Managing Friends and Foes: Sanctioning Mutualists in Mixed-Infection Nodules Trades off With Defense Against Antagonists

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Camille E. Wendlandt, Saumik Basu, Angeliqua P. Montoya, Paige Roberts, Justin D. Stewart, Allison B. Coffin, David W. Crowder, E. Toby Kiers, Stephanie S. Porter
{"title":"Managing Friends and Foes: Sanctioning Mutualists in Mixed-Infection Nodules Trades off With Defense Against Antagonists","authors":"Camille E. Wendlandt,&nbsp;Saumik Basu,&nbsp;Angeliqua P. Montoya,&nbsp;Paige Roberts,&nbsp;Justin D. Stewart,&nbsp;Allison B. Coffin,&nbsp;David W. Crowder,&nbsp;E. Toby Kiers,&nbsp;Stephanie S. Porter","doi":"10.1111/eva.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Successful plant growth requires plants to minimize harm from antagonists and maximize benefit from mutualists. However, these outcomes may be difficult to achieve simultaneously, since plant defenses activated in response to antagonists can compromise mutualism function, and plant resources allocated to defense may trade off with resources allocated to managing mutualists. Here, we investigate how antagonist attack affects plant ability to manage mutualists with sanctions, in which a plant rewards cooperative mutualists and/or punishes uncooperative mutualists. We studied interactions among wild and domesticated pea plants, pea aphids, an aphid-vectored virus (Pea Enation Mosaic Virus, PEMV), and mutualistic rhizobial bacteria that fix nitrogen in root nodules. Using isogenic rhizobial strains that differ in their ability to fix nitrogen and express contrasting fluorescent proteins, we found that peas demonstrated sanctions in both singly-infected nodules and mixed-infection nodules containing both strains. However, the plant's ability to manage mutualists in mixed-infection nodules traded off with its ability to defend against antagonists: when plants were attacked by aphids, they stopped sanctioning within mixed-infection nodules, and plants that exerted stricter sanctions within nodules during aphid attack accumulated higher levels of the aphid-vectored virus, PEMV. Our findings suggest that plants engaged in defense against antagonists suffer a reduced ability to select for the most beneficial symbionts in mixed-infection tissues. Mixed-infection tissues may be relatively common in this mutualism, and reduced plant sanctions in these tissues could provide a refuge for uncooperative mutualists and compromise the benefit that plants obtain from mutualistic symbionts during antagonist attack. Understanding the conflicting selective pressures plants face in complex biotic environments will be crucial for breeding crop varieties that can maximize benefits from mutualists even when they encounter antagonists.</p>","PeriodicalId":168,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Applications","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Applications","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eva.70064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successful plant growth requires plants to minimize harm from antagonists and maximize benefit from mutualists. However, these outcomes may be difficult to achieve simultaneously, since plant defenses activated in response to antagonists can compromise mutualism function, and plant resources allocated to defense may trade off with resources allocated to managing mutualists. Here, we investigate how antagonist attack affects plant ability to manage mutualists with sanctions, in which a plant rewards cooperative mutualists and/or punishes uncooperative mutualists. We studied interactions among wild and domesticated pea plants, pea aphids, an aphid-vectored virus (Pea Enation Mosaic Virus, PEMV), and mutualistic rhizobial bacteria that fix nitrogen in root nodules. Using isogenic rhizobial strains that differ in their ability to fix nitrogen and express contrasting fluorescent proteins, we found that peas demonstrated sanctions in both singly-infected nodules and mixed-infection nodules containing both strains. However, the plant's ability to manage mutualists in mixed-infection nodules traded off with its ability to defend against antagonists: when plants were attacked by aphids, they stopped sanctioning within mixed-infection nodules, and plants that exerted stricter sanctions within nodules during aphid attack accumulated higher levels of the aphid-vectored virus, PEMV. Our findings suggest that plants engaged in defense against antagonists suffer a reduced ability to select for the most beneficial symbionts in mixed-infection tissues. Mixed-infection tissues may be relatively common in this mutualism, and reduced plant sanctions in these tissues could provide a refuge for uncooperative mutualists and compromise the benefit that plants obtain from mutualistic symbionts during antagonist attack. Understanding the conflicting selective pressures plants face in complex biotic environments will be crucial for breeding crop varieties that can maximize benefits from mutualists even when they encounter antagonists.

Abstract Image

管理朋友和敌人:在混合感染结核中制裁互惠主义者与防御拮抗剂相权衡。
成功的植物生长要求植物尽量减少拮抗物的伤害,尽量增加共生物的益处。然而,这些结果可能很难同时实现,因为对拮抗激活的植物防御可能会损害互惠共生的功能,分配给防御的植物资源可能会与分配给管理互惠共生的资源进行权衡。在这里,我们研究了拮抗剂攻击如何影响植物通过制裁来管理互惠互利者的能力,在制裁中,植物奖励合作互惠互利者和/或惩罚不合作互惠互利者。我们研究了野生和驯化豌豆植物、豌豆蚜虫、一种蚜虫载体病毒(pea Enation Mosaic virus, PEMV)和在根瘤中固定氮的共生根瘤菌之间的相互作用。利用固定氮和表达荧光蛋白能力不同的等基因根瘤菌菌株,我们发现豌豆在单感染根瘤和含有两种菌株的混合感染根瘤中都表现出了耐药性。然而,在混合感染根瘤中,植物管理共生菌的能力与其防御拮抗剂的能力相互抵消:当植物受到蚜虫攻击时,它们在混合感染根瘤中停止制裁,而在蚜虫攻击时,在根瘤中施加更严格制裁的植物积累了更高水平的蚜虫载体病毒PEMV。我们的研究结果表明,参与防御拮抗剂的植物在混合感染组织中选择最有益的共生体的能力降低。混合感染组织在这种共生关系中可能相对常见,这些组织中植物制裁的减少可能为不合作的共生体提供避难所,并损害植物在拮抗剂攻击期间从共生共生体获得的利益。了解植物在复杂的生物环境中面临的相互冲突的选择压力,对于培育作物品种至关重要,这些品种可以在遇到拮抗物时也能最大限度地从互惠共生中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Applications
Evolutionary Applications 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Applications is a fully peer reviewed open access journal. It publishes papers that utilize concepts from evolutionary biology to address biological questions of health, social and economic relevance. Papers are expected to employ evolutionary concepts or methods to make contributions to areas such as (but not limited to): medicine, agriculture, forestry, exploitation and management (fisheries and wildlife), aquaculture, conservation biology, environmental sciences (including climate change and invasion biology), microbiology, and toxicology. All taxonomic groups are covered from microbes, fungi, plants and animals. In order to better serve the community, we also now strongly encourage submissions of papers making use of modern molecular and genetic methods (population and functional genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, quantitative genetics, association and linkage mapping) to address important questions in any of these disciplines and in an applied evolutionary framework. Theoretical, empirical, synthesis or perspective papers are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信