Assessing chest radiographic quality and the influence of COVID-19 pathology: the Australian experience.

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Peter O'Reilly, Dania Abu Awwad, Sarah Lewis, Ernest Ekpo, Warren Reed
{"title":"Assessing chest radiographic quality and the influence of COVID-19 pathology: the Australian experience.","authors":"Peter O'Reilly, Dania Abu Awwad, Sarah Lewis, Ernest Ekpo, Warren Reed","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality assurance (QA) in medical imaging ensures consistently high-quality images at acceptable radiation doses. However, the applicability of the chest X-ray (CXR) QA tool in images with pathology, particularly infectious diseases like COVID-19, has not been explored. This study examines the utility of the European Guidelines for image quality in QA of CXRs with varying severity and types of infectious disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenient sampling methodology was employed to recruit 25 participants (qualified radiographers: n = 13 and 4th-year undergraduate radiography students: n = 12) to evaluate 70 CXR images using the European Guidelines for image quality in CXRs. The image dataset comprised of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases, which were randomly selected to reflect routine clinical practice variability. Participants independently rated image quality based on 10 criteria in the European guidelines on quality criteria for CXRs using a six-point Likert scale. Image quality ratings of normal and pathological CXR images were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman's ranked order correlation was used to assess the association between quality criteria ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CXRs with no pathology or non-COVID pathologies exhibited statistically higher total QA scores compared to CXRs with COVID-19 and indeterminate COVID-19 (P < 0.001). This trend was evident across various QA factors, especially those associated with patient inspiration. Higher levels of infection corresponded to lower QA ratings. No differences were found between different pathologies regarding the medial border of the scapulae being outside the lung fields.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Severe pathology negatively impacts the technical quality of CXRs with COVID-19 features without necessarily affecting their diagnostic value. The findings emphasise the need to prioritise diagnostic ability over technical quality when evaluating CXRs exhibiting diffuse signs of pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Quality assurance (QA) in medical imaging ensures consistently high-quality images at acceptable radiation doses. However, the applicability of the chest X-ray (CXR) QA tool in images with pathology, particularly infectious diseases like COVID-19, has not been explored. This study examines the utility of the European Guidelines for image quality in QA of CXRs with varying severity and types of infectious disease.

Methods: A convenient sampling methodology was employed to recruit 25 participants (qualified radiographers: n = 13 and 4th-year undergraduate radiography students: n = 12) to evaluate 70 CXR images using the European Guidelines for image quality in CXRs. The image dataset comprised of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases, which were randomly selected to reflect routine clinical practice variability. Participants independently rated image quality based on 10 criteria in the European guidelines on quality criteria for CXRs using a six-point Likert scale. Image quality ratings of normal and pathological CXR images were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman's ranked order correlation was used to assess the association between quality criteria ratings.

Results: CXRs with no pathology or non-COVID pathologies exhibited statistically higher total QA scores compared to CXRs with COVID-19 and indeterminate COVID-19 (P < 0.001). This trend was evident across various QA factors, especially those associated with patient inspiration. Higher levels of infection corresponded to lower QA ratings. No differences were found between different pathologies regarding the medial border of the scapulae being outside the lung fields.

Conclusions: Severe pathology negatively impacts the technical quality of CXRs with COVID-19 features without necessarily affecting their diagnostic value. The findings emphasise the need to prioritise diagnostic ability over technical quality when evaluating CXRs exhibiting diffuse signs of pathology.

评估胸片质量和COVID-19病理学的影响:澳大利亚的经验。
医学成像的质量保证(QA)确保在可接受的辐射剂量下始终如一的高质量图像。然而,胸部x线(CXR) QA工具在病理图像中的适用性尚未得到探讨,特别是像COVID-19这样的传染病。本研究探讨了不同严重程度和传染病类型的cxr图像质量质量的欧洲指南的效用。方法:采用方便的抽样方法,招募25名参与者(合格的放射技师:n = 13,四年级放射学本科生:n = 12),使用欧洲CXR图像质量指南评估70张CXR图像。图像数据集由COVID-19和非COVID-19病例组成,随机选择以反映常规临床实践的可变性。参与者根据欧洲cxr质量标准指南中的10个标准独立评定图像质量,使用6分李克特量表。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较正常和病理CXR图像的图像质量评分。斯皮尔曼的排序顺序相关被用来评估质量标准评级之间的关联。结果:无病理或非COVID-19病理的cxr的总QA评分高于有COVID-19和不确定COVID-19的cxr (P)。结论:病理严重会对具有COVID-19特征的cxr的技术质量产生负面影响,但不一定影响其诊断价值。研究结果强调,在评估表现弥漫性病理征象的cxr时,需要优先考虑诊断能力而不是技术质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信