Early Identification of Myocardial Microstructural Alterations in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with in Vivo Cardiac Diffusion-Tensor Imaging.

IF 3.8 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zhixiang Dong, Yun Tang, Peng Sun, Gang Yin, Kankan Zhao, Xuan Ma, Shujuan Yang, Jiaxin Wang, Xiaorui Xiang, Kai Yang, Minjie Lu, Xiuyu Chen, Yanjie Zhu, Shihua Zhao
{"title":"Early Identification of Myocardial Microstructural Alterations in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with in Vivo Cardiac Diffusion-Tensor Imaging.","authors":"Zhixiang Dong, Yun Tang, Peng Sun, Gang Yin, Kankan Zhao, Xuan Ma, Shujuan Yang, Jiaxin Wang, Xiaorui Xiang, Kai Yang, Minjie Lu, Xiuyu Chen, Yanjie Zhu, Shihua Zhao","doi":"10.1148/ryct.240009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To explore the diffusion characteristics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) using in vivo cardiac diffusion-tensor imaging (cDTI) and to determine whether cDTI could help identify abnormal myocardium beyond cardiac MRI findings of fibrosis and hypertrophy. Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted from April to August 2023, participants with HCM and healthy volunteers were enrolled for cardiac MRI evaluation, including cine, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T1 mapping, and cDT imaging, using a 3.0-T scanner. LGE was performed only in participants with HCM. All cardiac MR images of the midventricular section were divided into six American Heart Association segments for segmental analysis. Repeated measure analysis of variance and Friedman test were used to compare cDTI parameters among different segments, and a linear mixed-effects model was fitted to account for within-participant clustering. Diagnostic performance of cDTI parameters in discriminating HCM segments from normal segments was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Thirty-five participants with HCM (mean age, 46 years ± 13 [SD]; 19 [54%] male) and 15 healthy volunteers (mean age, 43 years ± 17; nine [60%] male) were included. Compared with controls, the HCM group showed significantly reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) (mean, 0.33 ± 0.05 vs 0.46 ± 0.04; <i>P</i> < .001) and increased diastolic second eigenvector angle (E2A) (mean, 48.85° ± 7.13 vs 35.05° ± 5.06; <i>P</i> < .001). In segmental analysis, FA and diastolic E2A of HCM segments with no hypertrophy or LGE also significantly differed from controls (estimated marginal mean, FA: 0.39 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.41] vs 0.45 [95% CI: 0.43, 0.47]; E2A: 46.03° [95% CI: 43.45, 48.62] vs 35.69° [95% CI: 31.69, 39.69]; both <i>P</i> < .001), with no evidence of a difference in native T1 values (estimated marginal mean, 1282.43 msec [95% CI: 1267.55, 1297.30] vs 1265.57 msec [95% CI: 1242.86, 1288.28]; <i>P</i> = .47). FA (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.81 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.86]) and diastolic E2A (AUC, 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.84]) showed higher performance than native T1 (AUC, 0.67 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.72]) in identifying HCM segments from normal segments (<i>P</i> < .001 and <i>P</i> = .007, respectively). Conclusion Myocardial disarray and abnormal microstructural dynamics of HCM can be identified by using in vivo cDTI even in the absence of hypertrophy or fibrosis, suggesting the potential value of cDTI in tissue characterization of HCM. <b>Keywords:</b> Cardiovascular MR Imaging, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Diffusion-Tensor Imaging, Myocardial Microstructure <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"7 1","pages":"e240009"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.240009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To explore the diffusion characteristics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) using in vivo cardiac diffusion-tensor imaging (cDTI) and to determine whether cDTI could help identify abnormal myocardium beyond cardiac MRI findings of fibrosis and hypertrophy. Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted from April to August 2023, participants with HCM and healthy volunteers were enrolled for cardiac MRI evaluation, including cine, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T1 mapping, and cDT imaging, using a 3.0-T scanner. LGE was performed only in participants with HCM. All cardiac MR images of the midventricular section were divided into six American Heart Association segments for segmental analysis. Repeated measure analysis of variance and Friedman test were used to compare cDTI parameters among different segments, and a linear mixed-effects model was fitted to account for within-participant clustering. Diagnostic performance of cDTI parameters in discriminating HCM segments from normal segments was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Thirty-five participants with HCM (mean age, 46 years ± 13 [SD]; 19 [54%] male) and 15 healthy volunteers (mean age, 43 years ± 17; nine [60%] male) were included. Compared with controls, the HCM group showed significantly reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) (mean, 0.33 ± 0.05 vs 0.46 ± 0.04; P < .001) and increased diastolic second eigenvector angle (E2A) (mean, 48.85° ± 7.13 vs 35.05° ± 5.06; P < .001). In segmental analysis, FA and diastolic E2A of HCM segments with no hypertrophy or LGE also significantly differed from controls (estimated marginal mean, FA: 0.39 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.41] vs 0.45 [95% CI: 0.43, 0.47]; E2A: 46.03° [95% CI: 43.45, 48.62] vs 35.69° [95% CI: 31.69, 39.69]; both P < .001), with no evidence of a difference in native T1 values (estimated marginal mean, 1282.43 msec [95% CI: 1267.55, 1297.30] vs 1265.57 msec [95% CI: 1242.86, 1288.28]; P = .47). FA (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.81 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.86]) and diastolic E2A (AUC, 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.84]) showed higher performance than native T1 (AUC, 0.67 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.72]) in identifying HCM segments from normal segments (P < .001 and P = .007, respectively). Conclusion Myocardial disarray and abnormal microstructural dynamics of HCM can be identified by using in vivo cDTI even in the absence of hypertrophy or fibrosis, suggesting the potential value of cDTI in tissue characterization of HCM. Keywords: Cardiovascular MR Imaging, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Diffusion-Tensor Imaging, Myocardial Microstructure Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

体内弥散张量成像早期识别肥厚性心肌病心肌微结构改变。
目的探讨肥厚性心肌病(HCM)的体内弥散张量成像(cDTI)的弥散特征,探讨cDTI在心肌纤维化和肥厚的MRI表现之外是否有助于识别异常心肌。材料与方法本前瞻性研究于2023年4月至8月进行,纳入HCM参与者和健康志愿者,使用3.0 t扫描仪进行心脏MRI评估,包括电影,晚期钆增强(LGE), T1定位和cDT成像。LGE仅在HCM患者中进行。所有心脏中心室的MR图像被分成6个美国心脏协会节段进行节段分析。使用重复测量方差分析和Friedman检验比较不同区段间的cDTI参数,并拟合线性混合效应模型来解释参与者内聚类。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估cDTI参数在区分HCM节段和正常节段中的诊断性能。结果35例HCM患者(平均年龄46岁±13岁[SD];男性19例(54%),健康志愿者15例(平均年龄43岁±17岁;包括9例(60%)男性。与对照组相比,HCM组显著降低了分数各向异性(FA)(平均0.33±0.05 vs 0.46±0.04;P < 0.001)和舒张期第二特征向量角(E2A)增加(平均48.85°±7.13 vs 35.05°±5.06;P < 0.001)。在节段分析中,无肥厚或LGE的HCM节段的FA和舒张E2A也与对照组显著不同(估计边际平均值,FA: 0.39 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.41] vs 0.45 [95% CI: 0.43, 0.47];E2A: 46.03°[95% CI: 43.45, 48.62] vs 35.69°[95% CI: 31.69, 39.69];P均< 0.001),没有证据表明原生T1值存在差异(估计的边际平均值为1282.43 msec [95% CI: 1267.55, 1297.30] vs 1265.57 msec [95% CI: 1242.86, 128.28];P = .47)。FA (ROC曲线下面积[AUC], 0.81 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.86])和舒张期E2A (AUC, 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.84])在识别HCM节段和正常节段方面表现优于原生T1 (AUC, 0.67 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.72])(分别P < 0.001和P = 0.007)。结论体内cDTI可识别HCM心肌紊乱和异常微结构动力学,提示cDTI在HCM组织表征中的潜在价值。关键词:心血管磁共振成像,肥厚性心肌病,弥散张量成像,心肌微结构在CC BY 4.0许可下发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信