Dimitris Challoumas , Cameron Simpson , Matthew Arnold , Philip Mease , Robert Moots , Mwidimi Ndosi , Zoe Rutter Locher
{"title":"Janus-kinase inhibitor use in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases beyond licensed indications: A scoping review","authors":"Dimitris Challoumas , Cameron Simpson , Matthew Arnold , Philip Mease , Robert Moots , Mwidimi Ndosi , Zoe Rutter Locher","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) beyond licence is expanding rapidly. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and present the available evidence on the efficacy of JAKis in all conditions without marketing authorisation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Through a systematic literature search we identified studies including 5 or more patients that assessed the use of any JAKi for any efficacy outcome. Quantitative analyses in the form of pairwise meta-analyses were performed for eligible data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-three (<em>n</em> = 83) studies in total were included in our review, assessing efficacy of JAKis in 34 IMIDs. In most conditions, JAKis exhibited generally positive effects, though the majority of evidence came from observational, non-comparative studies. Pairwise meta-analyses were possible for hidradenitis suppurativa and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For hidradenitis suppurativa, we found a clear benefit of treatment with JAKis compared with placebo in achieving clinical response [OR 2.35, 95 % CI (1.24 to 4.46)]. For treatment-resistant SLE, the results were equivocal; JAKi showed some benefit over placebo but statistical significance was only reached for one of the two meta-analysed outcome measures [SLE Responder Index 4, OR 1.41, 95 % CI (1.01 to 1.98); SLE Disease Activity Index 2000; OR 1.36, 95 % CI (0.99 to 1.88)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is a rapidly increasing use of JAKis beyond current licencing in most IMIDs. Large comparative trials are necessary to confirm efficacy and guide future licencing decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"24 3","pages":"Article 103736"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224002271","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) beyond licence is expanding rapidly. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and present the available evidence on the efficacy of JAKis in all conditions without marketing authorisation.
Methods
Through a systematic literature search we identified studies including 5 or more patients that assessed the use of any JAKi for any efficacy outcome. Quantitative analyses in the form of pairwise meta-analyses were performed for eligible data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only.
Results
Eighty-three (n = 83) studies in total were included in our review, assessing efficacy of JAKis in 34 IMIDs. In most conditions, JAKis exhibited generally positive effects, though the majority of evidence came from observational, non-comparative studies. Pairwise meta-analyses were possible for hidradenitis suppurativa and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For hidradenitis suppurativa, we found a clear benefit of treatment with JAKis compared with placebo in achieving clinical response [OR 2.35, 95 % CI (1.24 to 4.46)]. For treatment-resistant SLE, the results were equivocal; JAKi showed some benefit over placebo but statistical significance was only reached for one of the two meta-analysed outcome measures [SLE Responder Index 4, OR 1.41, 95 % CI (1.01 to 1.98); SLE Disease Activity Index 2000; OR 1.36, 95 % CI (0.99 to 1.88)].
Conclusions
There is a rapidly increasing use of JAKis beyond current licencing in most IMIDs. Large comparative trials are necessary to confirm efficacy and guide future licencing decisions.
期刊介绍:
Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers.
The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences.
In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations.
Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.