A new calcite reference material for in situ oxygen isotope analysis using secondary ion mass spectrometry: development and application constraints†

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Xuna Yin, Miaohong He, Le Zhang, Wenfeng Deng, Yangrui Guo, Zexian Cui, Qing Yang, Yanqiang Zhang and Gangjian Wei
{"title":"A new calcite reference material for in situ oxygen isotope analysis using secondary ion mass spectrometry: development and application constraints†","authors":"Xuna Yin, Miaohong He, Le Zhang, Wenfeng Deng, Yangrui Guo, Zexian Cui, Qing Yang, Yanqiang Zhang and Gangjian Wei","doi":"10.1039/D4JA00345D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The oxygen isotopic microanalysis of calcite is essential for obtaining high spatial resolution data linked to microstructures, a challenge for conventional techniques. This analysis, however, relies heavily on matrix-matched reference materials, of which only a few calcite standards are available. In this study, an inorganically precipitated calcite vein sample (WS-1) was evaluated through 225 SIMS oxygen isotope analyses and was found to have a homogeneous isotopic composition, with an external reproducibility ≤0.21‰ (1<em>σ</em>), suggesting its potential as a SIMS reference material. The precise <em>δ</em><small><sup>18</sup></small>O<small><sub>VPDB</sub></small> value, determined <em>via</em> traditional gas-source IRMS, was −16.52 ± 0.13‰ (1SD). Matrix effects were assessed using various carbonates, including abiotic aragonite (VS001/1-A), three abiotic calcites (NBS18, Cal-1, WS-1), and a high-Mg calcite (gorgonian coral). The results revealed negligible matrix effects between abiotic aragonite and calcites but significant differences between calcites and high-Mg calcite, likely due to Mg content or differences in biogenic crystal morphology and trace organic composition. This study demonstrates the utility of <em>in situ</em> oxygen isotopic microanalysis for calcite but emphasizes the need for caution when analyzing high-Mg calcitic skeletons.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 1","pages":" 104-109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ja/d4ja00345d","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The oxygen isotopic microanalysis of calcite is essential for obtaining high spatial resolution data linked to microstructures, a challenge for conventional techniques. This analysis, however, relies heavily on matrix-matched reference materials, of which only a few calcite standards are available. In this study, an inorganically precipitated calcite vein sample (WS-1) was evaluated through 225 SIMS oxygen isotope analyses and was found to have a homogeneous isotopic composition, with an external reproducibility ≤0.21‰ (1σ), suggesting its potential as a SIMS reference material. The precise δ18OVPDB value, determined via traditional gas-source IRMS, was −16.52 ± 0.13‰ (1SD). Matrix effects were assessed using various carbonates, including abiotic aragonite (VS001/1-A), three abiotic calcites (NBS18, Cal-1, WS-1), and a high-Mg calcite (gorgonian coral). The results revealed negligible matrix effects between abiotic aragonite and calcites but significant differences between calcites and high-Mg calcite, likely due to Mg content or differences in biogenic crystal morphology and trace organic composition. This study demonstrates the utility of in situ oxygen isotopic microanalysis for calcite but emphasizes the need for caution when analyzing high-Mg calcitic skeletons.

Abstract Image

一种用于二次离子质谱原位氧同位素分析的方解石标准物质:发展和应用限制
方解石的氧同位素微分析对于获得与微观结构相关的高空间分辨率数据至关重要,这是传统技术的一个挑战。然而,这种分析在很大程度上依赖于基质匹配的参考物质,其中只有少数方解石标准物可用。本文通过225次SIMS氧同位素分析对某无机沉淀方解石脉样(WS-1)进行了评价,发现其同位素组成均匀,外部重现性≤0.21‰(1σ),具有作为SIMS参考物质的潜力。通过传统气源IRMS测定的δ18OVPDB精确值为- 16.52±0.13‰(1SD)。基质效应采用多种碳酸盐进行评估,包括非生物文石(VS001/1-A)、三种非生物方解石(NBS18、Cal-1、WS-1)和一种高镁方解石(柳珊瑚)。结果显示,非生物文石和方解石之间的基质效应可以忽略不计,但方解石和高镁方解石之间存在显著差异,这可能是由于镁含量或生物成因晶体形态和微量有机成分的差异。这项研究证明了原位氧同位素微分析方解石的实用性,但强调了在分析高镁方解石骨架时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
26.50%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Innovative research on the fundamental theory and application of spectrometric techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信