Comparison of Bupivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine versus Bupivacaine plus Fentanyl for Caudal Block in Pediatric Infraumbilical Surgery.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2025-01-01
M K K Khan, M H O Rashid, N A S Rubel, M K B Khan, I Z Sarna, M Sonaullah
{"title":"Comparison of Bupivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine versus Bupivacaine plus Fentanyl for Caudal Block in Pediatric Infraumbilical Surgery.","authors":"M K K Khan, M H O Rashid, N A S Rubel, M K B Khan, I Z Sarna, M Sonaullah","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different additives have been used to improve the duration and quality of analgesia of the local anaesthetic used in the single-dose caudal block technique, such as opioids, epinephrine, clonidine, neostigmine, etc. Dexmedetomidine is a potent and a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist having a sympatholytic, sedative, and analgesic effect and has been described as a safe and effective additive in many anaesthetic and analgesic techniques. Another agent is Fentanyl, a lipophilic opioid, is added frequently to local anaesthetics which least likely to cause respiratory depression when given extradurally, because of its high lipid solubility. It improves and prolongs the analgesia following the addition with bupivacaine for lower abdominal or infraumbilical procedures. The study was aimed to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus bupivacaine with fentanyl for caudal block in pediatric infraumbilical surgery. This experimental study was carried out in Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh from 12 May 2019 to 11 November 2019. Total 60 patients, classified by American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status category I-II, listed for infraumbilical surgery under caudal block were randomized by card method in two groups of 30 patients each. Anaesthetics were given by using a standardized protocol for induction, maintenance and recovery. Group BD (n=30) patients was given 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine with 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% and Group BF (n=30) was given 1 μg/kg fentanyl with 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% for caudal epidural analgesia. Mean age of the patients were 6.1±1.7 years and 6.3±1.2 years in BD and BF group respectively. No significant differences were found between groups with respect to age (p=0.721). Male and female ratio was 1.12:1. In group BD 19(63.3%) patients had ASA I and 11(36.7%) ASA II. In group BF 22(73.4%) of patients had ASA I and 8(26.6%) had ASA II. Baseline heart rate was 95.2 and 98.4 beat/min in group BD and BF respectively. After 15 minute heart rate was found 94.4 beat/min in group BD and 90.9 beat/min in group BF. After 30 minute heart rate was 88.7 beat/min in group BD and 85.2 beat/min in group BF. This study showed statistical comparison of postoperative mean RASS scale and CHEOPS at different time interval between three groups. The corresponding mean differences in various groups were comparable and statistically significant (p<0.05). In group BD score was better than BF and the difference of group BD vs. group BF was significant except at base line, 90 min, 120 min (p>0.05). Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine is better than fentanyl in infraumbilical surgery has longer sedation and longer postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine potentiates the action of local anaesthetics without increasing the incidence of side-effects compared to fentanyl.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"34 1","pages":"57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different additives have been used to improve the duration and quality of analgesia of the local anaesthetic used in the single-dose caudal block technique, such as opioids, epinephrine, clonidine, neostigmine, etc. Dexmedetomidine is a potent and a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist having a sympatholytic, sedative, and analgesic effect and has been described as a safe and effective additive in many anaesthetic and analgesic techniques. Another agent is Fentanyl, a lipophilic opioid, is added frequently to local anaesthetics which least likely to cause respiratory depression when given extradurally, because of its high lipid solubility. It improves and prolongs the analgesia following the addition with bupivacaine for lower abdominal or infraumbilical procedures. The study was aimed to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus bupivacaine with fentanyl for caudal block in pediatric infraumbilical surgery. This experimental study was carried out in Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh from 12 May 2019 to 11 November 2019. Total 60 patients, classified by American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status category I-II, listed for infraumbilical surgery under caudal block were randomized by card method in two groups of 30 patients each. Anaesthetics were given by using a standardized protocol for induction, maintenance and recovery. Group BD (n=30) patients was given 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine with 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% and Group BF (n=30) was given 1 μg/kg fentanyl with 0.5 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% for caudal epidural analgesia. Mean age of the patients were 6.1±1.7 years and 6.3±1.2 years in BD and BF group respectively. No significant differences were found between groups with respect to age (p=0.721). Male and female ratio was 1.12:1. In group BD 19(63.3%) patients had ASA I and 11(36.7%) ASA II. In group BF 22(73.4%) of patients had ASA I and 8(26.6%) had ASA II. Baseline heart rate was 95.2 and 98.4 beat/min in group BD and BF respectively. After 15 minute heart rate was found 94.4 beat/min in group BD and 90.9 beat/min in group BF. After 30 minute heart rate was 88.7 beat/min in group BD and 85.2 beat/min in group BF. This study showed statistical comparison of postoperative mean RASS scale and CHEOPS at different time interval between three groups. The corresponding mean differences in various groups were comparable and statistically significant (p<0.05). In group BD score was better than BF and the difference of group BD vs. group BF was significant except at base line, 90 min, 120 min (p>0.05). Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine is better than fentanyl in infraumbilical surgery has longer sedation and longer postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine potentiates the action of local anaesthetics without increasing the incidence of side-effects compared to fentanyl.

布比卡因加右美托咪定与布比卡因加芬太尼用于小儿脐下手术尾侧阻滞的比较。
为了提高单剂量尾侧阻滞术中局部麻醉剂的镇痛时间和镇痛质量,研究人员采用了阿片类药物、肾上腺素、可乐定、新斯的明等添加剂。右美托咪定是一种强效的高选择性α - 2肾上腺素能激动剂,具有交感神经溶解、镇静和镇痛作用,在许多麻醉和镇痛技术中被认为是一种安全有效的添加剂。另一种药物是芬太尼,一种亲脂性阿片类药物,经常添加到局部麻醉剂中,由于其高脂溶性,在外给药时不太可能引起呼吸抑制。它改善和延长布比卡因添加后的镇痛下腹部或脐下手术。该研究旨在比较布比卡因联合右美托咪定与布比卡因联合芬太尼用于小儿脐下手术尾侧阻滞的疗效。该实验研究于2019年5月12日至2019年11月11日在孟加拉国迈门辛格医学院医院进行。将60例经美国麻醉学会(ASA)身体状态分类为I-II类、需行尾侧阻滞下脐下手术的患者按卡片法随机分为两组,每组30例。采用标准化的麻醉方案进行诱导、维持和恢复。BD组(n=30)给予右美托咪定1 μg/kg加布比卡因0.5 ml/kg 0.25%; BF组(n=30)给予芬太尼1 μg/kg加布比卡因0.5 ml/kg 0.25%,用于尾侧硬膜外镇痛。BD组和BF组患者平均年龄分别为6.1±1.7岁和6.3±1.2岁。各组间年龄差异无统计学意义(p=0.721)。男女比例为1.12:1。BD组有19例(63.3%)为ASA I, 11例(36.7%)为ASA II。BF组有22例(73.4%)为ASA I, 8例(26.6%)为ASA II。BD组和BF组的基线心率分别为95.2次/分和98.4次/分。15分钟后,BD组心率为94.4次/分,BF组为90.9次/分。30min后,BD组心率88.7次/min, BF组心率85.2次/min。本研究对三组患者术后不同时间间隔的平均RASS评分和CHEOPS进行统计学比较。各组间相应的平均差异具有可比性和统计学意义(p0.05)。右美托咪定作为布比卡因的辅助用药,在脐下手术中镇静时间和术后镇痛时间优于芬太尼。与芬太尼相比,右美托咪定增强了局部麻醉的作用,但没有增加副作用的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信