Efficacy and safety of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus flavonoid Tablets vs. domperidone for functional dyspepsia: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled phase III trial.
M Wei, Y Chai, H Shen, M Du, X Zhou, T Liu, X Yang, S Li, J Sun, Y Ge
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus flavonoid Tablets vs. domperidone for functional dyspepsia: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled phase III trial.","authors":"M Wei, Y Chai, H Shen, M Du, X Zhou, T Liu, X Yang, S Li, J Sun, Y Ge","doi":"10.51821/87.4.13488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical management of functional dyspepsia (FD) is challenging. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus flavonoid (AFIF) tablets vs. domperidone for FD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, doubledummy, positive-controlled trial recruited FD patients, who were randomized 1:1 to the AFIF (AFIF and domperidone placebo) and domperidone (domperidone and AFIF placebo) groups. The primary endpoint was the rate of disappearance of all four FD symptoms (postprandial feeling of fullness, early satiety, upper abdominal pain, and upper abdominal burning sensation) after 4 treatment weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 120 and 119 patients were included in the AFIF and domperidone groups, respectively. The rates of disappearance of all four symptoms after 4 treatment weeks were 28.33% and 31.93% in the AFIF and domperidone groups, respectively (p=0.5748). The rate of disappearance of all four symptoms 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in the AFIF (21.05%) compared with the domperidone group (4.39%, p=0.0002). The gastric emptying rates 2h after a meal were significantly increased in both AFIF (7.58%, p<0.0001) and domperidone (6.95%, p=0.0121) groups versus baseline, without a significant between-group difference (p=0.8457). Twenty-two (1 moderate) and 43 (3 moderate) adverse events occurred in the AFIF (19.17%) and domperidone (36.13%) groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of AFIF tablets is similar to that of domperidone after 4 treatment weeks, while AFIF tablets may have a better safety profile than domperidone. Additionally, AFIF tablets have a significant advantage over domperidone in the rate of symptom disappearance 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7322,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","volume":"87 4","pages":"484-493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51821/87.4.13488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The clinical management of functional dyspepsia (FD) is challenging. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus flavonoid (AFIF) tablets vs. domperidone for FD.
Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, doubledummy, positive-controlled trial recruited FD patients, who were randomized 1:1 to the AFIF (AFIF and domperidone placebo) and domperidone (domperidone and AFIF placebo) groups. The primary endpoint was the rate of disappearance of all four FD symptoms (postprandial feeling of fullness, early satiety, upper abdominal pain, and upper abdominal burning sensation) after 4 treatment weeks.
Results: Totally 120 and 119 patients were included in the AFIF and domperidone groups, respectively. The rates of disappearance of all four symptoms after 4 treatment weeks were 28.33% and 31.93% in the AFIF and domperidone groups, respectively (p=0.5748). The rate of disappearance of all four symptoms 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in the AFIF (21.05%) compared with the domperidone group (4.39%, p=0.0002). The gastric emptying rates 2h after a meal were significantly increased in both AFIF (7.58%, p<0.0001) and domperidone (6.95%, p=0.0121) groups versus baseline, without a significant between-group difference (p=0.8457). Twenty-two (1 moderate) and 43 (3 moderate) adverse events occurred in the AFIF (19.17%) and domperidone (36.13%) groups, respectively.
Conclusion: The efficacy of AFIF tablets is similar to that of domperidone after 4 treatment weeks, while AFIF tablets may have a better safety profile than domperidone. Additionally, AFIF tablets have a significant advantage over domperidone in the rate of symptom disappearance 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.