Borja G Cosío, Amanda Iglesias, Hanaa Shafiek, Mar Mosteiro, Inés Escribano, Nuria Toledo-Pons, Jose Luis Valera, Cristina Gómez Bellvert, Luis Pérez de Llano
{"title":"The role of bronchial biopsy in the prediction of response to biological therapy in severe uncontrolled asthma: a prospective study.","authors":"Borja G Cosío, Amanda Iglesias, Hanaa Shafiek, Mar Mosteiro, Inés Escribano, Nuria Toledo-Pons, Jose Luis Valera, Cristina Gómez Bellvert, Luis Pérez de Llano","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to two thirds of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) who received biological therapy do not have a complete response.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Can bronchial biopsy (BB) play a role in the identification of patients with SUA who has a better response to biological therapy?</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>AND METHODS: Prospective multicentre study. Consecutive SUA patients candidate to biological therapy underwent bronchoscopy and BB prior to biological therapy and clinical response was evaluated 6 months later. BB was evaluated according to a previously validated pathological score (PS) and was compared with a score of T2 inflammation (T2 score) that includes blood eosinophil count (BEC) and FeNO in predicting response to biological therapy. Response was graded as super-response, good response and partial/no response according to a composite score that includes exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, asthma control test (ACT) and improvement in FEV1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>92 patients were recruited and 78 completed the study, 63 of them received anti-IL5/5R (Mepolizumab, Reslizumab and Benralizumab) and 15 Dupilumab, being super-responders 36.5% and 26.6% respectively (p=0.126). The PS, but not the T2 score, was the only variable independently associated to response. Super-responders showed statistically significant higher PS. Response was better predicted by the PS compared to T2 score, in those receiving OCS and especially in those on anti-IL5/5R . Low tissue eosinophilia (<10 eosinophils/field) was associated to poor response to biological therapy.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>BB is more precise in the prediction of response to biological therapy than the T2 score, especially in those requiring OCS or receiving anti-IL5/5R . Tissue eosinophilia is the main driver of this predictive capacity, but there are other items in the PS related to bronchial remodeling that might be contributing to the identification of response to biological therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Up to two thirds of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) who received biological therapy do not have a complete response.
Research question: Can bronchial biopsy (BB) play a role in the identification of patients with SUA who has a better response to biological therapy?
Study design: AND METHODS: Prospective multicentre study. Consecutive SUA patients candidate to biological therapy underwent bronchoscopy and BB prior to biological therapy and clinical response was evaluated 6 months later. BB was evaluated according to a previously validated pathological score (PS) and was compared with a score of T2 inflammation (T2 score) that includes blood eosinophil count (BEC) and FeNO in predicting response to biological therapy. Response was graded as super-response, good response and partial/no response according to a composite score that includes exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, asthma control test (ACT) and improvement in FEV1.
Results: 92 patients were recruited and 78 completed the study, 63 of them received anti-IL5/5R (Mepolizumab, Reslizumab and Benralizumab) and 15 Dupilumab, being super-responders 36.5% and 26.6% respectively (p=0.126). The PS, but not the T2 score, was the only variable independently associated to response. Super-responders showed statistically significant higher PS. Response was better predicted by the PS compared to T2 score, in those receiving OCS and especially in those on anti-IL5/5R . Low tissue eosinophilia (<10 eosinophils/field) was associated to poor response to biological therapy.
Interpretation: BB is more precise in the prediction of response to biological therapy than the T2 score, especially in those requiring OCS or receiving anti-IL5/5R . Tissue eosinophilia is the main driver of this predictive capacity, but there are other items in the PS related to bronchial remodeling that might be contributing to the identification of response to biological therapy.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.