The role of bronchial biopsy in the prediction of response to biological therapy in severe uncontrolled asthma: a prospective study.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.045
Borja G Cosío, Amanda Iglesias, Hanaa Shafiek, Mar Mosteiro, Inés Escribano, Nuria Toledo-Pons, Jose Luis Valera, Cristina Gómez Bellvert, Luis Pérez de Llano
{"title":"The role of bronchial biopsy in the prediction of response to biological therapy in severe uncontrolled asthma: a prospective study.","authors":"Borja G Cosío, Amanda Iglesias, Hanaa Shafiek, Mar Mosteiro, Inés Escribano, Nuria Toledo-Pons, Jose Luis Valera, Cristina Gómez Bellvert, Luis Pérez de Llano","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to two thirds of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) who received biological therapy do not have a complete response.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Can bronchial biopsy (BB) play a role in the identification of patients with SUA who has a better response to biological therapy?</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>AND METHODS: Prospective multicentre study. Consecutive SUA patients candidate to biological therapy underwent bronchoscopy and BB prior to biological therapy and clinical response was evaluated 6 months later. BB was evaluated according to a previously validated pathological score (PS) and was compared with a score of T2 inflammation (T2 score) that includes blood eosinophil count (BEC) and FeNO in predicting response to biological therapy. Response was graded as super-response, good response and partial/no response according to a composite score that includes exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, asthma control test (ACT) and improvement in FEV1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>92 patients were recruited and 78 completed the study, 63 of them received anti-IL5/5R (Mepolizumab, Reslizumab and Benralizumab) and 15 Dupilumab, being super-responders 36.5% and 26.6% respectively (p=0.126). The PS, but not the T2 score, was the only variable independently associated to response. Super-responders showed statistically significant higher PS. Response was better predicted by the PS compared to T2 score, in those receiving OCS and especially in those on anti-IL5/5R . Low tissue eosinophilia (<10 eosinophils/field) was associated to poor response to biological therapy.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>BB is more precise in the prediction of response to biological therapy than the T2 score, especially in those requiring OCS or receiving anti-IL5/5R . Tissue eosinophilia is the main driver of this predictive capacity, but there are other items in the PS related to bronchial remodeling that might be contributing to the identification of response to biological therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Up to two thirds of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) who received biological therapy do not have a complete response.

Research question: Can bronchial biopsy (BB) play a role in the identification of patients with SUA who has a better response to biological therapy?

Study design: AND METHODS: Prospective multicentre study. Consecutive SUA patients candidate to biological therapy underwent bronchoscopy and BB prior to biological therapy and clinical response was evaluated 6 months later. BB was evaluated according to a previously validated pathological score (PS) and was compared with a score of T2 inflammation (T2 score) that includes blood eosinophil count (BEC) and FeNO in predicting response to biological therapy. Response was graded as super-response, good response and partial/no response according to a composite score that includes exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, asthma control test (ACT) and improvement in FEV1.

Results: 92 patients were recruited and 78 completed the study, 63 of them received anti-IL5/5R (Mepolizumab, Reslizumab and Benralizumab) and 15 Dupilumab, being super-responders 36.5% and 26.6% respectively (p=0.126). The PS, but not the T2 score, was the only variable independently associated to response. Super-responders showed statistically significant higher PS. Response was better predicted by the PS compared to T2 score, in those receiving OCS and especially in those on anti-IL5/5R . Low tissue eosinophilia (<10 eosinophils/field) was associated to poor response to biological therapy.

Interpretation: BB is more precise in the prediction of response to biological therapy than the T2 score, especially in those requiring OCS or receiving anti-IL5/5R . Tissue eosinophilia is the main driver of this predictive capacity, but there are other items in the PS related to bronchial remodeling that might be contributing to the identification of response to biological therapy.

支气管活检在预测严重未控制哮喘患者对生物治疗反应中的作用:一项前瞻性研究。
背景:多达三分之二的接受生物治疗的严重不受控制哮喘(SUA)患者没有完全缓解。研究问题:支气管活检(BB)能否在鉴别对生物治疗有更好反应的SUA患者中发挥作用?研究设计和方法:前瞻性多中心研究。候选生物治疗的连续SUA患者在生物治疗前接受支气管镜检查和BB, 6个月后评估临床反应。根据先前验证的病理评分(PS)评估BB,并与T2炎症评分(T2评分)进行比较,T2评分包括血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)和FeNO,以预测对生物治疗的反应。根据包括加重、口服皮质类固醇(OCS)使用、哮喘控制试验(ACT)和FEV1改善在内的综合评分,将反应分为超反应、良好反应和部分/无反应。结果:共招募92例患者,完成研究78例,其中63例接受抗il5 / 5r治疗(Mepolizumab、Reslizumab和Benralizumab), 15例Dupilumab,超应答率分别为36.5%和26.6% (p=0.126)。PS是唯一与反应独立相关的变量,而不是T2评分。在接受OCS治疗的患者中,特别是抗il5 / 5r治疗的患者,PS比T2评分更能预测患者的反应。低组织嗜酸性粒细胞(解释:在预测对生物治疗的反应方面,BB比T2评分更精确,特别是在需要OCS或接受抗il5 / 5r治疗的患者中。组织嗜酸性粒细胞是这种预测能力的主要驱动因素,但PS中还有其他与支气管重塑相关的项目可能有助于识别对生物治疗的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信