E Fabian, Ph Eberwein, M Müller, K Fabian, J Weisensee, A Langenbucher, J-H Heine
{"title":"[A new validated ophthalmic patient questionnaire for cataract and lens surgery : CLOQ: cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire].","authors":"E Fabian, Ph Eberwein, M Müller, K Fabian, J Weisensee, A Langenbucher, J-H Heine","doi":"10.1007/s00347-024-02155-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The new patient cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire (CLOQ) determines subjective patient satisfaction before and after cataract surgery according to item response theory (IRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 317 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of different intraocular lens (IOL) types were included. The questionnaire (37 questions) is divided into questions on visual acuity-relevant quality of life (VRQoL), quality of vision (QoV), spectacle dependence, and general satisfaction. For all questions, five response categories are available. Analysis is performed by determining the model parameters/item characteristic curves. Testing of the model is performed by expected score curves, infit/outfit statistics, and determination of reliability and Cronbach's α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IRT analyses for the QoL and QoV questions showed 1. a clear order of threshold parameters in the multilevel response scale; 2. a good fit of the response model of the empirical and the expected score curves; 3. unidimensionality, with values of < 1 for the mean square in- and outfit statistics; and 4. reliability of F<sub>WLE</sub> = 0.87 and 0.71, respectively. The post-surgical improvement is clearly evident in the higher person parameters, spectacle dependency, and better visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standard calculations were performed for model parameters, model tests, and reliability based on a partial credit model. The results confirm the suitability for evaluation of subjective patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":72808,"journal":{"name":"Die Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-024-02155-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The new patient cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire (CLOQ) determines subjective patient satisfaction before and after cataract surgery according to item response theory (IRT).
Methods: A total of 317 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of different intraocular lens (IOL) types were included. The questionnaire (37 questions) is divided into questions on visual acuity-relevant quality of life (VRQoL), quality of vision (QoV), spectacle dependence, and general satisfaction. For all questions, five response categories are available. Analysis is performed by determining the model parameters/item characteristic curves. Testing of the model is performed by expected score curves, infit/outfit statistics, and determination of reliability and Cronbach's α.
Results: The IRT analyses for the QoL and QoV questions showed 1. a clear order of threshold parameters in the multilevel response scale; 2. a good fit of the response model of the empirical and the expected score curves; 3. unidimensionality, with values of < 1 for the mean square in- and outfit statistics; and 4. reliability of FWLE = 0.87 and 0.71, respectively. The post-surgical improvement is clearly evident in the higher person parameters, spectacle dependency, and better visual acuity.
Conclusion: Standard calculations were performed for model parameters, model tests, and reliability based on a partial credit model. The results confirm the suitability for evaluation of subjective patient satisfaction.