{"title":"Forecasting Pediatric Trauma Volumes: Insights From a Retrospective Study Using Machine Learning","authors":"Ayaka Tsutsumi MD , Chiara Camerota PhD , Flavio Esposito PhD , Si-Min Park MD , Tiffany Taylor MSN, MBA, RN , Shin Miyata MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Rising pediatric firearm-related fatalities in the United States strain Trauma Centers. Predicting trauma volume could improve resource management and preparedness, particularly if daily forecasts are achievable. The aim of the study is to evaluate various machine learning models’ accuracy on monthly, weekly, and daily data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The retrospective study utilized trauma data between June 1, 2013, and October 31, 2023, from a level I/II pediatric trauma center. Data were organized monthly, weekly, and daily, which further delineated into seven groups, yielding 21 cohorts. Models were evaluated using time-series forecasting metrics. In addition, the models were tested for real-world applicability by forecasting trauma volumes 3 mo, 12 wk, and 31 d ahead for monthly, weekly, and daily predictions respectively. The predicted values were then compared with the actual data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total of 12,144 patients’ data was utilized to create and evaluate models. 14 forecasting models for each of 21 groups were developed. Monthly predictions generally outperformed weekly and daily ones. Although the Silverkite model excelled in monthly predictions, the one-dimensional convolutional layer model was most accurate for daily predictions. Real-life simulations showed the Prophet model performing best for monthly predictions, with no clear winner for weekly predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study found monthly forecasting most accurate. Although many models outperformed their Naïve counterparts, performance varied by grouping. Real-world simulations confirmed these findings. Despite high accuracy in monthly predictions, the study's generalizability is limited, and daily trauma prediction needs improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"Pages 33-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424008047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Rising pediatric firearm-related fatalities in the United States strain Trauma Centers. Predicting trauma volume could improve resource management and preparedness, particularly if daily forecasts are achievable. The aim of the study is to evaluate various machine learning models’ accuracy on monthly, weekly, and daily data.
Methods
The retrospective study utilized trauma data between June 1, 2013, and October 31, 2023, from a level I/II pediatric trauma center. Data were organized monthly, weekly, and daily, which further delineated into seven groups, yielding 21 cohorts. Models were evaluated using time-series forecasting metrics. In addition, the models were tested for real-world applicability by forecasting trauma volumes 3 mo, 12 wk, and 31 d ahead for monthly, weekly, and daily predictions respectively. The predicted values were then compared with the actual data.
Results
The total of 12,144 patients’ data was utilized to create and evaluate models. 14 forecasting models for each of 21 groups were developed. Monthly predictions generally outperformed weekly and daily ones. Although the Silverkite model excelled in monthly predictions, the one-dimensional convolutional layer model was most accurate for daily predictions. Real-life simulations showed the Prophet model performing best for monthly predictions, with no clear winner for weekly predictions.
Conclusions
This study found monthly forecasting most accurate. Although many models outperformed their Naïve counterparts, performance varied by grouping. Real-world simulations confirmed these findings. Despite high accuracy in monthly predictions, the study's generalizability is limited, and daily trauma prediction needs improvement.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.