Janus-kinase inhibitor use in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases beyond licensed indications: A scoping review

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Dimitris Challoumas , Cameron Simpson , Matthew Arnold , Philip Mease , Robert Moots , Mwidimi Ndosi , Zoe Rutter Locher
{"title":"Janus-kinase inhibitor use in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases beyond licensed indications: A scoping review","authors":"Dimitris Challoumas ,&nbsp;Cameron Simpson ,&nbsp;Matthew Arnold ,&nbsp;Philip Mease ,&nbsp;Robert Moots ,&nbsp;Mwidimi Ndosi ,&nbsp;Zoe Rutter Locher","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) beyond licence is expanding rapidly. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and present the available evidence on the efficacy of JAKis in all conditions without marketing authorisation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Through a systematic literature search we identified studies including 5 or more patients that assessed the use of any JAKi for any efficacy outcome. Quantitative analyses in the form of pairwise meta-analyses were performed for eligible data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-three (<em>n</em> = 83) studies in total were included in our review, assessing efficacy of JAKis in 34 IMIDs. In most conditions, JAKis exhibited generally positive effects, though the majority of evidence came from observational, non-comparative studies. Pairwise meta-analyses were possible for hidradenitis suppurativa and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For hidradenitis suppurativa, we found a clear benefit of treatment with JAKis compared with placebo in achieving clinical response [OR 2.35, 95 % CI (1.24 to 4.46)]. For treatment-resistant SLE, the results were equivocal; JAKi showed some benefit over placebo but statistical significance was only reached for one of the two meta-analysed outcome measures [SLE Responder Index 4, OR 1.41, 95 % CI (1.01 to 1.98); SLE Disease Activity Index 2000; OR 1.36, 95 % CI (0.99 to 1.88)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is a rapidly increasing use of JAKis beyond current licencing in most IMIDs. Large comparative trials are necessary to confirm efficacy and guide future licencing decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"24 3","pages":"Article 103736"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224002271","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) beyond licence is expanding rapidly. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and present the available evidence on the efficacy of JAKis in all conditions without marketing authorisation.

Methods

Through a systematic literature search we identified studies including 5 or more patients that assessed the use of any JAKi for any efficacy outcome. Quantitative analyses in the form of pairwise meta-analyses were performed for eligible data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only.

Results

Eighty-three (n = 83) studies in total were included in our review, assessing efficacy of JAKis in 34 IMIDs. In most conditions, JAKis exhibited generally positive effects, though the majority of evidence came from observational, non-comparative studies. Pairwise meta-analyses were possible for hidradenitis suppurativa and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For hidradenitis suppurativa, we found a clear benefit of treatment with JAKis compared with placebo in achieving clinical response [OR 2.35, 95 % CI (1.24 to 4.46)]. For treatment-resistant SLE, the results were equivocal; JAKi showed some benefit over placebo but statistical significance was only reached for one of the two meta-analysed outcome measures [SLE Responder Index 4, OR 1.41, 95 % CI (1.01 to 1.98); SLE Disease Activity Index 2000; OR 1.36, 95 % CI (0.99 to 1.88)].

Conclusions

There is a rapidly increasing use of JAKis beyond current licencing in most IMIDs. Large comparative trials are necessary to confirm efficacy and guide future licencing decisions.
janus -激酶抑制剂在免疫介导的炎症性疾病中的应用:一项范围审查。
janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)在免疫介导性炎症(IMIDs)中的应用正在迅速扩大。本次范围审查的目的是确定并提出JAKi在所有条件下未经上市许可的有效性的现有证据。方法:通过详细的文献检索,我们确定了包括5名或更多患者的研究,这些研究评估了使用任何JAKi的任何疗效结果。仅对随机对照试验(rct)的合格数据进行两两荟萃分析形式的定量分析。结果:我们的综述共纳入84项(n = 83)研究,评估了JAKi在34例IMIDs中的疗效。在大多数情况下,JAKi表现出普遍的积极作用,尽管大多数证据来自观察性研究,非比较研究。对化脓性汗腺炎和系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)进行两两荟萃分析是可能的。对于化脓性汗腺炎,我们发现与安慰剂相比,JAKi治疗在获得临床反应方面有明显的益处[OR为2.35(1.24 - 4.46)]。对于治疗抵抗性SLE,结果是模棱两可的;JAKi和安慰剂有利于JAKi,但两项荟萃分析结果测量中只有一项达到统计学显著性[SLE应答指数4,OR 1.41(1.01至1.98);SLE疾病活动指数2000;OR 1.36(0.99 - 1.88)]。结论:在大多数IMIDs中,JAKi的使用迅速增加,超出了目前的许可范围。为了提供明确的答案,并有助于未来的许可决定,有必要进行大规模的比较试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autoimmunity reviews
Autoimmunity reviews 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
24.70
自引率
4.40%
发文量
164
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers. The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences. In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations. Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信