{"title":"Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Recurrence and Overall Survival Following Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"MohmmadAmin Omrani, Abbas Basiri, Mehran Rahimlou","doi":"10.22037/uj.v21i.8459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Positive surgical margins (PSM) following partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are a concern due to potential implications for recurrence and survival. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the impact of PSM on recurrence rates and progression-free survival in RCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception through July 2024. Studies examining recurrence and survival outcomes in RCC patients with and without PSM post-PN were included. A random-effects model was applied to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for recurrence and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed that PSM was significantly associated with a higher risk of local recurrence (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.67-2.72) and a lower recurrence/progression-free survival (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.40-2.07) compared to negative surgical margins. Subgroup analyses indicated consistent results across study designs and RCC histologic subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of PSM following PN for RCC is associated with a 2.13-fold increase in local recurrence and a 1.7-fold reduction in progression-free survival, emphasizing the need for precise margin management during surgery. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing surgical techniques and considering adjuvant treatment strategies for patients with PSM to improve oncologic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v21i.8459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Positive surgical margins (PSM) following partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are a concern due to potential implications for recurrence and survival. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the impact of PSM on recurrence rates and progression-free survival in RCC patients.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception through July 2024. Studies examining recurrence and survival outcomes in RCC patients with and without PSM post-PN were included. A random-effects model was applied to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for recurrence and survival.
Results: Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed that PSM was significantly associated with a higher risk of local recurrence (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.67-2.72) and a lower recurrence/progression-free survival (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.40-2.07) compared to negative surgical margins. Subgroup analyses indicated consistent results across study designs and RCC histologic subtypes.
Conclusion: The presence of PSM following PN for RCC is associated with a 2.13-fold increase in local recurrence and a 1.7-fold reduction in progression-free survival, emphasizing the need for precise margin management during surgery. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing surgical techniques and considering adjuvant treatment strategies for patients with PSM to improve oncologic outcomes.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist.
Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.