Philipp von Stein MD , Lukas Stolz MD , Jean Marc Haurand MD , Matthias Gröger MD , Felix Rudolph MD , Donika Mustafa , Jannik Jobst MD , Christoph Alexander Mues MD , Amir Abbas Mahabadi MD , Isabel A. Hörbrand MD , Carl Schulz MD , Atsushi Sugiura MD , Tobias Ruf MD , Philipp Lurz MD , Muhammed Gerçek MD , Patrick Horn MD , Mirjam Kessler MD , Tienush Rassaf MD , Marcel Weber MD , Tobias Kister MD , Victor Mauri MD
{"title":"Outcomes and Impact of Device Iterations in Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair","authors":"Philipp von Stein MD , Lukas Stolz MD , Jean Marc Haurand MD , Matthias Gröger MD , Felix Rudolph MD , Donika Mustafa , Jannik Jobst MD , Christoph Alexander Mues MD , Amir Abbas Mahabadi MD , Isabel A. Hörbrand MD , Carl Schulz MD , Atsushi Sugiura MD , Tobias Ruf MD , Philipp Lurz MD , Muhammed Gerçek MD , Patrick Horn MD , Mirjam Kessler MD , Tienush Rassaf MD , Marcel Weber MD , Tobias Kister MD , Victor Mauri MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcin.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The PASCAL P10 system for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has undergone iterations, including introduction of the narrower Ace implant and the Precision delivery system.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study sought to evaluate outcomes and the impact of PASCAL mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair device iterations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The REPAIR (REgistry of PAscal for mltral Regurgitation) study is an investigator-initiated, multicenter registry including consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) treated from 2019 to 2024. Patients were stratified by device iteration: P10<sub>only</sub>, P10/Ace<sub>Gen1</sub> (introduction of Ace), and P10/Ace<sub>Prec</sub> (introduction of Precision). The primary endpoint was MR ≤1+ at discharge; secondary endpoints included technical success and MR durability (discharge vs 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2,165 patients (mean age 78 ± 10 years, 44% female, 85% in NYHA functional class ≥III, EuroSCORE II [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II] 4.9% [Q1-Q3: 3.0% to 8.1%]) were included: 660 P10<sub>only</sub>, 945 P10/Ace<sub>Gen1</sub>, and 560 P10/Ace<sub>Prec</sub>. Median follow-up was 510 days (Q1-Q3: 369-874 days). Primary (47% [n = 1,019 of 2,142]) and secondary (52% [n = 1,123 of 2,142]) MR etiology did not change across device iterations (<em>P</em> = 0.547). Technical success was achieved in 97.0% (n = 2,099 of 2,165) with similar rates across device iterations (<em>P</em> = 0.290). MR ≤1+ was achieved in 72% (n = 1,397 of 2,085), improving with device iterations (P10<sub>only</sub>: 66% [n = 422 of 638], P10/Ace<sub>Gen1</sub>: 73% [n = 661 of 906], P10/Ace<sub>Prec</sub>: 77% [n = 414 of 541]; <em>P</em> < 0.001). MR grades of ≤1+ and ≤2+ slightly worsened at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, primarily in patients with primary MR, with no differences across iterations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Device iterations of the PASCAL system resulted in increasing rates of achieving MR reduction to ≤1+ at discharge, with stable and high technical success rates. A slight deterioration of the initial result warrants further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14688,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":"18 5","pages":"Pages 573-586"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879824017126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The PASCAL P10 system for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has undergone iterations, including introduction of the narrower Ace implant and the Precision delivery system.
Objectives
This study sought to evaluate outcomes and the impact of PASCAL mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair device iterations.
Methods
The REPAIR (REgistry of PAscal for mltral Regurgitation) study is an investigator-initiated, multicenter registry including consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) treated from 2019 to 2024. Patients were stratified by device iteration: P10only, P10/AceGen1 (introduction of Ace), and P10/AcePrec (introduction of Precision). The primary endpoint was MR ≤1+ at discharge; secondary endpoints included technical success and MR durability (discharge vs 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years).
Results
A total of 2,165 patients (mean age 78 ± 10 years, 44% female, 85% in NYHA functional class ≥III, EuroSCORE II [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II] 4.9% [Q1-Q3: 3.0% to 8.1%]) were included: 660 P10only, 945 P10/AceGen1, and 560 P10/AcePrec. Median follow-up was 510 days (Q1-Q3: 369-874 days). Primary (47% [n = 1,019 of 2,142]) and secondary (52% [n = 1,123 of 2,142]) MR etiology did not change across device iterations (P = 0.547). Technical success was achieved in 97.0% (n = 2,099 of 2,165) with similar rates across device iterations (P = 0.290). MR ≤1+ was achieved in 72% (n = 1,397 of 2,085), improving with device iterations (P10only: 66% [n = 422 of 638], P10/AceGen1: 73% [n = 661 of 906], P10/AcePrec: 77% [n = 414 of 541]; P < 0.001). MR grades of ≤1+ and ≤2+ slightly worsened at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, primarily in patients with primary MR, with no differences across iterations.
Conclusions
Device iterations of the PASCAL system resulted in increasing rates of achieving MR reduction to ≤1+ at discharge, with stable and high technical success rates. A slight deterioration of the initial result warrants further investigation.
期刊介绍:
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions is a specialist journal launched by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It covers the entire field of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including cardiac, peripheral, and cerebrovascular interventions. The journal publishes studies that will impact the practice of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including clinical trials, experimental studies, and in-depth discussions by respected experts. To enhance visual understanding, the journal is published both in print and electronically, utilizing the latest technologies.