 2020 to October 2023 were selected. All specimens were screened and identified for the irregular antibody by microcolumn gel antiglobulin technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 71 847 patients preparing for accept blood transfusion, 301 cases tested positive for irregular antibodies(0.42%). Of these 301 antibody-positive patients, 252 (83.72%) exhibited alloantibodies. The Rh blood group system was the most common, accounting for 179 cases (59.47%). Antibodies in Rh blood group system included anti-E (135,44.85%), anti-E + c (24,7.97%), anti-C + e (10,3.32%), anti-c (6,1.99%), anti-D (3,1.00%), and anti-D + C (1,0.33%). By analyzing 301 cases with irregular antibodies, it found the positive rate of >60 years old group was higher than that in ≤60 years old (0.61% <i>vs</i> 0.33%), female group was higher than that in male group (0.50% <i>vs</i> 0.31%), internal medicine and gynaecology and obstetrics groups were both higher than that in surgery group (1.25% <i>vs</i> 0.20%; 0.32% <i>vs</i> 0.20%), group with pregnancy/transfusion history was higher than that in non-pregnancy/transfusion history (0.64% <i>vs</i> 0.13%), the differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the routine monitoring of the blood group, it is necessary to detect RhE, so as to reduce the positive rate of irregular antibodies greatly and further ensure the safety of blood transfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":35777,"journal":{"name":"中国实验血液学杂志","volume":"32 6","pages":"1865-1868"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实验血液学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.06.035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the type and distribution characteristics of irregular antibodies in 71 847 hospitalized patients who prepared to accept blood transfusion, and to explore their role in safe blood transfusion.

Methods: 71 847 patients who applied for red blood transfusion from January 2020 to October 2023 were selected. All specimens were screened and identified for the irregular antibody by microcolumn gel antiglobulin technique.

Results: Among the 71 847 patients preparing for accept blood transfusion, 301 cases tested positive for irregular antibodies(0.42%). Of these 301 antibody-positive patients, 252 (83.72%) exhibited alloantibodies. The Rh blood group system was the most common, accounting for 179 cases (59.47%). Antibodies in Rh blood group system included anti-E (135,44.85%), anti-E + c (24,7.97%), anti-C + e (10,3.32%), anti-c (6,1.99%), anti-D (3,1.00%), and anti-D + C (1,0.33%). By analyzing 301 cases with irregular antibodies, it found the positive rate of >60 years old group was higher than that in ≤60 years old (0.61% vs 0.33%), female group was higher than that in male group (0.50% vs 0.31%), internal medicine and gynaecology and obstetrics groups were both higher than that in surgery group (1.25% vs 0.20%; 0.32% vs 0.20%), group with pregnancy/transfusion history was higher than that in non-pregnancy/transfusion history (0.64% vs 0.13%), the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: In the routine monitoring of the blood group, it is necessary to detect RhE, so as to reduce the positive rate of irregular antibodies greatly and further ensure the safety of blood transfusion.

住院准备输血患者不规则抗体的鉴定与分析
目的:分析71 847例住院准备输血患者不规则抗体的类型及分布特点,探讨其在安全输血中的作用。方法:选取2020年1月~ 2023年10月申请输血的患者71 847例。采用微柱凝胶抗球蛋白技术对所有标本进行不规则抗体筛选和鉴定。结果:71 847例准备输血患者中,不规则抗体阳性301例(0.42%)。301例抗体阳性患者中,252例(83.72%)出现同种异体抗体。Rh血型最多见,179例(59.47%)。Rh血型系统抗体包括抗e(135,44.85%)、抗e + c(24,7.97%)、抗c + e(10,3.32%)、抗c(6,1.99%)、抗d(3,1.00%)、抗d + c(1,0.33%)。通过对301例不规则抗体的分析,发现>60岁组阳性率高于≤60岁组(0.61%比0.33%),女性组阳性率高于男性组(0.50%比0.31%),内科和妇产科组阳性率均高于手术组(1.25%比0.20%;有妊娠/输血史组高于无妊娠/输血史组(0.64% vs 0.13%),差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:在血型的常规监测中,有必要检测RhE,以大大降低不规则抗体的阳性率,进一步保证输血的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国实验血液学杂志
中国实验血液学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7331
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信