Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation to Support a Change in the FDA-Labeled Dosing Frequency of RHB-105 Low-Dose Rifabutin Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication.

IF 2.9 4区 医学
Nimish Vakil, Colin W Howden, Shailja C Shah, Kuan-Fu Chen, Elliot Offman, June S Almenoff, Kely L Sheldon
{"title":"Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation to Support a Change in the FDA-Labeled Dosing Frequency of RHB-105 Low-Dose Rifabutin Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication.","authors":"Nimish Vakil, Colin W Howden, Shailja C Shah, Kuan-Fu Chen, Elliot Offman, June S Almenoff, Kely L Sheldon","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient adherence is vital for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Simplifying therapy dosing schedules may promote patient adherence, enhance treatment success rates, and help mitigate the development of antibiotic resistance. We aimed to assess plasma and intragastric rifabutin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole concentrations comparing two dosing schedules of RHB-105 (every 8 h and a more flexible three-times daily schedule, at 8 a.m., 12 p.m., and 6 p.m.) using a validated physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Leveraging in vitro and in vivo information on the pharmacokinetics of the three components of RHB-105, we developed mechanistic absorption PBPK models to predict plasma and intragastric concentration-time profiles for each component. There were only negligible differences in the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC) for plasma and the intragastric compartment, and maximal concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) with only up to a 1.1-fold difference for rifabutin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole between dosing schedules. Overlapping 90% confidence intervals for both AUC and C<sub>max</sub> support that overall exposures are comparable regardless of dosing every 8 h or three-times daily for all three drugs. Drug exposure was highly similar for rifabutin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole with each dosing schedule. Novel mechanistic absorption PBPK modeling supports the approval and use of the more flexible dosing schedule for RHB-105, simplifying patient experience and potentially increasing adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.6178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient adherence is vital for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Simplifying therapy dosing schedules may promote patient adherence, enhance treatment success rates, and help mitigate the development of antibiotic resistance. We aimed to assess plasma and intragastric rifabutin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole concentrations comparing two dosing schedules of RHB-105 (every 8 h and a more flexible three-times daily schedule, at 8 a.m., 12 p.m., and 6 p.m.) using a validated physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Leveraging in vitro and in vivo information on the pharmacokinetics of the three components of RHB-105, we developed mechanistic absorption PBPK models to predict plasma and intragastric concentration-time profiles for each component. There were only negligible differences in the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC) for plasma and the intragastric compartment, and maximal concentration (Cmax) with only up to a 1.1-fold difference for rifabutin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole between dosing schedules. Overlapping 90% confidence intervals for both AUC and Cmax support that overall exposures are comparable regardless of dosing every 8 h or three-times daily for all three drugs. Drug exposure was highly similar for rifabutin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole with each dosing schedule. Novel mechanistic absorption PBPK modeling supports the approval and use of the more flexible dosing schedule for RHB-105, simplifying patient experience and potentially increasing adherence.

基于生理学的药代动力学建模和模拟,支持fda标记的RHB-105低剂量利福布汀三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌给药频率的变化。
患者的依从性对于根除幽门螺杆菌至关重要。简化治疗给药方案可以促进患者的依从性,提高治疗成功率,并有助于减轻抗生素耐药性的发展。我们的目的是评估血浆和胃内利福布汀、阿莫西林和奥美拉唑的浓度,比较RHB-105的两种给药方案(每8小时一次,以及更灵活的每日三次给药方案,分别在上午8点、下午12点和下午6点),使用经过验证的基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型。利用RHB-105三种成分的体外和体内药代动力学信息,我们建立了机制吸收PBPK模型来预测每种成分的血浆和胃内浓度-时间分布。在血浆和胃腔室的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)和最大浓度(Cmax)上,利福布汀、阿莫西林和奥美拉唑在给药方案之间的差异仅为1.1倍。AUC和Cmax的90%置信区间重叠表明,无论这三种药物是每8小时给药还是每天给药3次,总的暴露量都是相当的。利福布汀、阿莫西林和奥美拉唑在每种给药方案下的药物暴露高度相似。新的机制吸收PBPK模型支持RHB-105更灵活的给药方案的批准和使用,简化患者体验并可能增加依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信