[Efficacy and Safety of Flumatinib and Imatinib as First-line Treatments for Newly-diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A Real-world Study].

Q4 Medicine
Liang Zhang, Hong Deng, Yu Liu, Tai-Ran Chen, Mei-Jiao Huang, Hong-Yan Wang, Xing-Li Zou
{"title":"[Efficacy and Safety of Flumatinib and Imatinib as First-line Treatments for Newly-diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A Real-world Study].","authors":"Liang Zhang, Hong Deng, Yu Liu, Tai-Ran Chen, Mei-Jiao Huang, Hong-Yan Wang, Xing-Li Zou","doi":"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of flumatinib (FM) and imatinib (IM) as first-line treatment in newly-diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in real world.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 84 newly-diagnosed CP-CML patients in our center from December 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 32 cases received FM as first-line treatment, and 52 cases received IM. Molecular response (MR), disease progression, survival and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months of treatment, the incidences of early molecular response (EMR), MR2.0 and MR3.0 were 96.7%, 70.0% and 20.0% in FM group, respectively, which were significantly higher than 77.1%, 29.2% and 0 in IM group (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). At 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment, the incidences of major molecular response (MMR) in FM group were 68.2%, 85.7% and 90.0%, respectively, which were significantly higher than 22.9%, 34.0% and 51.1% in IM group (all <i>P</i> < 0.01). The median time to achieve MMR in FM group was 6(6-9) months, which was significantly shorter than 18(12-22) months in IM group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The 3-year progression-free survival rate and 3-year event-free survival rate in FM group were 100% and 68.8%, respectively, while in IM group were 98.1% and 55.8%. There were no significant differences between the two groups ( <i>P</i> >0.05). The incidence of grade 3-4 hematologic AEs in FM group was 21.9%, which was slightly lower than 25.0% in IM group, but the difference was not significant ( <i>P</i> >0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real clinical practice, FM as first-line treatment achieves MMR earlier than IM, and exhibits good safety profile in newly-diagnosed CML-CP patients, which potentially leads to improved long-term survival and treatment-free remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":35777,"journal":{"name":"中国实验血液学杂志","volume":"32 6","pages":"1676-1681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实验血液学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.06.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of flumatinib (FM) and imatinib (IM) as first-line treatment in newly-diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in real world.

Methods: A total of 84 newly-diagnosed CP-CML patients in our center from December 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 32 cases received FM as first-line treatment, and 52 cases received IM. Molecular response (MR), disease progression, survival and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups.

Results: At 3 months of treatment, the incidences of early molecular response (EMR), MR2.0 and MR3.0 were 96.7%, 70.0% and 20.0% in FM group, respectively, which were significantly higher than 77.1%, 29.2% and 0 in IM group (all P < 0.05). At 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment, the incidences of major molecular response (MMR) in FM group were 68.2%, 85.7% and 90.0%, respectively, which were significantly higher than 22.9%, 34.0% and 51.1% in IM group (all P < 0.01). The median time to achieve MMR in FM group was 6(6-9) months, which was significantly shorter than 18(12-22) months in IM group (P < 0.001). The 3-year progression-free survival rate and 3-year event-free survival rate in FM group were 100% and 68.8%, respectively, while in IM group were 98.1% and 55.8%. There were no significant differences between the two groups ( P >0.05). The incidence of grade 3-4 hematologic AEs in FM group was 21.9%, which was slightly lower than 25.0% in IM group, but the difference was not significant ( P >0.05).

Conclusion: In real clinical practice, FM as first-line treatment achieves MMR earlier than IM, and exhibits good safety profile in newly-diagnosed CML-CP patients, which potentially leads to improved long-term survival and treatment-free remission.

[氟马替尼和伊马替尼作为一线治疗新诊断慢性髓系白血病慢行期的疗效和安全性:一项现实世界研究]。
目的:比较氟马替尼(FM)和伊马替尼(IM)作为一线治疗新诊断慢性髓系白血病慢行期(CML-CP)患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2019年12月至2022年12月我中心84例新诊断的CP-CML患者。其中,fm32例为一线治疗,IM 52例。比较两组患者的分子反应(MR)、疾病进展、生存和不良事件发生率(ae)。结果:治疗3个月时,FM组早期分子反应(EMR)、MR2.0和MR3.0的发生率分别为96.7%、70.0%和20.0%,显著高于IM组的77.1%、29.2%和0(均P < 0.05)。治疗6、9、12个月时,FM组主要分子反应(MMR)发生率分别为68.2%、85.7%、90.0%,显著高于IM组的22.9%、34.0%、51.1%(均P < 0.01)。FM组实现MMR的中位时间为6(6-9)个月,显著短于IM组的18(12-22)个月(P < 0.001)。FM组3年无进展生存率和3年无事件生存率分别为100%和68.8%,IM组3年无进展生存率分别为98.1%和55.8%。两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。FM组3-4级血液学不良事件发生率为21.9%,略低于IM组25.0%,但差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:在实际临床实践中,FM作为一线治疗比IM更早达到MMR,并且在新诊断的CML-CP患者中表现出良好的安全性,有可能提高长期生存和无治疗缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国实验血液学杂志
中国实验血液学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7331
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信