Improving the image quality of short-time bone SPECT using cadmium-zinc-telluride detectors with SwiftScan.

Q3 Medicine
Kazuto Funakoshi, Tomohiko Yamane, Eito Kozawa, Ichiro Matsunari
{"title":"Improving the image quality of short-time bone SPECT using cadmium-zinc-telluride detectors with SwiftScan.","authors":"Kazuto Funakoshi, Tomohiko Yamane, Eito Kozawa, Ichiro Matsunari","doi":"10.22038/aojnmb.2024.76919.1543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the quality and associated quantitative values of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with and without SwiftScan using a semiconductor camera equipped with a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer who underwent list-mode SPECT/computed tomography using a whole-body semiconductor camera participated in this study. A total of 130 metastatic lesions from 10 patients were analyzed. Standard SPECT images were obtained approximately 3 h later, and the images were constructed with and without SwiftScan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The visual assessment of 3-dimensional maximum intensity projection images showed that when an image quality score of 4 (good) or better was considered clinically acceptable, it was maintained at 4 or better in the 75% and 50% scans with SwiftScan, whereas only the 75% scan was considered acceptable without SwiftScan. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.952 at 5% for the standard time without SwiftScan and 0.990 with SwiftScan. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) changes were 0 to 9.5 (median 1.1) at 75%, 0.1 to 11.5 (1.65) at 50%, 0 to 15.7 (2.1) at 25%, 0.1 to 33.2 (4.2) at 10%, 0.2 to 8.9 (5.65) at 5% without SwiftScan. On the contrary, the SUV<sub>max</sub> changes in absolute value were 0 to 5.4 (median 0.8) at 75%, 0 to 6.5 (1.4) at 50%, 0 to 19.1 (1.7) at 25%, 0 to 24.2 (2.8) at 10%, 0 to 29.9 (2.6) at 5% with SwiftScan. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were 95.3 at 75%, 88.3 at 50%, 69.2 at 25%, 45.7 at 10%, and 31.6 at 5% without SwiftScan, and 96.9, 91.7, 78.0, 71.6, and 62.0, respectively, using SwiftScan.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the use of SwiftScan, a 50% reduction in acquisition time was considered acceptable for image quality with reproducible quantitative indices such as SUV<sub>max</sub> and CNR.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":"13 1","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2024.76919.1543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the quality and associated quantitative values of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with and without SwiftScan using a semiconductor camera equipped with a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector.

Methods: Ten patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer who underwent list-mode SPECT/computed tomography using a whole-body semiconductor camera participated in this study. A total of 130 metastatic lesions from 10 patients were analyzed. Standard SPECT images were obtained approximately 3 h later, and the images were constructed with and without SwiftScan.

Results: The visual assessment of 3-dimensional maximum intensity projection images showed that when an image quality score of 4 (good) or better was considered clinically acceptable, it was maintained at 4 or better in the 75% and 50% scans with SwiftScan, whereas only the 75% scan was considered acceptable without SwiftScan. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.952 at 5% for the standard time without SwiftScan and 0.990 with SwiftScan. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) changes were 0 to 9.5 (median 1.1) at 75%, 0.1 to 11.5 (1.65) at 50%, 0 to 15.7 (2.1) at 25%, 0.1 to 33.2 (4.2) at 10%, 0.2 to 8.9 (5.65) at 5% without SwiftScan. On the contrary, the SUVmax changes in absolute value were 0 to 5.4 (median 0.8) at 75%, 0 to 6.5 (1.4) at 50%, 0 to 19.1 (1.7) at 25%, 0 to 24.2 (2.8) at 10%, 0 to 29.9 (2.6) at 5% with SwiftScan. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were 95.3 at 75%, 88.3 at 50%, 69.2 at 25%, 45.7 at 10%, and 31.6 at 5% without SwiftScan, and 96.9, 91.7, 78.0, 71.6, and 62.0, respectively, using SwiftScan.

Conclusion: With the use of SwiftScan, a 50% reduction in acquisition time was considered acceptable for image quality with reproducible quantitative indices such as SUVmax and CNR.

使用SwiftScan碲化镉锌探测器提高短时间骨SPECT图像质量。
目的:本研究的目的是评估骨单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的质量和相关的定量值,使用半导体相机配备镉锌碲化探测器。方法:10例前列腺癌骨转移患者使用全身半导体相机进行列表模式SPECT/计算机断层扫描。我们分析了10例患者的130个转移灶。大约3小时后获得标准SPECT图像,并使用SwiftScan和不使用SwiftScan构建图像。结果:三维最大强度投影图像的视觉评估显示,当图像质量评分为4分(良好)或更高时,使用SwiftScan进行75%和50%扫描时,图像质量评分维持在4分或更高,而不使用SwiftScan时,只有75%扫描被认为是可接受的。在5%的标准时间内,未加SwiftScan的组内相关系数为0.952,加SwiftScan的组内相关系数为0.990。75%时最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)变化为0 ~ 9.5(中位数1.1),50%时为0.1 ~ 11.5(1.65),25%时为0 ~ 15.7(2.1),10%时为0.1 ~ 33.2(4.2),5%时为0.2 ~ 8.9(5.65)。与此相反,SwiftScan在75%时的SUVmax绝对值变化为0 ~ 5.4(中位数0.8),50%时为0 ~ 6.5(1.4),25%时为0 ~ 19.1(1.7),10%时为0 ~ 24.2(2.8),5%时为0 ~ 29.9(2.6)。未使用SwiftScan的对比噪声比(CNR)分别为:75%时95.3、50%时88.3、25%时69.2、10%时45.7、5%时31.6,使用SwiftScan的对比噪声比(CNR)分别为96.9、91.7、78.0、71.6、62.0。结论:使用SwiftScan, 50%的采集时间减少被认为是可接受的图像质量具有可重复的定量指标,如SUVmax和CNR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信