Evaluation of intestinal biopsy tissue preservation methods to facilitate large-scale mucosal microbiota research.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Nicola J Wyatt, Hannah Watson, Gregory R Young, Mary Doona, Ned Tilling, Dean Allerton, Andrea C Masi, Tariq Ahmad, Jennifer A Doyle, Katherine Frith, Ailsa Hart, Victoria Hildreth, Peter M Irving, Claire Jones, Nicholas A Kennedy, Sarah Lawrence, Charlie W Lees, Robert Lees, Trevor Liddle, James O Lindsay, Julian R Marchesi, Miles Parkes, Nick Powell, Natalie J Prescott, Tim Raine, Jack Satsangi, Kevin Whelan, Ruth Wood, Andrew King, Luke Jostins-Dean, R Alexander Speight, Naomi McGregor, Christopher J Stewart, Christopher A Lamb
{"title":"Evaluation of intestinal biopsy tissue preservation methods to facilitate large-scale mucosal microbiota research.","authors":"Nicola J Wyatt, Hannah Watson, Gregory R Young, Mary Doona, Ned Tilling, Dean Allerton, Andrea C Masi, Tariq Ahmad, Jennifer A Doyle, Katherine Frith, Ailsa Hart, Victoria Hildreth, Peter M Irving, Claire Jones, Nicholas A Kennedy, Sarah Lawrence, Charlie W Lees, Robert Lees, Trevor Liddle, James O Lindsay, Julian R Marchesi, Miles Parkes, Nick Powell, Natalie J Prescott, Tim Raine, Jack Satsangi, Kevin Whelan, Ruth Wood, Andrew King, Luke Jostins-Dean, R Alexander Speight, Naomi McGregor, Christopher J Stewart, Christopher A Lamb","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large-scale multicentre studies are needed to understand complex relationships between the gut microbiota, health and disease. Interrogating the mucosal microbiota may identify important biology not captured by stool analysis. Gold standard tissue cryopreservation ('flash freezing') limits large-scale study feasibility. We aimed to compare gut microbiota in gold standard and pragmatic mucosal biopsy storage conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected endoscopic recto-sigmoid biopsies from 20 adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Biopsies were preserved using three methods: (i) flash freezing (most proximal and distal biopsy sites); (ii) nucleic acid preservative reagents (QIAGEN Allprotect®, Invitrogen RNAlater™, and Zymo DNA/RNA Shield™); and (iii) formalin fixation with paraffin embedding (FFPE), which is used to preserve tissue for clinical histopathology within healthcare settings. Microbiota were sequenced on the MiSeq platform (V4 region, 16S rRNA gene).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Tissue microbiota were consistent between most proximal and distal tissue suggesting any within-patient variation observed reflected storage condition, not biopsy location. There was no significant difference in alpha-diversity or microbial community profiles of reagent-preserved versus gold standard tissue. FFPE community structure was significantly dissimilar to other tissue samples, driven by differential relative abundance of obligate gut anaerobes; Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes and Lachnospiraceae. Despite these differences, tissue microbiota grouped by participant regardless of preservation and storage conditions.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Preservative reagents offer a convenient alternative to flash freezing tissue in prospective large-scale mucosal microbiota studies. Whilst less comparable, FFPE provides potential for retrospective microbiota studies using historical samples.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Medical Research Council (MR/T032162/1) and The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (G-2002-04255).</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"112 ","pages":"105550"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105550","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large-scale multicentre studies are needed to understand complex relationships between the gut microbiota, health and disease. Interrogating the mucosal microbiota may identify important biology not captured by stool analysis. Gold standard tissue cryopreservation ('flash freezing') limits large-scale study feasibility. We aimed to compare gut microbiota in gold standard and pragmatic mucosal biopsy storage conditions.

Methods: We collected endoscopic recto-sigmoid biopsies from 20 adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Biopsies were preserved using three methods: (i) flash freezing (most proximal and distal biopsy sites); (ii) nucleic acid preservative reagents (QIAGEN Allprotect®, Invitrogen RNAlater™, and Zymo DNA/RNA Shield™); and (iii) formalin fixation with paraffin embedding (FFPE), which is used to preserve tissue for clinical histopathology within healthcare settings. Microbiota were sequenced on the MiSeq platform (V4 region, 16S rRNA gene).

Findings: Tissue microbiota were consistent between most proximal and distal tissue suggesting any within-patient variation observed reflected storage condition, not biopsy location. There was no significant difference in alpha-diversity or microbial community profiles of reagent-preserved versus gold standard tissue. FFPE community structure was significantly dissimilar to other tissue samples, driven by differential relative abundance of obligate gut anaerobes; Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes and Lachnospiraceae. Despite these differences, tissue microbiota grouped by participant regardless of preservation and storage conditions.

Interpretation: Preservative reagents offer a convenient alternative to flash freezing tissue in prospective large-scale mucosal microbiota studies. Whilst less comparable, FFPE provides potential for retrospective microbiota studies using historical samples.

Funding: Medical Research Council (MR/T032162/1) and The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (G-2002-04255).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信