De-Escalation of Nodal Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Neslihan Cabioglu, Havva Belma Koçer, Hasan Karanlik, Mehmet Ali Gülçelik, Abdullah Igci, Mahmut Müslümanoglu, Cihan Uras, Baris Mantoglu, Didem Can Trabulus, Giray Akgül, Mustafa Tükenmez, Kazim Senol, Enver Özkurt, Ebru Sen, Güldeniz Karadeniz Çakmak, Süleyman Bademler, Selman Emiroglu, Nilüfer Yildirim, Halil Kara, Ahmet Dag, Ece Dilege, Ayse Altinok, Gül Basaran, Ecenur Varol, Ümit Ugurlu, Yasemin Bölükbasi, Yeliz Emine Ersoy, Baha Zengel, Niyazi Karaman, Serdar Özbas, Leyla Zer, Halime Gül Kiliç, Orhan Agcaoglu, Gürhan Sakman, Zafer Utkan, Aykut Soyder, Alper Akcan, Sefa Ergün, Ravza Yilmaz, Adnan Aydiner, Atilla Soran, Kamuran Ibis, Vahit Özmen
{"title":"De-Escalation of Nodal Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer.","authors":"Neslihan Cabioglu, Havva Belma Koçer, Hasan Karanlik, Mehmet Ali Gülçelik, Abdullah Igci, Mahmut Müslümanoglu, Cihan Uras, Baris Mantoglu, Didem Can Trabulus, Giray Akgül, Mustafa Tükenmez, Kazim Senol, Enver Özkurt, Ebru Sen, Güldeniz Karadeniz Çakmak, Süleyman Bademler, Selman Emiroglu, Nilüfer Yildirim, Halil Kara, Ahmet Dag, Ece Dilege, Ayse Altinok, Gül Basaran, Ecenur Varol, Ümit Ugurlu, Yasemin Bölükbasi, Yeliz Emine Ersoy, Baha Zengel, Niyazi Karaman, Serdar Özbas, Leyla Zer, Halime Gül Kiliç, Orhan Agcaoglu, Gürhan Sakman, Zafer Utkan, Aykut Soyder, Alper Akcan, Sefa Ergün, Ravza Yilmaz, Adnan Aydiner, Atilla Soran, Kamuran Ibis, Vahit Özmen","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Increasing evidence supports the oncologic safety of de-escalating axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of de-escalating axillary surgery among patients with clinically node (cN)-positive breast cancer and patients whose disease became cN negative after NAC (ycN negative).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In the NEOSENTITURK MF-1803 prospective cohort registry trial, patients from 37 centers with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) alone or with ypN-negative or ypN-positive disease after NAC were recruited between February 15, 2019, and January 1, 2023, and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Treatment with SLNB or TAD after NAC.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary aim of the study was axillary, locoregional, or distant recurrence rates; disease-free survival; and disease-specific survival. Number of axillary lymph nodes removed was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 976 patients (median age, 46 years [range, 21-80 years]) with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease underwent SLNB (n = 620) or TAD alone (n = 356). Most of the cohort had a mapping procedure with blue dye alone (645 [66.1%]) with (n = 177) or without (n = 468) TAD. Overall, no difference was found between patients treated with TAD and patients treated with SLNB in the median number of total lymph nodes removed (TAD, 4 [3-6] vs SLNB, 4 [3-6]; P = .09). Among patients with ypN-positive disease, those who underwent TAD were more likely to have a lower median lymph node ratio (TAD, 0.28 [IQR, 0.20-0.40] vs SLNB, 0.33 [IQR, 0.20-0.50]; P = .03). At a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR, 29-48 months), no significant difference was found in the rates of ipsilateral axillary recurrence (0.3% [1 of 356] vs 0.3% [2 of 620]; P ≥ .99) or locoregional recurrence (0.6% [2 of 356] vs 1.1% [7 of 620]; P = .50) between the TAD and SLNB groups, with an overall locoregional recurrence rate of 0.9% (9 of 976). The initial clinical tumor stage, pathologic complete response, and use of blue dye alone as a mapping procedure were not associated with the outcome. Even though patients with TAD demonstrated an increased disease-free survival rate compared with the SLNB group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (94.9% vs 92.6%; P = .07). Factors associated with decreased 5-year disease-specific survival were cN2-3 axillary stage (cN1, 98.7% vs cN2-3, 96.8%; P = .03) and nonluminal type tumor pathologic characteristics (luminal, 98.9% vs nonluminal, 96.9%; P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The short-term results suggest very low rates of axillary and locoregional recurrence in a select group of patients with cN-negative disease after NAC treated with TAD alone or SLNB alone followed by regional nodal irradiation regardless of the SLNB technique or nodal pathology. Whether TAD might provide a clear survival advantage compared with SLNB remains to be proven in studies with longer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":"257-266"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Increasing evidence supports the oncologic safety of de-escalating axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Objective: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of de-escalating axillary surgery among patients with clinically node (cN)-positive breast cancer and patients whose disease became cN negative after NAC (ycN negative).

