Improving Electromyography Electrode Placement Accuracy in Transtibial Amputees: A Comparative Study of Ultrasound and Palpation Methods

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Faranak Rostamjoud;Friðrika Björk Þorkelsdóttir;Atli Örn Sverrisson;Sigurður Brynjólfsson;Kristín Briem
{"title":"Improving Electromyography Electrode Placement Accuracy in Transtibial Amputees: A Comparative Study of Ultrasound and Palpation Methods","authors":"Faranak Rostamjoud;Friðrika Björk Þorkelsdóttir;Atli Örn Sverrisson;Sigurður Brynjólfsson;Kristín Briem","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3520720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past decade, significant focus has been on electromyography (EMG) control of prostheses in transtibial amputees (TTAs). Reliable signal acquisition requires accurate EMG electrode placement. Conventional electrode placement methods are challenging due to altered post-surgical anatomy. This study investigated the application of ultrasound imaging for placement of EMG electrodes in TTAs. Four residual limb muscles, Tibialis Anterior (TA), Peroneus Longus (PL), Gastrocnemius Medial (GM), and Gastrocnemius Lateral (GL), were examined in 9 unilateral TTAs. Ultrasound was used to identify each muscle belly’s thickest part and fiber orientation. A Certified Prosthetist Orthotist (CPO) then performed palpation to identify muscle bellies, blinded to ultrasound findings. Distances between ultrasound- and palpation-identified spots were measured. EMG data were contrasted between methods in terms of root mean square (RMS) amplitude and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The results indicated that Ultrasound-guided placement produced slightly higher, though non-significant, signal amplitudes (p =0.06) and significantly higher SNR (p =0.04). Moreover, palpation misidentified muscles in four cases. In 72.2% of cases, the distance between ultrasound- and palpation-identified spots was more than 10 mm. The mean distance was the greatest for PL and GL. Relying on palpation to identify PL and TA in TTAs may provide irrelevant EMG due to erroneous placement. Using ultrasound imaging can avoid this and, in addition to accurate muscle identification, may improve signal amplitude and SNR. In conclusion, ultrasound imaging is a valuable tool for enhancing the accuracy of EMG electrode placement in TTAs, which may lead to better prosthetic control outcomes.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"33 ","pages":"133-139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10810499","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10810499/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past decade, significant focus has been on electromyography (EMG) control of prostheses in transtibial amputees (TTAs). Reliable signal acquisition requires accurate EMG electrode placement. Conventional electrode placement methods are challenging due to altered post-surgical anatomy. This study investigated the application of ultrasound imaging for placement of EMG electrodes in TTAs. Four residual limb muscles, Tibialis Anterior (TA), Peroneus Longus (PL), Gastrocnemius Medial (GM), and Gastrocnemius Lateral (GL), were examined in 9 unilateral TTAs. Ultrasound was used to identify each muscle belly’s thickest part and fiber orientation. A Certified Prosthetist Orthotist (CPO) then performed palpation to identify muscle bellies, blinded to ultrasound findings. Distances between ultrasound- and palpation-identified spots were measured. EMG data were contrasted between methods in terms of root mean square (RMS) amplitude and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The results indicated that Ultrasound-guided placement produced slightly higher, though non-significant, signal amplitudes (p =0.06) and significantly higher SNR (p =0.04). Moreover, palpation misidentified muscles in four cases. In 72.2% of cases, the distance between ultrasound- and palpation-identified spots was more than 10 mm. The mean distance was the greatest for PL and GL. Relying on palpation to identify PL and TA in TTAs may provide irrelevant EMG due to erroneous placement. Using ultrasound imaging can avoid this and, in addition to accurate muscle identification, may improve signal amplitude and SNR. In conclusion, ultrasound imaging is a valuable tool for enhancing the accuracy of EMG electrode placement in TTAs, which may lead to better prosthetic control outcomes.
超声与触诊方法的比较研究:提高经胫截肢者肌电电极放置的准确性
在过去的十年中,肌电图(EMG)控制已成为跨胫截肢者(TTAs)假肢的重要焦点。可靠的信号采集需要准确的肌电图电极放置。由于术后解剖结构的改变,传统的电极放置方法具有挑战性。本研究探讨了超声成像在颞下颌颞叶肌电图电极放置中的应用。4个残肢肌肉,胫骨前肌(TA)、腓骨长肌(PL)、腓肠肌内侧肌(GM)和腓肠肌外侧肌(GL)在9个单侧TTAs中被检查。超声识别各肌腹最厚部位及纤维方向。一名注册假肢矫形师(CPO)随后进行触诊以识别肌肉腹部,对超声结果不知情。测量超声和触诊发现的斑点之间的距离。两种方法的肌电数据在均方根(RMS)振幅和信噪比(SNR)方面进行对比。结果表明,超声引导放置产生的信号幅度略高,但不显著(p =0.06),信噪比显著高(p =0.04)。此外,触诊错误识别肌肉的4例。在72.2%的病例中,超声和触诊之间的距离大于10毫米。PL和GL的平均距离最大。依靠触诊来识别TTAs中的PL和TA可能由于位置错误而提供不相关的肌电图。使用超声成像可以避免这种情况,除了准确的肌肉识别外,还可以提高信号幅度和信噪比。总之,超声成像是一种有价值的工具,可以提高肌电图电极在TTAs中放置的准确性,这可能会导致更好的假肢控制结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信