The effect of pipette- and laser-induced blastocyst collapse before vitrification on their re-expansion and clinical outcome after warming.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Iris Martínez-Rodero, Borut Kovačič, Omar Shebl, Sabine Enengl, Julia Lastinger, Thomas Ebner
{"title":"The effect of pipette- and laser-induced blastocyst collapse before vitrification on their re-expansion and clinical outcome after warming.","authors":"Iris Martínez-Rodero, Borut Kovačič, Omar Shebl, Sabine Enengl, Julia Lastinger, Thomas Ebner","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Research question: </strong>What are the effects of pipette- versus laser-assisted artificial blastocyst collapse (ABC) on the morphokinetics of warmed blastocyst re-expansion, and what is the potential effect on treatment outcomes?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Surplus blastocysts were extracted from 203 patients. These were divided into three groups: study group A, artificial collapsed by the aspiration of blastocoel fluid with a pipette; study group B, trophectoderm opened with a laser pulse; control group, no manipulation before vitrification was performed. During the 5-year study period, 257 associated single-warm blastocyst transfers were scheduled. The start and duration of the re-expansion process before transfer were annotated. Pregnancy and live birth data were also collected for the transfers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall blastocyst survival rate was 96.9%, with no effect observed as a result of the two ABC methods. The re-expansion of blastocysts in study group B was initiated significantly sooner after warming (0.50 ± 0.37 h) than in group A (0.79 ± 0.56 h) or the control group (1.22 ± 1.00 h). The duration of the re-expansion process was significantly reduced in study groups A (P = 0.021) and B (P = 0.004) compared with the control group. The embryos of participants who achieved a live birth had a significantly (P < 0.001) faster start of re-expansion (0.60 ± 0.42 h) than the embryos in those who did not produce an ongoing pregnancy (1.05 ± 0.92 h).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser-treated blastocysts exhibited substantially shorter re-expansion times. Because faster re-expansion of the blastocyst is associated with positive treatment outcomes, the laser technique should be prioritized over the pipetting technique if ABC is considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"50 2","pages":"104476"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research question: What are the effects of pipette- versus laser-assisted artificial blastocyst collapse (ABC) on the morphokinetics of warmed blastocyst re-expansion, and what is the potential effect on treatment outcomes?

Design: Surplus blastocysts were extracted from 203 patients. These were divided into three groups: study group A, artificial collapsed by the aspiration of blastocoel fluid with a pipette; study group B, trophectoderm opened with a laser pulse; control group, no manipulation before vitrification was performed. During the 5-year study period, 257 associated single-warm blastocyst transfers were scheduled. The start and duration of the re-expansion process before transfer were annotated. Pregnancy and live birth data were also collected for the transfers.

Results: The overall blastocyst survival rate was 96.9%, with no effect observed as a result of the two ABC methods. The re-expansion of blastocysts in study group B was initiated significantly sooner after warming (0.50 ± 0.37 h) than in group A (0.79 ± 0.56 h) or the control group (1.22 ± 1.00 h). The duration of the re-expansion process was significantly reduced in study groups A (P = 0.021) and B (P = 0.004) compared with the control group. The embryos of participants who achieved a live birth had a significantly (P < 0.001) faster start of re-expansion (0.60 ± 0.42 h) than the embryos in those who did not produce an ongoing pregnancy (1.05 ± 0.92 h).

Conclusions: Laser-treated blastocysts exhibited substantially shorter re-expansion times. Because faster re-expansion of the blastocyst is associated with positive treatment outcomes, the laser technique should be prioritized over the pipetting technique if ABC is considered.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信