The relationship between symptoms and regurgitant severity in primary mitral regurgitation: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Seth Uretsky, SakulSakul, Jonathan Igancio, Andrea Vegh, Thomas Maher, Islamiyat Babs Animashaun, Stephen J Horgan, Adeniyi Okunade, Matthew F Schaikewitz, Eric Hsieh, John R Rutledge, Steven D Wolff
{"title":"The relationship between symptoms and regurgitant severity in primary mitral regurgitation: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.","authors":"Seth Uretsky, SakulSakul, Jonathan Igancio, Andrea Vegh, Thomas Maher, Islamiyat Babs Animashaun, Stephen J Horgan, Adeniyi Okunade, Matthew F Schaikewitz, Eric Hsieh, John R Rutledge, Steven D Wolff","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03308-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the ACC/AHA guidelines, the presence of symptoms plays a central role in determining timing surgery in primary mitral regurgitation (MR). Studies have shown a disconnect between the severity of MR and symptoms. The purpose of this study is to assess risk factors for symptoms in patients with chronic primary MR. There were 430 patients with degenerative MR and preserved left ventricular function who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). MR volume (MRV) and MR fraction (MRF) were categorized as per the ACC/AHA guidelines. Patients were divided into three groups based on category of MRV and MRF: (1) MRV category > MRF category (V > F), (2) MRV = MRF category (V = F), and (3) MRV < MRF category (V < F). Symptoms were defined as shortness of breath, fatigue, and decreased exercise capacity and extracted from chart review. There were 134 (38%) patients who reported symptoms. Based on MRV, 236 (55%), 125 (29%), and 69 (16%) patients had mild moderate, and severe MR respectively. Based on MRF, 257 (60%), 130 (30%), and 43 (10%) patients had mild moderate, and severe MR respectively. There was no increase in the prevalence of symptoms with worsening MRV severity (39%, 40% and 30% for mild, moderate and severe MRV respectively, p = 0.4). There was a trend for increase in the prevalence of symptoms in patients with severe MRF (35%, 40% and 54% for mild, moderate and severe MRF respectively, p = 0.054). There was a significant increase in the prevalence of symptoms when comparing V > F, V = F, and V < F (20%, 40%, and 72% respectively, p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, risk factors for symptoms were age, female sex, MRF, and having a V < F. In patients undergoing CMR with degenerative MR the prevalence of symptoms do not increase with worsening MRV. MRV and MRF were not risk factors for symptoms but having V < F was a risk factors for the presence of symptoms. These findings suggest that symptomatic patients with MR may have other pathology which may be responsible for their symptoms. Further studies are needed to better characterize the relationship between MR severity and symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03308-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the ACC/AHA guidelines, the presence of symptoms plays a central role in determining timing surgery in primary mitral regurgitation (MR). Studies have shown a disconnect between the severity of MR and symptoms. The purpose of this study is to assess risk factors for symptoms in patients with chronic primary MR. There were 430 patients with degenerative MR and preserved left ventricular function who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). MR volume (MRV) and MR fraction (MRF) were categorized as per the ACC/AHA guidelines. Patients were divided into three groups based on category of MRV and MRF: (1) MRV category > MRF category (V > F), (2) MRV = MRF category (V = F), and (3) MRV < MRF category (V < F). Symptoms were defined as shortness of breath, fatigue, and decreased exercise capacity and extracted from chart review. There were 134 (38%) patients who reported symptoms. Based on MRV, 236 (55%), 125 (29%), and 69 (16%) patients had mild moderate, and severe MR respectively. Based on MRF, 257 (60%), 130 (30%), and 43 (10%) patients had mild moderate, and severe MR respectively. There was no increase in the prevalence of symptoms with worsening MRV severity (39%, 40% and 30% for mild, moderate and severe MRV respectively, p = 0.4). There was a trend for increase in the prevalence of symptoms in patients with severe MRF (35%, 40% and 54% for mild, moderate and severe MRF respectively, p = 0.054). There was a significant increase in the prevalence of symptoms when comparing V > F, V = F, and V < F (20%, 40%, and 72% respectively, p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, risk factors for symptoms were age, female sex, MRF, and having a V < F. In patients undergoing CMR with degenerative MR the prevalence of symptoms do not increase with worsening MRV. MRV and MRF were not risk factors for symptoms but having V < F was a risk factors for the presence of symptoms. These findings suggest that symptomatic patients with MR may have other pathology which may be responsible for their symptoms. Further studies are needed to better characterize the relationship between MR severity and symptoms.

原发性二尖瓣反流症状与反流严重程度的关系:一项心血管磁共振研究
在ACC/AHA指南中,症状的存在是决定原发性二尖瓣反流(MR)手术时机的核心因素。研究表明,MR的严重程度与症状之间存在脱节。本研究的目的是评估慢性原发性MR患者症状的危险因素。430例患有退行性MR并保留左心室功能的患者接受了心血管磁共振(CMR)。根据ACC/AHA指南对MR体积(MRV)和MR分数(MRF)进行分类。根据MRV和MRF的类别将患者分为三组:(1)MRV类别> MRF类别(V > F), (2) MRV = MRF类别(V = F), (3) MRV F、V = F、V
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信