Molecular identification of yeast communities isolated from nail specimens by PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP methods.

Q3 Medicine
Current Medical Mycology Pub Date : 2024-05-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22034/cmm.2024.345237.1539
Ahmad Jabrodini, Mitra Zaighami, Ali Khodadadi, Keyvan Pakshir, Hasti Nouraei, Hossein Khodadadi
{"title":"Molecular identification of yeast communities isolated from nail specimens by PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP methods.","authors":"Ahmad Jabrodini, Mitra Zaighami, Ali Khodadadi, Keyvan Pakshir, Hasti Nouraei, Hossein Khodadadi","doi":"10.22034/cmm.2024.345237.1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Onychomycosis is a common fungal infection that affects the nails, caused by various fungal agents. Moreover, yeast onychomycosis has increased in recent years. Yeast isolates might not be identified at the species level by conventional methods, whereas molecular methods can identify yeast isolates more accurately. This study aimed to identify yeast communities isolated from nail specimens by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and PCR- fragment size polymorphism (FSP) methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This experimental study was conducted on archival yeast isolates obtained from 269 patients suspected of onychomycosis who referred to the Medical Mycology Laboratory at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in Shiraz, Iran, between April 2022 and March 2023. Onychomycosis was confirmed through direct examination and culture of nail specimens. The PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP methods were used to identify yeast isolates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 78 (28.99%) yeast strains were identified. <i>Candida albicans</i> was the most common species, followed by <i>Candida parapsilosis</i> complex and <i>Candida tropicalis</i>. Uncommon species of yeasts, such as <i>Candida utilis</i>, <i>Candida pararugosa</i>, <i>Candida nivariensis</i>, and <i>Rhodotorula rubra</i> were identified by molecular methods. The PCR-FSP method showed a strong agreement with the PCR-RFLP method in the identification of common yeast agents causing onychomycosis (κ=0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems necessary to use molecular diagnostic tools in addition to conventional methods to identify yeast isolates in clinical laboratories. The rapid and accurate identification of fungal agents causing onychomycosis is useful for the selection of an appropriate treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10863,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Mycology","volume":"10 ","pages":"e2024.345184.1539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22034/cmm.2024.345237.1539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Onychomycosis is a common fungal infection that affects the nails, caused by various fungal agents. Moreover, yeast onychomycosis has increased in recent years. Yeast isolates might not be identified at the species level by conventional methods, whereas molecular methods can identify yeast isolates more accurately. This study aimed to identify yeast communities isolated from nail specimens by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and PCR- fragment size polymorphism (FSP) methods.

Materials and methods: This experimental study was conducted on archival yeast isolates obtained from 269 patients suspected of onychomycosis who referred to the Medical Mycology Laboratory at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in Shiraz, Iran, between April 2022 and March 2023. Onychomycosis was confirmed through direct examination and culture of nail specimens. The PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP methods were used to identify yeast isolates.

Results: In total, 78 (28.99%) yeast strains were identified. Candida albicans was the most common species, followed by Candida parapsilosis complex and Candida tropicalis. Uncommon species of yeasts, such as Candida utilis, Candida pararugosa, Candida nivariensis, and Rhodotorula rubra were identified by molecular methods. The PCR-FSP method showed a strong agreement with the PCR-RFLP method in the identification of common yeast agents causing onychomycosis (κ=0.84).

Conclusion: It seems necessary to use molecular diagnostic tools in addition to conventional methods to identify yeast isolates in clinical laboratories. The rapid and accurate identification of fungal agents causing onychomycosis is useful for the selection of an appropriate treatment strategy.

用PCR-RFLP和PCR-FSP方法鉴定指甲标本中酵母菌群。
背景和目的:甲真菌病是一种常见的影响指甲的真菌感染,由多种真菌引起。此外,近年来,酵母菌甲真菌病有所增加。酵母分离物可能无法通过传统方法在物种水平上进行鉴定,而分子方法可以更准确地鉴定酵母分离物。采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)-限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)和PCR-片段大小多态性(FSP)方法对指甲标本中分离的酵母群落进行鉴定。材料和方法:本实验研究从2022年4月至2023年3月期间向伊朗设拉子医学院医学真菌学实验室提交的269例疑似甲真菌病患者的档案酵母分离株中进行。指甲标本经直接检查和培养证实为甲真菌病。采用PCR-RFLP和PCR-FSP方法对酵母分离物进行鉴定。结果:共鉴定出酵母菌78株(28.99%)。白色念珠菌是最常见的菌种,其次是假丝酵母菌复合菌和热带念珠菌。利用分子方法鉴定了实用念珠菌、副念珠菌、尼瓦念珠菌和红色红酵母等罕见酵母菌。PCR-FSP法与PCR-RFLP法在鉴定引起甲真菌病的常见酵母菌中具有较强的一致性(κ=0.84)。结论:在常规方法的基础上,应用分子诊断工具对酵母菌分离物进行鉴定是必要的。快速准确地鉴定引起甲癣的真菌制剂对选择适当的治疗策略是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Mycology
Current Medical Mycology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信