Overview and Comparison of Interscalene Block Techniques for Brachial Plexus Pain Management.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alan D Kaye, William C Upshaw, Caroline Holley, Paris D Bailey, Joseph P Tassin, Mark V Frolov, Sanjana Sudini, Benjamin C Miller, Zachary R Palowsky, Saurabh Kataria, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Christopher L Robinson
{"title":"Overview and Comparison of Interscalene Block Techniques for Brachial Plexus Pain Management.","authors":"Alan D Kaye, William C Upshaw, Caroline Holley, Paris D Bailey, Joseph P Tassin, Mark V Frolov, Sanjana Sudini, Benjamin C Miller, Zachary R Palowsky, Saurabh Kataria, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Christopher L Robinson","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01346-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Peripheral nerve blocks are performed using local anesthetics that are commonly performed prior to surgery to either be the sole anesthetic and/or for postoperative pain management. Interscalene blocks are a specific type of nerve block that targets the superior and middle trunks of the brachial plexus inhibiting transmission of pain signals from the upper extremities to the central nervous system making them useful in mitigating pain following surgeries involving the shoulder, upper arm, and elbow.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Previously, interscalene blocks were performed with a nerve stimulator, which is an instrument designed to generate a twitch in surrounding muscles to verify the anesthetic block was placed in the correct location. However, this approach with a nerve stimulator alone is being done less frequently as physicians now often employ ultrasound either by itself or in conjunction with a nerve stimulator to in the block. Several clinical studies have shown that the use of ultrasound leads to improved safety and effectiveness of the interscalene block as compared to performing the block using a nerve stimulator alone. Clinical studies comparing interscalene blocks done with ultrasound versus ultrasound in conjunction with a nerve stimulator have shown the combination to be slightly safer and more efficacious with reduced side effects, though the difference in these metrics between the two is small. Interscalene blocks are highly effective for postoperative pain related to shoulder and upper extremity surgeries. Ultrasound guided blocks are more effective with reduced adverse effects when compared to nerve stimulation alone. The combination of both ultrasound and nerve stimulation allows for increased efficacy and decreaed side effects in limited clinical investigations. Therefore, more studies are needed to further compare and determine best practice interscalene techniques for shoulder and upper extremity surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01346-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Peripheral nerve blocks are performed using local anesthetics that are commonly performed prior to surgery to either be the sole anesthetic and/or for postoperative pain management. Interscalene blocks are a specific type of nerve block that targets the superior and middle trunks of the brachial plexus inhibiting transmission of pain signals from the upper extremities to the central nervous system making them useful in mitigating pain following surgeries involving the shoulder, upper arm, and elbow.

Recent findings: Previously, interscalene blocks were performed with a nerve stimulator, which is an instrument designed to generate a twitch in surrounding muscles to verify the anesthetic block was placed in the correct location. However, this approach with a nerve stimulator alone is being done less frequently as physicians now often employ ultrasound either by itself or in conjunction with a nerve stimulator to in the block. Several clinical studies have shown that the use of ultrasound leads to improved safety and effectiveness of the interscalene block as compared to performing the block using a nerve stimulator alone. Clinical studies comparing interscalene blocks done with ultrasound versus ultrasound in conjunction with a nerve stimulator have shown the combination to be slightly safer and more efficacious with reduced side effects, though the difference in these metrics between the two is small. Interscalene blocks are highly effective for postoperative pain related to shoulder and upper extremity surgeries. Ultrasound guided blocks are more effective with reduced adverse effects when compared to nerve stimulation alone. The combination of both ultrasound and nerve stimulation allows for increased efficacy and decreaed side effects in limited clinical investigations. Therefore, more studies are needed to further compare and determine best practice interscalene techniques for shoulder and upper extremity surgeries.

斜角肌间阻滞技术治疗臂丛疼痛的综述与比较。
综述目的:周围神经阻滞是使用局麻药进行的,局麻药通常在手术前作为唯一麻醉剂和/或用于术后疼痛管理。斜角肌间阻滞是一种特殊类型的神经阻滞,以臂丛上干和中干为靶点,抑制上肢疼痛信号向中枢神经系统的传递,有助于减轻肩部、上臂和肘部手术后的疼痛。最近的发现:以前,斜角肌间阻滞是用神经刺激器进行的,这是一种设计用于在周围肌肉中产生抽搐以验证麻醉阻滞放置在正确位置的仪器。然而,这种单独使用神经刺激器的方法越来越少,因为医生现在经常使用超声波,或者单独使用,或者与神经刺激器联合使用。一些临床研究表明,与单独使用神经刺激器进行阻滞相比,使用超声可提高斜角肌间阻滞的安全性和有效性。临床研究比较了超声与超声联合神经刺激器进行的斜角肌间阻滞,结果表明,两者的组合更安全,更有效,副作用更少,尽管两者在这些指标上的差异很小。斜角肌间阻滞对肩关节和上肢手术后疼痛非常有效。与单独的神经刺激相比,超声引导阻滞更有效,不良反应更少。在有限的临床研究中,超声和神经刺激的结合可以提高疗效并减少副作用。因此,需要更多的研究来进一步比较和确定肩关节和上肢手术的最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信