Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.025
Nicole M Robertson, Connor S Centner, Vickram Tejwani, Shakir Hossen, Dipan Karmali, Sibei Lu, Trishul Siddharthan
{"title":"Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Nicole M Robertson, Connor S Centner, Vickram Tejwani, Shakir Hossen, Dipan Karmali, Sibei Lu, Trishul Siddharthan","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of chronic respiratory diseases is increasing globally. There is evidence that those with spirometric impairment, and no evidence of obstruction, termed preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), have increased risk of morbidity and mortality, compared to those with normal lung function. There remain several gaps in characterizing PRISm.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>What is the prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with PRISm globally?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In this systematic review a comprehensive search using MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINHAL, and CENTRAL databases was conducted to include epidemiological studies with no language or data restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened citations and shortlisted full-text articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and data was extracted. Quality was assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>52 studies met the inclusion criteria with 33 studies included in the meta-analysis. Pooled PRISm prevalence was 12% (95% CI: 0.10, 0.15) with greater prevalence in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared to high-income countries (19% vs. 11%). Comorbid diabetes was a significant risk factor associated with PRISm but data for female sex and smoking were mixed. PRISm was associated with increased all-cause (OR 1.41, 95% CI:1.08, 1.83, p=0.02), cardiovascular (OR 1.84, 95% CI:1.31, 2.58, p<0.01), and respiratory mortality (OR 1.82, 95% CI:1.08, 3.05, p=0.03). PRISm was not associated with a reduced lung cancer diagnosis (p=0.46). Quality assessment analysis revealed 34.6% (n=18) studies were rated \"strong,\" 42.3% (n=22) \"moderate,\" and 23.1% (n=12) \"weak.\" Studies conducted LMICs had lower quality ratings.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Individuals with PRISm have increased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality. Recognizing and targeting modifiable PRISm risk factors may reduce the growing burden of PRISm and transition to obstructive lung disease globally. Additional studies are needed in LMICs that have unique risk factors a disease trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of chronic respiratory diseases is increasing globally. There is evidence that those with spirometric impairment, and no evidence of obstruction, termed preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), have increased risk of morbidity and mortality, compared to those with normal lung function. There remain several gaps in characterizing PRISm.

Research questions: What is the prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with PRISm globally?

Study design and methods: In this systematic review a comprehensive search using MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINHAL, and CENTRAL databases was conducted to include epidemiological studies with no language or data restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened citations and shortlisted full-text articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and data was extracted. Quality was assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool.

Results: 52 studies met the inclusion criteria with 33 studies included in the meta-analysis. Pooled PRISm prevalence was 12% (95% CI: 0.10, 0.15) with greater prevalence in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared to high-income countries (19% vs. 11%). Comorbid diabetes was a significant risk factor associated with PRISm but data for female sex and smoking were mixed. PRISm was associated with increased all-cause (OR 1.41, 95% CI:1.08, 1.83, p=0.02), cardiovascular (OR 1.84, 95% CI:1.31, 2.58, p<0.01), and respiratory mortality (OR 1.82, 95% CI:1.08, 3.05, p=0.03). PRISm was not associated with a reduced lung cancer diagnosis (p=0.46). Quality assessment analysis revealed 34.6% (n=18) studies were rated "strong," 42.3% (n=22) "moderate," and 23.1% (n=12) "weak." Studies conducted LMICs had lower quality ratings.

Interpretation: Individuals with PRISm have increased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality. Recognizing and targeting modifiable PRISm risk factors may reduce the growing burden of PRISm and transition to obstructive lung disease globally. Additional studies are needed in LMICs that have unique risk factors a disease trajectory.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信