Outcomes and Impact of Device Iterations in Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: The REPAIR Study.

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Philipp von Stein, Lukas Stolz, Jean Marc Haurand, Matthias Gröger, Felix Rudolph, Donika Mustafa, Jannik Jobst, Christoph Alexander Mues, Amir Abbas Mahabadi, Isabel A Hörbrand, Carl Schulz, Atsushi Sugiura, Tobias Ruf, Philipp Lurz, Muhammed Gerçek, Patrick Horn, Mirjam Kessler, Tienush Rassaf, Marcel Weber, Tobias Kister, Niklas Schofer, Mathias Konstandin, Florian Schindhelm, Helge Möllmann, Bernhard Unsöld, Stephan Baldus, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Volker Rudolph, Jörg Hausleiter, Roman Pfister, Victor Mauri
{"title":"Outcomes and Impact of Device Iterations in Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: The REPAIR Study.","authors":"Philipp von Stein, Lukas Stolz, Jean Marc Haurand, Matthias Gröger, Felix Rudolph, Donika Mustafa, Jannik Jobst, Christoph Alexander Mues, Amir Abbas Mahabadi, Isabel A Hörbrand, Carl Schulz, Atsushi Sugiura, Tobias Ruf, Philipp Lurz, Muhammed Gerçek, Patrick Horn, Mirjam Kessler, Tienush Rassaf, Marcel Weber, Tobias Kister, Niklas Schofer, Mathias Konstandin, Florian Schindhelm, Helge Möllmann, Bernhard Unsöld, Stephan Baldus, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Volker Rudolph, Jörg Hausleiter, Roman Pfister, Victor Mauri","doi":"10.1016/j.jcin.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The PASCAL P10 system for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has undergone iterations, including introduction of the narrower Ace implant and the Precision delivery system.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study sought to evaluate outcomes and the impact of PASCAL mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair device iterations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The REPAIR (REgistry of PAscal for mltral Regurgitation) study is an investigator-initiated, multicenter registry including consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) treated from 2019 to 2024. Patients were stratified by device iteration: P10<sub>only</sub>, P10/Ace<sub>Gen1</sub> (introduction of Ace), and P10/Ace<sub>Prec</sub> (introduction of Precision). The primary endpoint was MR ≤1+ at discharge; secondary endpoints included technical success and MR durability (discharge vs 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,165 patients (mean age 78 ± 10 years, 44% female, 85% in NYHA functional class ≥III, EuroSCORE II [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II] 4.9% [Q1-Q3: 3.0% to 8.1%]) were included: 660 P10<sub>only</sub>, 945 P10/Ace<sub>Gen1</sub>, and 560 P10/Ace<sub>Prec</sub>. Median follow-up was 510 days (Q1-Q3: 369-874 days). Primary (47% [n = 1,019 of 2,142]) and secondary (52% [n = 1,123 of 2,142]) MR etiology did not change across device iterations (P = 0.547). Technical success was achieved in 97.0% (n = 2,099 of 2,165) with similar rates across device iterations (P = 0.290). MR ≤1+ was achieved in 72% (n = 1,397 of 2,085), improving with device iterations (P10<sub>only</sub>: 66% [n = 422 of 638], P10/Ace<sub>Gen1</sub>: 73% [n = 661 of 906], P10/Ace<sub>Prec</sub>: 77% [n = 414 of 541]; P < 0.001). MR grades of ≤1+ and ≤2+ slightly worsened at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, primarily in patients with primary MR, with no differences across iterations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Device iterations of the PASCAL system resulted in increasing rates of achieving MR reduction to ≤1+ at discharge, with stable and high technical success rates. A slight deterioration of the initial result warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14688,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.11.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The PASCAL P10 system for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has undergone iterations, including introduction of the narrower Ace implant and the Precision delivery system.

Objectives: The study sought to evaluate outcomes and the impact of PASCAL mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair device iterations.

Methods: The REPAIR (REgistry of PAscal for mltral Regurgitation) study is an investigator-initiated, multicenter registry including consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) treated from 2019 to 2024. Patients were stratified by device iteration: P10only, P10/AceGen1 (introduction of Ace), and P10/AcePrec (introduction of Precision). The primary endpoint was MR ≤1+ at discharge; secondary endpoints included technical success and MR durability (discharge vs 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years).

Results: A total of 2,165 patients (mean age 78 ± 10 years, 44% female, 85% in NYHA functional class ≥III, EuroSCORE II [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II] 4.9% [Q1-Q3: 3.0% to 8.1%]) were included: 660 P10only, 945 P10/AceGen1, and 560 P10/AcePrec. Median follow-up was 510 days (Q1-Q3: 369-874 days). Primary (47% [n = 1,019 of 2,142]) and secondary (52% [n = 1,123 of 2,142]) MR etiology did not change across device iterations (P = 0.547). Technical success was achieved in 97.0% (n = 2,099 of 2,165) with similar rates across device iterations (P = 0.290). MR ≤1+ was achieved in 72% (n = 1,397 of 2,085), improving with device iterations (P10only: 66% [n = 422 of 638], P10/AceGen1: 73% [n = 661 of 906], P10/AcePrec: 77% [n = 414 of 541]; P < 0.001). MR grades of ≤1+ and ≤2+ slightly worsened at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, primarily in patients with primary MR, with no differences across iterations.

Conclusions: Device iterations of the PASCAL system resulted in increasing rates of achieving MR reduction to ≤1+ at discharge, with stable and high technical success rates. A slight deterioration of the initial result warrants further investigation.

二尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修复中器械迭代的结果和影响:修复研究。
背景:用于二尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修复的PASCAL P10系统经历了多次迭代,包括引入更窄的Ace植入物和Precision递送系统。目的:本研究旨在评估PASCAL二尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修复装置迭代的结果和影响。方法:REPAIR研究是一项由研究者发起的多中心注册研究,包括2019年至2024年连续治疗二尖瓣反流(MR)的患者。通过设备迭代对患者进行分层:P10only、P10/AceGen1(引入Ace)和P10/AcePrec(引入Precision)。主要终点为出院时MR≤1+;次要终点包括技术成功和MR耐久性(出院vs 30天,1年和2年)。结果:共纳入2165例患者(平均年龄78±10岁,44%为女性,85%为NYHA功能分级≥III, EuroSCORE II[欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II] 4.9% [Q1-Q3: 3.0%至8.1%]):660例仅P10, 945例P10/AceGen1, 560例P10/AcePrec。中位随访时间为510天(Q1-Q3: 369-874天)。主要(47% [n = 1,019 / 2,142])和次要(52% [n = 1,123 / 2,142]) MR病因在设备迭代期间没有变化(P = 0.547)。技术成功率为97.0% (n = 2,165中的2,099),设备迭代的成功率相似(P = 0.290)。72% (n = 1,397 / 2085)的MR≤1+,随着设备的迭代而提高(P10: 66% [n = 422 / 638], P10/AceGen1: 73% [n = 661 / 906], P10/AcePrec: 77% [n = 414 / 541];P < 0.001)。≤1+和≤2+的MR分级在30天、1年和2年时略有恶化,主要发生在原发性MR患者中,各迭代间无差异。结论:PASCAL系统的设备迭代使放电时MR降低率提高到≤1+,技术成功率稳定且高。初步结果稍有恶化,值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.80%
发文量
756
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions is a specialist journal launched by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It covers the entire field of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including cardiac, peripheral, and cerebrovascular interventions. The journal publishes studies that will impact the practice of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including clinical trials, experimental studies, and in-depth discussions by respected experts. To enhance visual understanding, the journal is published both in print and electronically, utilizing the latest technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信