Design, setting, and participants: In the NEOSENTITURK MF-1803 prospective cohort registry trial, patients from 37 centers with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) alone or with ypN-negative or ypN-positive disease after NAC were recruited between February 15, 2019, and January 1, 2023, and evaluated.

Exposure: Treatment with SLNB or TAD after NAC.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary aim of the study was axillary, locoregional, or distant recurrence rates; disease-free survival; and disease-specific survival. Number of axillary lymph nodes removed was also evaluated.

Results: A total of 976 patients (median age, 46 years [range, 21-80 years]) with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease underwent SLNB (n = 620) or TAD alone (n = 356). Most of the cohort had a mapping procedure with blue dye alone (645 [66.1%]) with (n = 177) or without (n = 468) TAD. Overall, no difference was found between patients treated with TAD and patients treated with SLNB in the median number of total lymph nodes removed (TAD, 4 [3-6] vs SLNB, 4 [3-6]; P = .09). Among patients with ypN-positive disease, those who underwent TAD were more likely to have a lower median lymph node ratio (TAD, 0.28 [IQR, 0.20-0.40] vs SLNB, 0.33 [IQR, 0.20-0.50]; P = .03). At a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR, 29-48 months), no significant difference was found in the rates of ipsilateral axillary recurrence (0.3% [1 of 356] vs 0.3% [2 of 620]; P ≥ .99) or locoregional recurrence (0.6% [2 of 356] vs 1.1% [7 of 620]; P = .50) between the TAD and SLNB groups, with an overall locoregional recurrence rate of 0.9% (9 of 976). The initial clinical tumor stage, pathologic complete response, and use of blue dye alone as a mapping procedure were not associated with the outcome. Even though patients with TAD demonstrated an increased disease-free survival rate compared with the SLNB group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (94.9% vs 92.6%; P = .07). Factors associated with decreased 5-year disease-specific survival were cN2-3 axillary stage (cN1, 98.7% vs cN2-3, 96.8%; P = .03) and nonluminal type tumor pathologic characteristics (luminal, 98.9% vs nonluminal, 96.9%; P = .007).

Conclusions and relevance: The short-term results suggest very low rates of axillary and locoregional recurrence in a select group of patients with cN-negative disease after NAC treated with TAD alone or SLNB alone followed by regional nodal irradiation regardless of the SLNB technique or nodal pathology. Whether TAD might provide a clear survival advantage compared with SLNB remains to be proven in studies with longer follow-up.

临床淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的淋巴结手术降级。
重要性:越来越多的证据支持乳腺癌患者在新辅助化疗(NAC)后进行降级腋窝手术的肿瘤学安全性。目的:评价临床淋巴结(cN)阳性乳腺癌患者和NAC (ycN阴性)后变为cN阴性的患者行腋窝降压手术的肿瘤预后。设计、环境和参与者:在NEOSENTITURK MF-1803前瞻性队列注册试验中,在2019年2月15日至2023年1月1日期间招募了来自37个中心的cT1-4N1-3M0疾病患者,这些患者单独接受前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)或靶向腋窝清扫(TAD)治疗,或患有NAC后的ypn阴性或ypn阳性疾病,并进行了评估。暴露:NAC后用SLNB或TAD治疗。主要结果和测量:研究的主要目的是腋窝、局部或远处的复发率;无病生存;以及疾病特异性生存。同时评估腋窝淋巴结切除的数量。结果:共有976例cT1-4N1-3M0患者(中位年龄46岁[范围21-80岁])行SLNB (n = 620)或单独行TAD (n = 356)。大多数队列进行了单独使用蓝色染料(645例[66.1%])(n = 177)或不使用TAD (n = 468)的制图程序。总体而言,接受TAD治疗的患者和接受SLNB治疗的患者在总淋巴结切除的中位数上没有差异(TAD, 4 [3-6] vs SLNB, 4 [3-6];p = .09)。在ypn阳性疾病患者中,接受TAD的患者更可能有较低的中位淋巴结比(TAD, 0.28 [IQR, 0.20-0.40] vs SLNB, 0.33 [IQR, 0.20-0.50];p = .03)。中位随访39个月(IQR, 29-48个月),发现同侧腋窝复发率无显著差异(0.3%[356例中1例]vs 0.3%[620例中2例];P≥0.99)或局部复发(0.6%[356例中2例]vs 1.1%[620例中7例];P = 0.50),总局部复发率为0.9%(976例中9例)。最初的临床肿瘤分期,病理完全缓解,以及单独使用蓝色染料作为绘图程序与结果无关。尽管与SLNB组相比,TAD患者的无病生存率增加,但这种差异没有达到统计学意义(94.9% vs 92.6%;p = .07)。与5年疾病特异性生存率降低相关的因素为:cN2-3腋窝期(cN1, 98.7% vs cN2-3, 96.8%;P = .03)和非腔型肿瘤病理特征(腔型,98.9% vs非腔型,96.9%;p = .007)。结论和相关性:短期结果表明,无论SLNB技术或淋巴结病理如何,在一组选择的cn阴性疾病患者中,单独使用TAD或单独使用SLNB治疗NAC后,局部淋巴结照射的腋窝和局部复发率非常低。与SLNB相比,TAD是否具有明显的生存优势还有待于更长的随访研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信