Economic and Environmental Feasibility Evaluation Study of Hydrometallurgical Recycling Methods for Perovskite Solar Cells

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Hyunmin Oh, Jongil Bae, Jeehoon Han
{"title":"Economic and Environmental Feasibility Evaluation Study of Hydrometallurgical Recycling Methods for Perovskite Solar Cells","authors":"Hyunmin Oh, Jongil Bae, Jeehoon Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the economic and environmental feasibility of three processes to recycle perovskite solar cells (PSCs) that contain lead ions: two adsorption methods, one with HAF/Fe adsorbent (Case 1) and one with WAC-resin (Case 2) adsorbent, and one extraction method that uses water (Case 3). Techno-economic analysis (TEA) indicates that Case 2 is more economically feasible (-2.54 US$ m<sup>-2</sup> PSCs) than Case 1 (447.07 US$ m<sup>-2</sup> PSCs) and Case 3 (2.48 US$ m<sup>-2</sup> PSCs). A life cycle analysis (LCA) was also conducted for four impact categories, global-warming potential (GWP), terrestrial ecotoxicity (TETP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and human toxicity (HTP). These analyses indicate that Case 3 is less environmentally damaging (-0.04 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-Eq, 12,91 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, -14.55 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, and 3.50 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, respectively) than Case 1 and Case 2. Sensitivity analysis of TEA and LCA reveals that the solvent reusability (0–30 times) is the dominant economic and environmental indicator for all PSCs recycling processes, especially Case 1 (447.07 – 11.30 US$ m<sup>-2</sup> PSCs, 3.83 – 0.55 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-Eq, 2.75 – 2.73 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, 0.26 – 0.22 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, 90.12 – 22.00 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, respectively). Transportation distance of discarded PSCs, adsorbent price, and adsorbent reusability were also found to be major process variables affecting economic and environmental performance. This study provides future guidelines for the development of more economical and environmentally-benign hydrometallurgical processes to recycle PSCs.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the economic and environmental feasibility of three processes to recycle perovskite solar cells (PSCs) that contain lead ions: two adsorption methods, one with HAF/Fe adsorbent (Case 1) and one with WAC-resin (Case 2) adsorbent, and one extraction method that uses water (Case 3). Techno-economic analysis (TEA) indicates that Case 2 is more economically feasible (-2.54 US$ m-2 PSCs) than Case 1 (447.07 US$ m-2 PSCs) and Case 3 (2.48 US$ m-2 PSCs). A life cycle analysis (LCA) was also conducted for four impact categories, global-warming potential (GWP), terrestrial ecotoxicity (TETP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and human toxicity (HTP). These analyses indicate that Case 3 is less environmentally damaging (-0.04 kg CO2-Eq, 12,91 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, -14.55 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, and 3.50 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, respectively) than Case 1 and Case 2. Sensitivity analysis of TEA and LCA reveals that the solvent reusability (0–30 times) is the dominant economic and environmental indicator for all PSCs recycling processes, especially Case 1 (447.07 – 11.30 US$ m-2 PSCs, 3.83 – 0.55 kg CO2-Eq, 2.75 – 2.73 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, 0.26 – 0.22 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, 90.12 – 22.00 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, respectively). Transportation distance of discarded PSCs, adsorbent price, and adsorbent reusability were also found to be major process variables affecting economic and environmental performance. This study provides future guidelines for the development of more economical and environmentally-benign hydrometallurgical processes to recycle PSCs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信