Clinical application of targeted next-generation sequencing utilizing bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in thoracic surgery ICU patients with suspected pulmonary infections.

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Xiaobo Guo, Nianlin Xie, Xiaotong Xi, Pei Li, Jianbo Jia, Lianhong Chen, Mingzhi Ren, Yaping Wang, Peipei Zhang, Wanglong Deng, Yan Wang, Pengyu Jing, Ran Ding, Zhongping Gu
{"title":"Clinical application of targeted next-generation sequencing utilizing bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in thoracic surgery ICU patients with suspected pulmonary infections.","authors":"Xiaobo Guo, Nianlin Xie, Xiaotong Xi, Pei Li, Jianbo Jia, Lianhong Chen, Mingzhi Ren, Yaping Wang, Peipei Zhang, Wanglong Deng, Yan Wang, Pengyu Jing, Ran Ding, Zhongping Gu","doi":"10.1093/jambio/lxae313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in identifying pathogens from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in thoracic surgery ICU patients, offering additional diagnostic methods for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We collected clinical data from patients with suspected pulmonary infections in the thoracic surgery ICU of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University. A total of 50 patients were enrolled in this study. Traditional pathogen detection (TPD), involving culture and loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for 12 pathogens, along with tNGS, was employed for pathogen identification in BALF samples. Our findings demonstrated that the positive rate of tNGS was significantly greater than that of TPD (96% vs. 68%). Among the 50 samples analyzed, tNGS identified a total of 165 pathogens, whereas TPD detected only 48 pathogens. The TPD method primarily detected bacteria and fungi, whereas tNGS exhibited broader capabilities, identifying 104 cases with bacteria, 19 with fungi, 34 with DNA viruses, and 8 with RNA viruses. Notably, tNGS displayed enhanced efficiency in detecting atypical pathogens such as fungi, DNA viruses and RNA viruses. Furthermore, compared with TPD, tNGS demonstrated superior sensitivity (95.83% vs. 68.75%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>tNGS technology, characterized by its high sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness, holds great promise as a reliable diagnostic tool for assessing pulmonary infections in the thoracic surgery ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in identifying pathogens from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in thoracic surgery ICU patients, offering additional diagnostic methods for clinical practice.

Methods and results: We collected clinical data from patients with suspected pulmonary infections in the thoracic surgery ICU of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University. A total of 50 patients were enrolled in this study. Traditional pathogen detection (TPD), involving culture and loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for 12 pathogens, along with tNGS, was employed for pathogen identification in BALF samples. Our findings demonstrated that the positive rate of tNGS was significantly greater than that of TPD (96% vs. 68%). Among the 50 samples analyzed, tNGS identified a total of 165 pathogens, whereas TPD detected only 48 pathogens. The TPD method primarily detected bacteria and fungi, whereas tNGS exhibited broader capabilities, identifying 104 cases with bacteria, 19 with fungi, 34 with DNA viruses, and 8 with RNA viruses. Notably, tNGS displayed enhanced efficiency in detecting atypical pathogens such as fungi, DNA viruses and RNA viruses. Furthermore, compared with TPD, tNGS demonstrated superior sensitivity (95.83% vs. 68.75%).

Conclusions: tNGS technology, characterized by its high sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness, holds great promise as a reliable diagnostic tool for assessing pulmonary infections in the thoracic surgery ICU patients.

支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)靶向新一代测序(tNGS)在胸外科ICU疑似肺部感染患者中的临床应用
目的:本前瞻性研究的目的是评估靶向下一代测序(tNGS)在胸外科ICU患者支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中鉴定病原体的诊断价值,为临床实践提供额外的诊断方法。方法与结果:收集空军医科大学第二附属医院胸外科ICU疑似肺部感染患者的临床资料。共有50名患者参加了这项研究。采用传统病原体检测(TPD),包括培养和环介导等温扩增(LAMP)检测12种病原体,以及tNGS,对BALF样品进行病原体鉴定。我们的研究结果表明,tNGS的阳性率明显高于TPD(96%比68%)。在分析的50份样本中,tNGS共鉴定出165种病原体,而TPD仅检测出48种病原体。TPD方法主要检测细菌和真菌,而tNGS方法表现出更广泛的能力,鉴定出104例细菌,19例真菌,34例DNA病毒和8例RNA病毒。值得注意的是,tNGS在检测真菌、DNA病毒和RNA病毒等非典型病原体方面表现出更高的效率。此外,与TPD相比,tNGS表现出更高的灵敏度(95.83%对68.75%)。结论:TNGS技术具有高灵敏度、特异性和高性价比的特点,有望成为评估胸外科ICU患者肺部感染的可靠诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Journal of Applied Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.50%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信